When I read about Marina Abramović’s volunteer advertisement on the New York Foundation for the Arts (NYFA) website last week, it got me thinking about how many arts nonprofits employ the law to their benefit, and many times against an ethical grain.
According to the New York State Department of Labor fact sheet on wage requirements for interns in not-for-profit businesses, “There is no section of the Labor Law that exempts ‘interns’ at not-for-profit organizations from the minimum wage requirements.” Although there is no “interns” category per se, Labor Law does carve out three categories of workers that may be excepted from minimum wage requirements. The three categories are volunteers, students, and trainees/learners, and apply only to not-for-profit organizations or institutions set up and operated exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes.
Presumably the Marina Abramovic Institute (MAI) was established for an educational purpose. Assuming that, it seems that the main question would be whether these “volunteers” sought by MAI are replacing or augmenting paid staff and whether they are being required to work certain hours, among other factors. These same “volunteers” could be classified as trainees/learners, but given that the NYFA job ads detail a need for applicants who come to the MAI with a certain set of skills, there doesn’t seem to be any indication that these “volunteers” would be given supervised formal instruction or on-the-job training. And unless they’re students — or recent students — enrolled in a degree, diploma, or certificate granting institution, the above would still apply.
One other related thought is why NYFA publishes such job advertisements. Even if there are no legal repercussions, one would hope NYFA’s internal policies would be a bit more stringent so as to not perpetuate and condone any exploitative labor practices.
Although it may seem that MAI (and many other arts nonprofits) may be legally within their bounds, the question is whether the current legal framework should be exploited by those who purport to represent and support artists and other cultural producers. I recall back in 2005, as a fellow for the Center for Constitutional Rights, hearing from a colleague how then-Judge (now U.S. Supreme Court Justice) Sotomayor, during oral arguments that summer, once asked one of the attorneys: “Just because you can, does that mean you should?”
The author is an artist and arts lawyer in New York.
Some museums are opting for new language to describe the preserved individuals in their collections who were once living humans.
Presented by Northwestern’s Block Museum and McCormick School of Engineering, this new exhibition seeks empathy at the boundaries of life. On view in Evanston, Illinois.
Located in Des Moines, Iowa, this residency for emerging and established artists includes studio and living space, a $1,000 monthly stipend, and more.
As art history buffs on the app have pointed out, both movements attribute meaning to the meaningless.
Multiple posts about the film have been taken down on Twitter, many of them following the government’s removal requests.
This week, blonde hair supremacy, Salman Rushdie’s new novel, and why do boutique shops all look the same?
Fayneese Miller is under fire after the school failed to renew the contract of an adjunct who showed artworks depicting the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.
Fully-funded teaching assistantships are standard for MFA students at the top-ranked, flagship research university in the state of New York.
Hundreds of visitors were evacuated from the Incan site over the weekend.
The artist’s works resonate in West Texas, where the story of dehumanized and exploited migrant laborers is tangible and ever-present.
A posthumous show of Price’s work is curated by James Hart of Phil Space, the self-proclaimed “gallerist of death.”
She has raised generations of Bay Area artists and changed the local landscape with her public artworks, colleagues tell Hyperallergic.