A recent decision by trustees of Britain’s Science Museum Group (SMG) to transfer around 400,000 photographs from the National Media Museum (NMM) in Bradford to the Victoria and Albert Museum (V&H) in London has received outcry from over 80 top photographers, curators, museum administrators, and others, who this week published an open letter in the Guardian, calling the migration “a backward step in our understanding of the importance of visual culture.”
Among the 83 signatories are David Hockney, Martin Parr, David Hurn, and art historian Martin Kemp. The group echoes the concerns many others have voiced since SMG’s announcement, namely that a move to London only centralizes the nation’s art institutions and deprives a small city of a historic trove and cultural attraction.
“Moving most of the museum’s photography collection away from Yorkshire goes against government policy when the museum was opened – to put such facilities outside London – and against the present government’s claimed “northern powerhouse” strategy,” the letter reads.
“A number of us who have deposited our photographs in the museum did so specifically because we wanted our work to be preserved in the north.”
The group also proposed a number of possible alternatives to the plan, including the option to make the museum independent or transfer control to Bradford itself, as the city already “owns the building and has spent considerable sums of money on it over the years,” the letter reads.
The Science Museum Group’s trustees have no plans to change their minds, although they have decided to review 85,000 of the objects expected to move. As The Art Newspaper reported, V&A already has plans to double the size of its currently gallery. In the coming years, it also aims to convert one of its wings into a center dedicated to photography, complete with a library and archive. The transfer of the historic photo collection from Bradford, which is scheduled to occur sometime at the end of 2016, may mean that V&A’s own photography collection will be the world’s largest — another huge draw in London for visitors around the world.
A pioneer of street photography, Levitt worked in the most crowded and poorest neighborhoods of New York searching for the theater of everyday life.
Leroy’s canvases seem to be about age and decay — about the process and limits of recollection made manifest.
Graduate students in the University of Denver’s Emergent Digital Practices program work on research with faculty who are engaged directly with their communities, both online and off.
Classes like Anne Willieme’s are part of the burgeoning field of medical humanities, which aims to tackle the disciplinary divide between art and science.
Museums in Austin, Louisville, Madison, Montreal, New Orleans, Tampa, and elsewhere will be joining the program, now in its third year.
Curated by Jill Kearney, this exhibition in Frenchtown, NJ amplifies stories both local and universal with work by Willie Cole, Sandra Ramos, sTo Len, and more.
On the bright side: The feature can be muted!
A recent study has found that AI technology can identify an artist’s brushstrokes with over 90% accuracy.
The first lecture is on the relationship between early portrait photography and diverse notions of US identity during the Gilded Age. Register to attend on January 25.
Join Hyperallergic for an online conversation with Kiowa Tribal Museum Director Tahnee Ahtone on January 25 at 7pm (EST).
This week, Patrisse Cullors speaks, reviewing John Richardson’s final Picasso book, the Met Museum snags a rare oil on copper by Nicolas Poussin, and much more.
Alexi Worth’s paintings demand a double take that allows viewers to look closer and begin dissembling the painting in order to understand what is being looked at.