This week, two men made headlines when they doused the tomb of the Soviet Union’s first leader Vladimir Lenin with holy water while reportedly shouting “Rise up and leave!” The guerrilla action in Moscow’s Red Square was titled “Exorcising the Devil, Desecrating the Mausoleum” and landed the duo, dance teacher Oleg Basov and computer programmer Yevgeny Avilov — members of an anti-establishment art group called Blue Rider — in jail for 10 days.
According to the Guardian, “the aim of the performance was ‘to confront two myths,’ the communist idea that Lenin ‘lives’ and the Christian idea of resurrection.”
The legacy of Lenin continues to be hotly contested in Russia. A 2013 poll found that 25% of Russians thought Lenin’s body should remain in the mausoleum, while 53% thought he should be buried.
Recently, New York–based artist Yevgeniy Fiks, whose work often involves excavating the history of 20th-century Communism, mounted an exhibition at the CUNY Graduate Center titled The Lenin Museum. Focused on the intersection of sexuality (particularly homosexuality) and communism, the show included paintings of renowned gay male cruising spots in Moscow, including the Lenin Museum, a documentary video about gay life during the Soviet period, and reports from the post-Soviet Russian media, which often tries to smear Lenin by portraying him as being pro-gay.
Fiks’s show probed an uncomfortable alliance in Russian history between Soviet forces and progressive sexual activists. That short-lived period of freedom eventually gave way to anti-gay repression under Joseph Stalin. The exhibition offered a compelling look at social mores and their manipulation by political forces. At the center of the show was an installation of two bathroom cubicles covered with an image of the Lenin Museum and words scrawled inside from an old biography of Lenin that psychoanalyzed his writings and speeches for traces of latent homosexuality. The piece underlined the personal narratives that are lost in history books, and also pointed to the impact of our present ideologies on our views of the recent past.
Fascinated by Fiks and his insight, I asked the artist to share his thoughts about Lenin’s Mausoleum, the Blue Rider performance, and what it represented in Russia today:
That the body of Lenin still laying in the Mausoleum on display 20 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union is truly remarkable. For many Russian liberals (read neoliberals) it’s a sign of impossibility or unwillingness on the part of society to leave the Soviet era behind. To have a clear break with the Soviet malaise. Many in Russia see Lenin in the Mausoleum in 2015 as a failure. Neoliberals regret the fact that Russia didn’t undergo a process of lustration and allowed former communists to serve in the government till this day. Often, one would hear “till Lenin’s body is kicked out of the mausoleum and is buried in the ground nothing in Russia would change…” But what would really change if Lenin’s body would be put in the ground? I doubt that this would, for instance, change the problem with corruption, social inequality, or curb xenophobia. Let’s for a moment assume that Lenin’s body is no longer in the mausoleum. Whom will the society blame then? In Russian, there is a great saying: “don’t blame the mirror if the face is crooked.”
The most recent action with pouring holy water at the Lenin Masoleum is one in a long line of desacralizations performed by activists in the Russian capital. Artists and activists who perpetrated these actions play the role of the proverbial Russian yurodivy — a type of jester, who is supposed to be allowed (at least ideally) to speak truth to power without fear of persecution. The paradox of this particular action, however, is that what the activists seemingly do — “getting rid of Lenin” or “resurrecting Lenin” — is what both the Church and the Communists would approve of. But the state, of course, only sees it as petty hooliganism.
Whether Lenin’s body will actually be taken out of the mausoleum someday and buried or “rise up and leave” remains to be seen…
Musician and activist Charles Murrell said he was assaulted by members of Patriot Front on his way to work.
“Nana Harriet risked life and limb to be free so that no one White person would benefit off her person. And now we have someone white benefiting off of her,” said artist Maisha Sullivan-Ongoza.
This destination for modern and contemporary art showcases the vibrant arts community of the Pacific Northwest alongside galleries from around the world, open July 21 through 24.
As the global consensus on restitution passes the tipping point, some skepticism towards these sudden, improbable Damascene conversions towards restitution is probably justified.
The Renaissance master was boundlessly ambitious and intimidatingly energetic, charming, good-looking, diplomatic, and utterly opportunistic.
Part of a media project by Dr. Imani M. Cheers, Framing Fatherhood is on view at the George Washington University’s Corcoran School of the Arts and Design in DC through July 31.
Zadie Xa’s quilted textiles and Hernan Bas’s paintings of adolescent men enjoy a surprising but generative dialogue at San Francisco’s Jessica Silverman gallery.
While Koons may be a man on the moon, he’s looking back at Earth, oblivious to the vastness behind him, if only he would turn around.
International audiences have free access to the media collections of MMCA Korea, Sharjah Art Foundation, and ArkDes through this subscription-based art streaming platform.
Croatian filmmaker Antoneta Alamat Kusijanović’s debut feature accurately captures a certain kind of Balkan machismo.
The Getty Foundation announced late last week a new pilot program for emerging arts professionals from historically underrepresented groups, funding two-year positions at 10 Los Angeles arts institutions. The Getty Marrow Emerging Professionals pilot program — named after Deborah Marrow, the former Getty Foundation director who spearheaded an undergraduate internship initiative at the organization —…
Contemporary artist studios in Karachi prioritize pragmatism; many resist a traditional understanding of spaces with singular purposes.