Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism. Become a Member »

Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.

Boston has been ranked as the most creatively inspiring city for young artists (Image via Instagram/bretclancy)

In our data-obsessed era, we tend to think that any question can be solved by just looking at statistics, indexes, or rankings — even when it comes to something as elusive as the best place to find artistic inspiration.

The educational website WorldWideLearn recently culled data from the American Community Survey and the Local Arts Index to rank the 15 most creatively inspiring cities in the United States for aspiring young artists and art students. The results are mostly predictable — New York, Boston, Washington D.C., Los Angeles, and San Francisco make up the top five — though there are a few curveballs. Few people think of Lexington, Kentucky (which came in sixth) or Anchorage, Alaska (seventh) when considering locales particularly conducive to art studies.

The report’s authors ascribed scores to cities populated by 300,000 or more people according to seven basic metrics that presumably make for an inspiring environment: percentage of the population in college or graduate school; percentage of the population aged 18–34; art dealers per 100,000 people; performing arts companies in the metropolitan area per 100,000 people; museums per 100,000 people, fine arts schools in the metropolitan area per 100,000; and businesses classified in the “creative industry” sector per 100,000 people.

Boston ranked first for its large concentration of students and museums, as well as its quantity of arts-related jobs; the city has 104 museums and 6.9 fine art schools per 100,000 people. Coming in second, San Francisco enjoys a flourishing artistic industry with 3,567 such businesses and 4.62 performing arts companies per 100,000 people. New York — despite its reputation for having more art dealers, fine arts schools, creative businesses, museums, and dance and theater companies than any other city — only came in third, since its dense population weakened per-capita numbers. And with 3,599 creative businesses per 100,000 residents, Washington, DC beat out Los Angeles for fourth place.

The next 10 cities are much more surprising. Lexington ranked sixth because of its young student population (13.9% of resident are in school, and 23.7% are aged 18-34). Anchorage took seventh place, since it has the highest ratio of museums per capita — 2.55 per 100,000 people — and its median age of 33.2 years was the second lowest among cities surveyed. Colorado Springs, a bastion of social conservatism, came in ninth place, having 5.83 fine art schools per 100,000 people, while the Hawaiian capital of Honolulu took fifteenth due to its 3.69 performing arts companies per 100,000 people.

While it’s always exciting to hear about cities thriving creatively outside the usual art hubs, it’s hard to know how much WorldWideLearning’s report can be believed, as it doesn’t actually tell us anything about the quality of galleries, museums, and schools in these locales.

Also, its criteria echoes the art word’s existing, limiting biases. It assumes that artistic inspiration is best found in large urban areas, yet anyone who’s traveled to a small, culturally vibrant city like Portland, Maine knows that’s not true. Many artists have spent their careers in remote regions — Georgia O’Keefe and Susan Rothenberg both found or still find endless inspiration in New Mexico — yet no cities in the Southwest make the list, and only one in the Midwest does.

What’s more, the ranking doesn’t factor in costs of living. All the top five cities (as well as Honolulu) are among the country’s most expensive places to live. Many young artists without wealthy parents to bankroll their rent just can’t afford art school in such places.

As is, the report might be better titled “Fifteen Cities Where Students Can Best Make Art World Connections and Get a Job After Graduation.” Finding creative inspiration is a whole other ballgame, one that varies from person to person and can’t be figured out by simply looking at an index.

The Latest

Carles Guerra: An Endorsement of an Amicus Brief for Lanier v. Harvard

We cannot be indifferent to the long-lasting effects of photography. The photographs at the center of Lanier v. Harvard are relentless in making Renty and Delia Taylor work and perform as slaves. The pain inflicted on them has not ceased. Photography has the capacity to propagate harm, and we have the moral obligation to interrupt…

Laura C. Mallonee

Laura C. Mallonee is a Brooklyn-based writer. She holds an M.A. in Cultural Reporting and Criticism from NYU and a B.F.A. in painting from Missouri State University. She enjoys exploring new cities and...

11 replies on “The Most Inspiring Cities for Young Artists Ranked”

  1. “What’s more, the ranking doesn’t factor in costs of living. All the top five cities (as well as Honolulu) are among the country’s most expensive places to live.”

    Exactly. Isn’t there a current concern that NYC, for example, is chasing away new artists because it is just too damn expensive to live there?

    1. I can vouch for that. I do well as an artist. I’m born and raised in New York. I make six figures and even I can’t afford to live here anymore. This summer I’m joinng the mass exodus out of the city 🙁

      1. First world problems. NYC is expensive but I don’t see how you can make 6 figures as you claim and be priced out unless you have 80 kids with no help.

        1. Probably means priced out of the type of housing they think someone making six figures would be able to afford elsewhere.

  2. It seems to me that looking at recent historical periods where big cities produced great artist colonies, the common denominators are that 1) housing was cheap, 2) there were brilliant critics and writers involved, and 3) supportive patrons valued their work and facilitated a social network.

    For example, Abstract Expressionism in New York, Clement Goldberg, and Peggy Guggenheim. Post-WWI Paris, Hemingway & Fitzgerald, Gertrude Stein.

    Art doesn’t pay, and it’s a fundamentally social activity. This list is worse than worthless. The top 5 cities would require commuting in for the average artist.

  3. “Few people think of Lexington, Kentucky (which came in sixth)…. when considering locales particularly conducive to art studies.” This is only because mainstream national media coverage about Lexington sticks to horses, basketball and the first rural hillbilly trailer park reporters can find when filing reports from KY. In addition to its art studies and art community, Lexington’s also one of the most educated cities per capita in the USA. Didja know that?

    1. Yes, I knew that, because I reported it several times when I was a reporter for the mainstream Lexington Herald-Leader.

  4. The fact that Boston came out #1 is a perfect example of the problem with using data metrics to answer qualitative questions.

Comments are closed.