Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.
“The archive is consuming its host, brandishing all the malicious resentment of the profaned, the philistine, the exile.” Though prophetic, this statement — penned by Gregory Sholette in his recent book Dark Matter — refers not to future projects but the subversive potential of those radical archives long since entombed within neoliberal cultural institutions. Snowed in as such archives may be, notably the thirty-year-old Political Art Documentation/Distribution (PAD/D) archive now at the Museum of Modern Art’s Queens warehouse, the practice of what Lucy R. Lippard called “archival activism” in 1979 is today more hybrid than it has ever been, its need ever more exigent.
This charge is taken up in earnest by Radical Archives, a two-day conference organized by the artists Chitra Ganesh and Mariam Ghani running yesterday and today at New York University (NYU). Collaborators since 2004 on the project “Index of the Disappeared,” Ganesh and Ghani organized Radical Archives as part of their 2013–14 residency at the Asian/Pacific/American Institute at NYU, where they have also staged a trio of exhibitions. (Two have closed; the third consists of two parts — Parasitic Archive, on view at the NYU Kevorkian Center for Near Eastern Studies through May 12, and Watch this Space, running April 16 to May 12 in NYU’s Kimmel Windows Gallery.)
The Radical Archives conference unites a broad spectrum of scholars and practitioners on diverse facets of archival practice: “It’s a conference about archives as a radical practice in four different ways: as radical politics, as radical or experimental in form, in movements or contexts where archiving is the last site of resistance, and as activating absence,” Ghani told Hyperallergic.
The programming was inaugurated yesterday morning with a didactic keynote speech on Egypt by the artist Lara Baladi entitled “Archiving a Revolution.” How does one archive a revolution, in which, as Baladi put it, “lots of media was constantly being uploaded”? Though her 45-minute talk packed an impressive density of information on the many projects and initiatives that emerged in the many aftermaths of Tahrir Square’s January 2011 eruption, Baladi would have benefited from further context on the structural antagonisms facing the archival practices she highlighted, like the presence of a monolithic state media apparatus embedded within what has been termed Egypt’s military deep state.
Her account was also limited to successful archival projects, privileging high-visibility online initiatives and well-publicized guerilla ventures like Cinema Tahrir. This resulted in the unfortunate omission of one of the post-revolutionary period’s most important archival projects: the defunct u-shahid.org initiative, which allowed Egyptians to anonymously document electoral abuses during the 2012 People’s Assembly (parliamentary) elections, overlaying the reports on a map. The failure of such a rigorous and politically potent project surely entails important considerations for the active and passive dimensions of archival practice.
By the same token, Baladi overlooked areas of archival success in Egypt, like the complete digitization of Napoleon’s Description de l’Égypte by the Bibliotheca Alexandrina in 2005 (and the institution’s much larger manuscript digitization program), in favor of alarmist news narratives about the wholesale loss of Egyptian cultural heritage, including a burned handwritten copy of the Description at the Institut d’Égypte and the looting of a minor museum in Malawi (since restored).
This tension between the archive as a means of making knowledge and information more resilient, of deploying the radical potential of the past, and its possible reinscription of a retrograde object-fetish emerged on the subject of zine digitization at a subsequent panel. “Disrupting Standards, Remarking Interfaces” united a university archivist, library and independent archivists, an academic, and a zine archive technologist under the able moderation of Alexander Provan, founding editor of Triple Canopy — likely an indication that the programming of Radical Archives is of interest to many audiences.
Radical Archives continues today at NYU’s Cantor Film Center (36 E. 8th Street, Greenwich Village, Manhattan) through 8pm.
New works by one of Bangladesh’s most prominent photojournalists, writers, and activists are on view at the Chicago art space through November 27.
Council often uses humor as a political tool to expose systems of power and inequality in a society in which even death carries a high price tag.
An exhibition at the San Francisco Opera House pairs the work of incarcerated artists with Beethoven’s story of unjust imprisonment.
Many works take disruption and repetition as their themes, and many artists resurface in different sections, creating multiple affinities.
Hear from Holly Jean Buck, Carolina Caycedo and David de Rozas, Simon Denny, Elizabeth Hoover, Renee Kemp-Rotan, Joseph Kunkel, and more at this free public event.
In Cooking with Paris, Hilton capitalizes on her portrayal of being a competent woman, while highlighting its anachronism through her absurd performance. Rosler manipulates the camera in the same way.
EFA Open Studios offers a portal into the creative habitats of over 65 artists working in Manhattan’s longest-running studio program, including Dannielle Tegeder, Wafaa Bilal, Cui Fei, and Anina Major.
A man says Blue Bayou took details of his life without his permission. Several women who appear in the documentary Sabaya say they did not consent to be filmed. How can filmmakers avoid these ethical pitfalls?
Ursula Biemann, Nicolas Bourriaud, and others said they will no longer participate in the event.
There is an official ban against the public mourning of Tiananmen Square victims in Hong Kong and mainland China.