Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism. Become a Member »

Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.

Visiting the Barnes Foundation was always high on my list of things to do during my next visit to Philadelphia. Unfortunately, I still haven’t managed to make it to Philadelphia—and as of the end of June, the Barnes collection is no longer on view in its legendarily eccentric digs in suburban Merion. A high-profile court ruling a few years ago allowed the cash-strapped Barnes to move to a new location on Benjamin Franklin Parkway in downtown Philadelphia, meaning that all those Renoirs and Cezannes and Picassos will be easier for most audiences to see. But convenience comes at a cost: those who opposed the move rightly argue that the particular ambiance of the Merion location was what made the Barnes collection so special, and even if the works in the new location are hung the same way Dr. Barnes arranged them in the old one, things just won’t quite be the same.

Which is why we should be grateful to the New York Times for at least attempting to preserve a bit of the Barnes as it was in an interactive feature than went online earlier this week. The Times’ virtual version of the Barnes allows visitors to tour four rooms of the Merion building and zoom in on selected works while listening to narration by NYT arts reporter Randy Kennedy. Sure, it might be an even more alien way of looking at the works than Dr. Barnes intended, but for now it’s the next best thing to being there—especially since there’s no “there” there anymore.

The Latest

Required Reading

This week, addressing a transphobic comedy special on Netflix, the story behind KKK hoods, cultural identity fraud, an anti-Semitic take on modern art, and more.

John d'Addario

John D’Addario is a veteran blogger (since 1996), adjunct professor of arts administration at the University of New Orleans, professional arts educator, photographer and man of the world. You can visit...

One reply on “Touring The Barnes Foundation That Was”

  1. I found this link earlier today. I was also sad to hear that the collection was being moved. I had heard of the Barnes before, and I thought it was an interesting concept. Some people in the NYTimes comment section complain about the unrelated bits of metal above the paintings, but I think they’re awesome. The whole collection was just unique as a unit.

Comments are closed.