“The archive is consuming its host, brandishing all the malicious resentment of the profaned, the philistine, the exile.” Though prophetic, this statement — penned by Gregory Sholette in his recent book Dark Matter — refers not to future projects but the subversive potential of those radical archives long since entombed within neoliberal cultural institutions. Snowed in as such archives may be, notably the thirty-year-old Political Art Documentation/Distribution (PAD/D) archive now at the Museum of Modern Art’s Queens warehouse, the practice of what Lucy R. Lippard called “archival activism” in 1979 is today more hybrid than it has ever been, its need ever more exigent.
This charge is taken up in earnest by Radical Archives, a two-day conference organized by the artists Chitra Ganesh and Mariam Ghani running yesterday and today at New York University (NYU). Collaborators since 2004 on the project “Index of the Disappeared,” Ganesh and Ghani organized Radical Archives as part of their 2013–14 residency at the Asian/Pacific/American Institute at NYU, where they have also staged a trio of exhibitions. (Two have closed; the third consists of two parts — Parasitic Archive, on view at the NYU Kevorkian Center for Near Eastern Studies through May 12, and Watch this Space, running April 16 to May 12 in NYU’s Kimmel Windows Gallery.)
The Radical Archives conference unites a broad spectrum of scholars and practitioners on diverse facets of archival practice: “It’s a conference about archives as a radical practice in four different ways: as radical politics, as radical or experimental in form, in movements or contexts where archiving is the last site of resistance, and as activating absence,” Ghani told Hyperallergic.
The programming was inaugurated yesterday morning with a didactic keynote speech on Egypt by the artist Lara Baladi entitled “Archiving a Revolution.” How does one archive a revolution, in which, as Baladi put it, “lots of media was constantly being uploaded”? Though her 45-minute talk packed an impressive density of information on the many projects and initiatives that emerged in the many aftermaths of Tahrir Square’s January 2011 eruption, Baladi would have benefited from further context on the structural antagonisms facing the archival practices she highlighted, like the presence of a monolithic state media apparatus embedded within what has been termed Egypt’s military deep state.
Her account was also limited to successful archival projects, privileging high-visibility online initiatives and well-publicized guerilla ventures like Cinema Tahrir. This resulted in the unfortunate omission of one of the post-revolutionary period’s most important archival projects: the defunct u-shahid.org initiative, which allowed Egyptians to anonymously document electoral abuses during the 2012 People’s Assembly (parliamentary) elections, overlaying the reports on a map. The failure of such a rigorous and politically potent project surely entails important considerations for the active and passive dimensions of archival practice.
By the same token, Baladi overlooked areas of archival success in Egypt, like the complete digitization of Napoleon’s Description de l’Égypte by the Bibliotheca Alexandrina in 2005 (and the institution’s much larger manuscript digitization program), in favor of alarmist news narratives about the wholesale loss of Egyptian cultural heritage, including a burned handwritten copy of the Description at the Institut d’Égypte and the looting of a minor museum in Malawi (since restored).
This tension between the archive as a means of making knowledge and information more resilient, of deploying the radical potential of the past, and its possible reinscription of a retrograde object-fetish emerged on the subject of zine digitization at a subsequent panel. “Disrupting Standards, Remarking Interfaces” united a university archivist, library and independent archivists, an academic, and a zine archive technologist under the able moderation of Alexander Provan, founding editor of Triple Canopy — likely an indication that the programming of Radical Archives is of interest to many audiences.
Radical Archives continues today at NYU’s Cantor Film Center (36 E. 8th Street, Greenwich Village, Manhattan) through 8pm.
To understand contemporary art, it is necessary to investigate the connections that are sometimes omitted or undervalued in art history.
Gearhart founded a print gallery with her sisters and was at the center of the Arts and Crafts movement in southern California.
Featuring underwater recordings from around the world, this immersive, site-specific installation is on view at the Lenfest Center for the Arts in NYC from February 3 to 13.
Video art was something you watched “with the lights on,” as França insisted, without pretenses of high art.
PHASE 2 would emerge as an innovator in New York’s burgeoning subway art movement, creating elaborate murals that would shape the evolution of both the spray can and the art form.
BRIC’s multidisciplinary program in Brooklyn has cohorts in Contemporary Art, Film & TV, Performing Arts, and Video Art. Applications are due March 10.
While the South Asian diaspora is one of the largest and most widely dispersed in the world, the Indo-Caribbean community is often overlooked and excluded from discussions of South Asian art.
The Bay Area artist believed in shaping artists rather than relaying rules.
Open-ended, community based, and collaborative, “esolangs” serve as a reminder that digital art has other histories and other futures.
Working with what they had, Cass Corridor artists scrapped and repurposed anything they could get their hands on, attempting to find some salvation for their city through a literal process of salvage and reuse.
Throughout the 1970s and into the ’80s, artists in Los Angeles created organizations and exhibition spaces to develop the resources they lacked.