Long before the time of Disney and Pixar, artists made images move using a variety of -scopes and -tropes: gadgets like zoetropes (which means “wheel of life”), phenakistoscopes (“deceptive viewer”), thaumatropes (“turning wonder viewer”), and praxinoscopes (“action viewer”), to name a few. These so-called “optical toys” created the illusion of continuous movement by combining drawings, slits, and mirrors. Victorian audiences were transfixed.
Now, thanks to the efforts of Boston-based artist and collector Richard Balzer and LA-based animator Brian Duffy, the internet age, too, can fall under the hypnotic spell of this early technology. Forty years ago, after seeing his first “magic lantern,” an early image projector invented in the 1600s, Balzer developed an obsession with optical toys. He’s since amassed a collection of thousands of these early animation tools in his Boston home. With Duffy, he’s spent the last several years giving many of them a 21st-century update, digitizing them into spinning GIFs.
In these strange, spiraling mandalas, at-the-ready fencers, leaping zebras, and carefree jump-ropers orbit infinitely around blossoming or patterned centers. Balzer displays images of the original objects in his rabbit hole of a virtual museum, dickbalzer.com — — which he likens to an online version of a Wunderkammer, or cabinet of curiosities — and uploads the GIFs to Tumblr, revealing the simultaneous simplicity and wonders of animation technology some 150 years ago.
A new study details the creation of a hyper-flexible material inspired by an unexpected source: the humble sea cucumber.
The extensive exhibition confronts the Netherlands’s often-forgotten colonialist legacy.
The 1,600-year-old fragment was part of a dodecahedron, a mysterious object that experts believe may have been linked to the occult.
The Renaissance work by Francesco Salviati is the museum’s first painting on marble.
The 1969 exhibition 5 + 1, and now Revisiting 5 + 1, are reminders that the history of Black Art in the United States is diverse rather than monolithic.
The artist’s solo US museum debut at the Baltimore Museum of Art is a contemptuous, at times satirical, take on oppression that gives way to a new history.
Ten artists will receive studio space and access to faculty, staff, students, workshops, and programming at an arts institution in the heart of Philadelphia.
Who tells a tale adds a tail: Latin America and contemporary art explores contemporary Latin American art without conforming to external expectations.
Simulation Sketchbook takes as its starting point the reality that digital artists, like all artists, sketch out their work as well.
Twitter’s curbing of free API access could affect accounts posting from museum collections or the archives of long-gone artists.
How does a selective competition fit with the contemporary art world’s aspirations toward greater inclusivity?