Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism. Become a Member »

Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.

Installation view of ‘Repeat/Recreate’ at the Clyfford Still Museum with “PH-268″ (1955, left, Clyfford Still Museum © City and County of Denver” and “PH-921” (1955, right, Clyfford Still Museum © City and County of Denver) (all photos courtesy the Clyfford Still Museum unless indicated otherwise) (click to enlarge)

DENVER — The current exhibition at the Clyfford Still Museum (CSM), Repeat/Recreate, has been on the institution’s wish list for nearly 10 years, since well before it even opened. The museum controls 94% of Clyfford Still’s life’s work, yet the show required 12 lenders to gather pairs and triplicates for their first public display together. The result is a curatorial and institutional triumph.

Installation view of ‘Repeat/Recreate’ at the Clyfford Still Museum with “PH-1074” (1956–9, left, Clyfford Still Museum © City and County of Denver) and “PH-225” (1956, right, collection of the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth, Museum purchase, The Benjamin J. Tillar Memorial Trust © City and County of Denver) (click to enlarge)

The exhibition starts in a small gallery of five self-portraits produced between 1923 and 1940. Still painted “PH-672” (1923) when he was just 18 years old. In dramatic lighting, he renders himself as a serious young man wearing round spectacles, a page boy hat, and with the collar of his wool coat propped high, enlarging his silhouette. Nearby, Still’s large 1940 self-portrait, “PH-382,” is painterly, with streaks of color isolated on his face. These portraits exemplify some of the reasons we know and suspect Still repeated images throughout his life: maintaining a complete collection after a sale or loss; in homage to a concept worthy of “more than one stretch of canvas,” as he wrote in a 1972 letter quoted in the Repeat/Recreate catalogue; or returning to a concept, sometimes decades later, to clarify an idea from a new position. The range of personalities of the portraits — from contemplative (“PD-12,” 1929) to jovial (“PH-752,” 1924), in a variety of styles and media — demonstrates that Still was not a slave to any particular aesthetic. Replicating was something he did from the beginning of his career, and then much more so with the passage of time.

By 1942, Still had already transitioned into abstraction. The two awesome, monolithic works “PH-235” and “PH-671” were both completed in 1944 and demonstrate Still’s breakthrough to complete abstraction. The initial concept for the pair was completed in 1943, rendered in oil paint on a 20 by 16 inch piece of paper. Still stated that this small-scale work was complete, but that the idea “demanded to be large.” The CSM’s version, “PH-235,” at 92.5 by 105 inches, features a streak of vermilion paint that rapidly rises and drops like a cliff against a black field. A streak of rich yellow paint crosses the red bolt, and just to the left a bright white dash tucks behind the red. The color and energy the painting carries is relentless and captivating. To its immediate right hangs “PH-671,” on loan from the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA). The vermilion streak is muddied in this version, and the slope of its path straightens into a flat line before it drops to the bottom of the canvas. The rust color could be credited to having spent most of the last 70 years outside of storage — as opposed to “PH-235” — exposed to air and light, or Still’s practice of mixing his own paints and the variations in color and durability that resulted. The most dramatic variation in “PH-671” is the positive space the black field acquires. The black paint bulges forward with the heaping of paint and visible palette knife work, creating a three-dimensional effect. The surface of the painting appears to crack open to reveal a muddy red river beneath. As Still wrote in that same 1972 letter, “although the few replicas I make are usually close to or extensions of the original, each has its special and particular life and is not intended to be just a copy.”

Installation view of ‘Repeat/Recreate’ at the Clyfford Still Museum with “PHX-27” (ca. 1953, left, Clyfford Still Museum © City and County of Denver) and “PH-244” (1953, right, Clyfford Still Museum © City and County of Denver) (click to enlarge)

The dramatic conclusion of Repeat/Recreate grapples with the 1951-T Group, in which there were originally four paintings. The first piece in the series, “PH-815,” was included in MoMA’s important 1952 exhibition Fifteen Americans after the museum rejected Still’s proposed submission of “PH-246” (1951), a 13-foot-wide all-black painting. This rejection was the start of a cantankerous relationship with the institution, which led Still to call it “the great gas chamber of culture on 53rd Street.” Two years after Fifteen Americans, MoMA requested to purchase “PH-815,” but by then Still had destroyed the original, likely due to damage, and had sold its replica (“PH-813”) to a private collector. Still painted a third version for MoMA (“PH-814”) and a fourth (“PH-812) for his own collection. He appeared to favor some versions of the piece over others, referring to “PH-813” as the “parent,” while his widow Patricia Still considered MoMA’s “PH-814” to be “deliberately inferior.” Seeing the three extant versions side-by-side here, the quality of the CSM’s version (“PH-812”) becomes evident, with its rich colors, two maroon lines, and the vertical serpentine streak that is one of Still’s hallmarks. Meanwhile the swirling purple line in “PH-814” appears disjointed from the rest of the composition, especially when compared to the deep, uniform purple in the two adjacent versions.

Installation view of ‘Repeat/Recreate’ at the Clyfford Still Museum with “PH-297” (1938, left, Clyfford Still Museum © City and County of Denver) and “PH-1013” (1938, right, private collection © City and County of Denver) (click to enlarge)

Multiples illuminate Still’s creative process. Scale is not directional, with the second version becoming either larger or smaller. His choice of media, likewise, can at first be oil (“PH-111,” 1952) and then shift to pastels (“PP-135,” 1956), challenging the assumption that oil is the pinnacle of painting. Many Old Masters, most notably Rembrandt, made multiples, and Abstract Expressionists continued this practice. Robert Motherwell’s Elegies to the Spanish Republic series or Willem de Kooning’s Woman series are just a few examples. The myth that Abstract Expressionists were impulsive producers of spontaneous and unique works is debunked by the very presence of duplicates and triplicates. Still once said, “I do not intend to oversimplify — in fact, I revel in the extra-complex.” Like his process, this exhibition is a reminder that an artist’s life’s work is more important than the individual image.

Installation view of ‘Repeat/Recreate’ at the Clyfford Still Museum with “PH-89” (1949, left, private collection © City and County of Denver) and “PH-177” (1949, right, Glenstone) (photo by Tim Nighswander/ © City and County of Denver / ARS, NY)

Repeat/Recreate: Clyfford Still’s “Replicas” continues at the Clyfford Still Museum (1250 Bannock Street, Denver, Colorado) through January 10.

Full disclosure: The author gives public tours of the Clyfford Still Museum once or twice per month.

The Latest

Opportunities in December 2021

From commissions to residencies and fellowships for artists, curators, and teachers, a list of opportunities that artists, writers, and art workers can apply for each month.

Kealey Boyd

Kealey Boyd is an art historian and writer based in Denver.

One reply on “Clyfford Still’s Radical Repetitions”

  1. 1957-J-No. 2

    a woman caused
    $10,000 worth of damage
    to a large expressionist
    painting valued at more than $30 million

    at the

    clyfford still museum
    leaving investigators wondering what provoked carmen tisch
    into punching and scratching then
    removing her pants rubbing
    her butt against and
    sliding down the artwork finally urinating by the Clyfford Still painting

    1957-J-No. 2,


    clyfford still
    summming up his philosophy of art

    I never wanted color to be color texture to be texture
    images to become images
    I wanted them all to fuse into a living spirit

    – vincent zepp

Comments are closed.