Gentrification and related issues of rising rents, the paucity of affordable housing, and the astronomical gap between the wealthy and the poor have been appearing in public discourse at an increasing rate, in exhibitions, in public art projects, in organized protests. This is partly due to local issues, which are legion. It’s also due to larger forces, such as the structural shifts within the economy causing income inequality to widen to a chasm. For most working-class people, their lifestyles are no longer comfortable or stable; in fact, many teeter on the edge of financial oblivion. These issues are felt particularly acutely in densely populated urban settings — which compounds the problem, because more of us live in cities now than ever before in human history. To non-wealthy New Yorkers, the situation has started to feel like a crisis.
Into this fray comes Martha Rosler’s exhibition If you can’t afford to live here, mo-o-ove!!, at Mitchell-Innes & Nash. The title is a quotation from former New York City Mayor Ed Koch, who allegedly said this when confronted about the city’s housing problems. The show is full of umbrage, disillusionment, and rage, but also humor and clear-eyed assessment of the entire suite of difficulties involved in housing. The show is said to be the presentation of the Temporary Office of Urban Disturbances, which sounds like an ad hoc name for the group of curators and artists who have helped Rosler revisit her pioneering project If You Lived Here…. Taking place in 1989, If You Lived Here… examined similar themes and was originally shown at the Dia Art Foundation in three parts; the current project is also divided into three parts, the first two of which were shown at the New Foundation Seattle earlier this year.
At Michell-Innes & Nash, the exhibition is full to overflowing. There are posters that read “Displaced,” “Money for Housing and Shelter,” “Housing is a Human Right,” “Affordable for whom?” There are T-shirts with slogans, a map of art galleries throughout the city, photo surveys of the East Village in the 1980s, the Bronx in the ’70s, and Williamsburg from the same time. There is documentation of housing developments in China, Japan, and South Korea that mimic those in Western cities and the legal records of the Campus Housing Alliance’s acquisition of land in Seattle to provide housing for people who are homeless. There are tables with a host of reading material and charts that display statistics regarding income growth at the highest percentiles, the percentage of the population living in poverty, the low-income housing shortfall versus population, the number of shelters for the homeless.
Amid so much visual information, two pieces jumped out at me. “The Annual One Night Count” consists of a blanket with an array of colored strips attached, indicating the total number of people in King County, Washington (which contains Seattle), found to be homeless on a given night each year: 7,980 in 2009. The Brooklyn Laundry Social Club, meanwhile, devised the irreverently funny “Bed Stuy Mapping Game.” It offers a large map and asks users to draw a pink line for a wished-for bike path, a sun for a black-owned business, a blue dot where “sophisticated people” meet, Xs where people are stopped and frisked, and more.
It’s not easy to take in everything here. It would require at least two hours, and then one would still need time to absorb the enormity of information and sit with just how great the need is for decent housing at rates below what the market seems able to bear. Yes, this show, if you have a conscience, should rile you up and expand your understanding, but what happens after that? The answer has to do with a related series of town hall discussions in June that were meant to move the rhetoric off the walls and into praxis. The ultimate goal, one assumes, is the mobilization of people to force action on the part of government, institutions, and key figures who can make policy change. But it remains to be seen whether this exhibition — or any art show at all — can cross over from aesthetic and political commentary to making a difference in people’s lives.
Martha Rosler: If you can’t afford to live here, mo-o-ove!! continues at Mitchell-Innes & Nash (534 W 26th Street, Chelsea, Manhattan) through July 9.
Guggenheim Museum Union Rallies at VIP Opening
The museum’s commitment to diversity in exhibitions rings hollow to workers who say they are not receiving a fair wage.
Special Edition: 🖌️Artists’ Signatures ✍️
In this special edition, we investigate what artists’ signatures actually mean, and the fascinating results reveal the multifaceted history of this curious phenomenon.
The Public Theater Explores the Hurricane Katrina Diaspora in shadow/land
Written by Erika Dickerson-Despenza and directed by Candis C. Jones, this lyrical meditation on legacy, erotic fugitivity, and self-determination is on view in NYC.
What Is a Signature in the Internet Age?
As a cryptographic unit for record-keeping, an NFT can be seen as analogous to a signature or an autograph.
The Meaning of Ancient Greek and Roman Artisan Signatures
What did a signature mean in the ancient world, and how much can we trust what they seem to tell us?
The Rubin Museum Presents Death Is Not the End
Tibetan Buddhist and Christian works of art made across 12 centuries explore death, the afterlife, and the desire to continue to exist. On view in NYC.
Michelangelo’s Signature and the Myth of Genius
Michelangelo served as a stellar example for future artists who sought status and economic independence.
Uncovering the Photographer Behind Arshile Gorky’s Most Famous Painting
As we pursue photographer Hovhannes Avedaghayan a fascinating picture begins to emerge of him and the world of which he was part.
When I Am Empty Please Dispose of Me Properly
Ayanna Dozier, Ilana Harris-Babou, Meena Hasan, Lucia Hierro, Catherine Opie, Chuck Ramirez, and Pacifico Silano explore the myths of the American Dream at Brooklyn’s BRIC House.
100 Years of Artist Signatures in a Detroit Club
The beams in Detroit’s Scarab Club act as a guest book of sorts, carrying a wealth of stories and history, including signatures by Diego Rivera, Marcel Duchamp, Margaret Bourke-White, Isamu Noguchi, and others.
The Myth of Agency Around Artists’ Signatures
In an art world built on shifting sands, artists’ signatures become symbols of agency for some, and relics of the past for others.
Pratt’s 2023 Fine Arts MFA Thesis Exhibition Is On View in Brooklyn
The two-part exhibition features the work of 41 graduating artists across disciplines, including painting, sculpture, printmaking, and integrated practices.
The Women Artists Commemorated on an NYC Sidewalk
The signatures of Rosa Bonheur, Mary Cassatt, and six other historical women artists are engraved on a small stretch of sidewalk on Manhattan’s Upper East Side.
Met Museum Repatriates 15 Objects to India
The sculptures were all at one point sold by the disgraced art dealer Subhash Kapoor.