Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.
Perhaps it doesn’t take Kim Kardashian’s bare bottom to #BreaktheInternet. An image of a perfectly innocent lace sheath dress has made its way around the internet — no bare bottoms or exposed skin in sight — as its colors have become the subject of heated debate. The online world is firmly divided between those who swear that the dress is white and gold and those who insist that it’s black and blue.
The dress in question, originally worn by the mother of the bride at a wedding on the Scottish island of Colonsay, made its way onto the internet thanks to Caitlin McNeill, a singer and guest at the wedding. As McNeill told Business Insider, the absurdly pitched debate over the dress’s colors began as mundane bickering between a friend and her fiancé: “What happened was two of my close friends were actually getting married and the mother of the bride took a photo of the dress to send to her daughter. When my friend showed the dress to her fiancé, they disagreed on the color.”
After her Facebook friends were unable to reach a consensus about the colors of the dress, McNeill posted a photo on Tumblr on February 25. “Guys please help me,” she asked. “Is this dress white and gold, or blue and black? Me and my friends can’t agree and we are freaking the f*** out.” McNeill’s post received 500 likes and shares within the first half-hour; by the end of the first hour, the number grew to thousands. A BuzzFeed article then catapulted the dress to viral fame. As of this writing, that BuzzFeed post has received over 27 million views.
Journalists were quick to call in experts, citing the debate’s roots in the idiosyncrasies of our biological makeup. “This fight is about more than just social media — it’s about primal biology and the way human eyes and brains have evolved to see color in a sunlit world,” observed Adam Rogers of Wired. Even color scholars like Dr. Jay Neitz were befuddled. When he initially looked at the photograph, Neitz — who studies individual differences in optical perception — saw white and gold, he told Vice. After consulting his lab at the University of Washington and further examining the image, however, he proposed several conjectures as to why the dress’s colors in the photograph had become such a divisive issue. Differences in color perception could be attributable to age, and those who are older are less sensitive to blue light. Colored lighting also affects our perception of an object’s color; if a blue dress is placed under blue light, our tendency toward “color constancy” will tell us it’s white because we instinctively correct for the lighting source’s color.
The dress is also an illustration of a special optical effect, the Bezold effect, in which the placement of certain colors next to one another affects viewers’ perception of all the colors on the plane or in the image. It’s also possible that the photograph is extremely overexposed and/or poorly color corrected, causing all the hues in it to appear much lighter than they actually are. (Check out the Wired piece for images that demonstrate this.)
The unique and confusing nature of the dress incident has — like so many things on the internet — inspired impassioned opinions from a wide range of individuals and groups, from celebrities like Taylor Swift and Rashida Jones to police departments.
Given the color issue at the heart of the debate, art institutions have also jumped on the bandwagon — among them the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Public Art Fund, and Detroit Institute of Arts — in an effort to drum up publicity and direct people to their collections.
And those tweeting about #TheDress have, naturally, riffed on other popular hashtags, appropriating socially conscious ones like #BlackLivesMatter and #YesAllWomen to turn the whole thing into a potentially misplaced joke (#DressLivesMatter and #YesAllDresses).
So, amid all this hysteria, what did McNeill have to say when she finally saw the dress in person? “I got to the wedding and the mother was wearing the dress,” she told Business Insider. “Obviously it was blue and black.”
The purported dress for sale on Amazon.
The works in Fault Lines prove that abstraction need not be confined to the inner life of the artist.
Celeste’s sculptures all rely on natural forces to achieve balance, and thus are perpetually on the precipice of collapse.
Romanticism to Ruin: Two Lost Works of Sullivan and Wright memorializes Chicago’s Garrick Theatre and Buffalo’s Larkin Building, which were razed to build a parking lot and a truck stop.
By reinventing the traditional bokashi technique, Hamanaka reminds us that nothing is dead, even when many proclaim otherwise.
The company’s mastery of the art market’s smoke and mirrors is its most impressive illusion.
Sadly, though by no means surprisingly, there is precedence for this female erasure. Women have been and continue to be the executors of the invisible, unpaid, unaccredited labor that makes much of the world run smoothly.