Race and ethnicity staff percentages (all images via Diversity in the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs Community, courtesy Department of Cultural Affairs)

Race and ethnicity staff percentages (all images via “Diversity in the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs Community” report, courtesy Department of Cultural Affairs)

This week, New York City’s Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA) released a report showing that the city’s arts sector is not as diverse as the general demographics the city — the fourth most diverse municipality in the US (although still incredibly segregated). Conducted by research firm Ithaka S+R — the folks behind last August’s report on diversity in US art museums — the study looks at categories including race and ethnicity, gender, and age in relation to employment statuses such as job type and job level. The researchers surveyed over 36,000 employees, volunteers, and board members from over 1,000 nonprofit cultural organizations that received DCA funding in the last three years — not only institutions focused on the visual and performing arts, but also the multi-disciplinary and the scientific.

Initiated last summer, the report is the first of its type and is intended to serve as a baseline to measure progress as the DCA works to promote diversity to create a more inclusive cultural sector. While the greatest disparity between New York City’s cultural workforce and its general population lies in the representations of race and ethnicity, the report shows that the gender balance at the staff and board levels is pretty even — 53% female and 47% male — which aligns with the overall gender composition of the city. In terms of race, the staffs of DCA-funded organizations are 62% white non-Hispanic — or 17% points over the city’s overall white non-Hispanic population. Still, the cultural workforce of New York City is on the whole more diverse than its counterparts around the country.

Gender percentage and total

Gender percentage and total

A lot of the resulting data is unsurprising, like the fact that positions in the fields of security and facilities are largely held by mostly men and minorities — a trend the museum diversity report also reflected. On the flip side, women tend to dominate jobs involving community engagement, development, marketing, and public relations, while white non-Hispanics hold down the lion’s share of librarian, curator, and project/exhibition manager positions.

Things get a little more interesting when you look at organizational distribution based on the percentages of women and of white non-Hispanic staff and hone in on the extremities. According to the report, there are 27 organizations that have a 100% female staff and seven that are 100% male; the data for race and ethnicity reveals that 82 organizations are 100% white non-Hispanic, while 73 operate as entirely minority institutions — many of these, the report notes, have a specific ethnic focus.

Perhaps the most interesting insights the report delivers, though, stem from the responses of individuals surveyed — most of whom are between the ages of 25 and 35, were mostly hired in the last five years, and make up the most racially diverse age group among groups that receive DCA funding. As part of the questionnaires researchers sent out, employees were asked about their perspectives on diversity in their own workforces. Of the participants, 69% responded that they either agreed or strongly agreed that their organizations were diverse; 8% disagreed or strongly disagreed, citing socioeconomic and pipeline issues as primary barriers to diversification. Still, 77% of those surveyed said they thought there were no barriers at all to increasing diversity — perhaps reflecting the very same attitudes that will make diversifying the city’s cultural sector difficult.

The report is a major step in the city government’s efforts to actively take a role in improving the demographics of our creative landscape. DCA is also engaging in a number of initiatives, from supporting pipeline programs created by the City University of New York and private philanthropies to funding the Cultural Institutions Group to support projects that directly promote diversity efforts. The DCA plans to issue an open-call for proposals with possible solutions this spring.

Gender by Level of Seniority

Gender by level of seniority

Organizational Distribution by Gender

Organizational distribution by gender, where each column represents the number of organizations that have the corresponding percentage of female staff.

Job Type: Totals and Percent Female

Job type: totals and percent female

Total Staff by Race/Ethnicity Separated by Level of Seniority

Budget totals of organizations in relation to the percentage of female employees hired

Organizational distribution of race/ethnicity based on percentage white non-Hispanic staff

Organizational distribution by race and ethnicity, where each column represents the number of organizations that have the corresponding percentage of white non-Hispanic staff.

Job Type Totals and Percentage White Non-Hispanic

Job type totals and percentage white non-Hispanic

Museum Job Categories over 75% White Non-Hispanic

Museum job categories over 75% white non-Hispanic

Decade Hired Total and Percent White Non-Hispanic

Decade hired total and percent white non-Hispanic

Read the full “Diversity in the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs Community” report here.

The Latest

Claire Voon

Claire Voon is a former staff writer for Hyperallergic. Originally from Singapore, she grew up near Washington, D.C. and is now based in Chicago. Her work has also appeared in New York Magazine, VICE,...

3 replies on “Staff at NYC Arts Organizations Is 62% White, City Report Shows”

  1. Assuming all of New York City museum staff is located in NYC, the question then is whether the museums should reflect the city or the nation’s racial diversity. If NYC, then it’s way off (NYC is 44% white). However, when compared to national demographics its right on (US was 63% in 2012).

  2. So glad this was reported here, but I’m a little surprised that some of the most important statistics aren’t shown here – the overall staff stats are very different from leadership stats – there is very significant difference between overall staff numbers and leadership numbers and talking about the difference between leadership and everybody else is really important because the overall number, in many ways, disguise the actual issue – the leadership of non-profits across the city is very, very skewed. From the report:

    “Leadership of cultural organizations is comprised of 78.68% white non-Hispanic individuals.”

    And even that number disguises a point of particular interest to Hyperallergic readers – the leaders of museums in this city are 85% white.

    That is a very different conversation than the 62% mentioned in the headline, and I wonder if by not reporting that here, people are missing a true picture of the value of this report.

    1. There’s no evidence presented that shows that the given percentage of white arts staffers in NYC is a bad thing. What is the evidence to prove that this is a problem? It could be argued that this type of report fuels racial tensions in our country, which are already high, at present. Surely we can agree that that’s not desirable.

Comments are closed.