You walk into the New-York Historical Society’s Chinese American: Inclusion/Exclusion and see the sort of exhibition you expect from a stately uptown museum: a gilded frame featuring an upright white man with mutton chops, a miniature ship, fine porcelains. But when you turn the corner, something different greets you: a chain-link cage, simulations of a eugenicist medical examination, harsh customs interrogations. The exhibition asks you to reconsider the grandiosity of those first sections, and how the revered objects of the past take on richer and darker meanings when measured by the lived experiences of the many.
Chinese American consciously simulates the American immigrant’s journey: hope, dehumanization, mixed blessings; individual narratives that together paint the greater arc of America. The exhibition is part of the NYHS’s effort to be more inclusive, relevant, interactive since its reopening a few years ago. Perhaps the best symbol for this shift is the assemblage by artist Fred Wilson in the renovated lobby, where busts of the founding fathers are juxtaposed with slave shackles: American history is layered, built out of oppression as much as triumph.
Chinese American was organized by NYHS’s Marci Reaven with John Kuo Wei Tchen acting as senior historian (disclosure: he co-founded Museum of Chinese in America, where I used to work). The show is an experiment in both the telling of history through exhibitions and the historiography of the Chinese-American experience. The many interactive pieces like drawers to pull out, sliding dioramas, and touch screens offer many points for visitor engagement. This approachability acts as an entry point into the show’s high stakes: to completely reshape the popular understanding of China-America relations, and the way Chinese in America have been both the wedge caught between the nations and the protagonists in that story.
From the beginning of this country, the titans of American industry derived their wealth and finery and taste from this other country that seemed, and still is cast, as so other. “Chinese tea and goods went into America’s formation identity as a new nation. It was important economically — we needed that trade,” says Cynthia Ai-fen Lee, one of the curators for the exhibition. Dioramas highlight stories of luminaries like newspaper editor Wong Chin Foo, who fought stereotypical representations of Chinese in America with his bombastic writing and speeches.
The era beginning with the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 marks a dark turning point for the Chinese American experience, the groundwork for more than a century of racial violence. It is also the most disturbing part of the exhibition, showing the detention and racial othering of Chinese immigrants. We see photographs of young boys in line to be examined at Angel Island detention center near San Francisco, a eugenicist sign reminding us that lesser humans are being born every few seconds. “Racial science was used to patrol our borders,” says Lee. She points out that the very term “illegal immigrant” came into usage during the exclusion era.
Artist Larry Hama was commissioned to profile the Chin family in comic panels. Members of the family touch on almost every chapter of Chinese inclusion and exclusion, from ‘illegal’ immigration as ‘paper sons’ to serving in WWII to operating a hand laundry in the Bronx. The comic style abstracts their stories, and allows us to read our own family stories into theirs.
The exhibition ends on as large and sweeping a scope as the introduction. It touches on civil rights and arts movements in the last forty years, a video offers more outstanding individual stories from Chinese America; on display is a newly-restored hundred-year-old ceremonial dragon, “Moo Lung,” which acts a metaphor for the Chinese American resilience. If the ending feels unresolved, perhaps that is necessary. As Lee said: “What is post-exclusion? It takes generations for us to understand what that might look like.”
Chinese American: Inclusion/Exclusion continues at New-York Historical Society (170 Central Park West, Upper West Side, Manhattan) through April 19, 2015.
What would it look like if museums turned their billions toward positive good instead of questionable investments simply for profit?
Patricio Guzmán combines reflection on the past, observation of the present, and hope for the future into an expansive vision of all the ideas he’s explored in his work.
Artists reflect on histories of oppressive power structures in Brazil in this exhibition at the Visual Arts Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
So closely do Disney’s animators assimilate the sensibility of French design that on occasion their source material appears almost more Disney than Disney itself.
The Grand Avenue Billboard Project enables artists like Karen Fiorito to publicly express their political views.
The museum opens to the public on October 8 with a 24-hour kickoff and a rebooted California Biennial.
The report estimates that 6.7 million Indigenous objects and human remains continue to be held in Canadian institutions, most of which do not have formal repatriation policies.
Funding options at UB include full-tuition scholarships for MFA students, the Arthur A. Schomburg Fellowship Program, and additional opportunities for MA students.
The Association of Art Museum Directors announced a shift in its longstanding policy, which restricted the use of funds from sales of art to new acquisitions only.
Martín Mobarak may have broken Mexican law, but he burned the proof.
Your list of must-see, fun, insightful, and very Los Angeles art events this month, including the Maya Codex of Mexico at the Getty, Beatrice Wood, Trenton Doyle Hancock, and more.