In order to properly follow up on my experience with Creative Time’s social practice summit, and given my heretofore lack of involvement with #OccupyWallStreet protests, I was pretty much obligated to visit Creative Time’s Living As Form exhibition at the historic Essex Street Market. I mean, the art included, for the most part, is all about progressivism and alternative modes of operating within our faulty society. And community! I love that word, community! As a dutiful citizen of the world, surely taking in an exhibition dedicated to valuing people doing stuff together over commercially-based, materialized practice would amount to me contributing something, somehow. Right?
I arrived at the exhibition space on Sunday too late to participate in one of the Lower East Side walking tours that the Dutch duo Bik Van der Pol had organized for the day. Based on the description of the tours on Creative Time’s exhibition site, the tours are rooted in the history of the neighborhood’s urban development (or lackthereof) and social movements, particularly the Seward Park Urban Renewal Area. I also caught the middle of the Barter 101 workshop and didn’t want to interrupt to join. I felt guilty for missing such obvious opportunities for conversation and learning, but there was still so much more to experience, and can’t I be a good person just for having gone?
My first stop was at the OurGoods booth, which is heavily papered with flyers with requests and offers for goods and services, each sheet with little rip-off tabs of contact information. Along with the non-competitive MARKET set up by Chicago-based group Temporary Services, among other practices that encourage bartering or collective pooling of resources, I considered these efforts as in alignment with the protesters at Wall Street, as they resist out of control capitalism by creating spaces for alternative economies. I took a few tabs with the intentions of emailing the individuals to help them with their projects, feeling determined to help, if limited in my means to do so.
I nodded appreciatively at the bare-bones aesthetic: larger project and social booths are constructed from cinderblocks, while smaller projects consisting of books, photos and videos are displayed on industrial steel shelving units, like the kind you could buy at a hardware or restaurant-supply store. No efforts were made to hide the decay of the building. Paint peels off the walls and the cold cement floor is splotchy and exposed. Several videos are shown in pre-existing structures within the building, what could have been storage rooms or perhaps refrigeration units.
From the outside, the building looks unkempt, perhaps abandoned, until you notice the spiffy Creative Time sandwich boards and Carolina Caycedo’s neon installation “Blessings” above the Essex Street entrance. The whole exhibition functions like a site-specific installation, with many references to the Seward Park Urban Renewal Area and other elements of the social history of the area.
As I wandered alone around the space, I retreated further into passivity. Overwhelmed by the variety and quantity of projects included – the website boasts over one hundred – I found it easy to just skim the texts and half-heartedly watch videos. I was jolted out of my headspace when the men from Thin Air Cable, dedicated to poetry DVD distribution, attempted to engage me in conversation. As I nervously stammered and shuffled away from them, failing to even get their names, I became suddenly self-conscious of my willingness for detachment. I wanted to walk around the exhibition space quietly and alone. I wanted to continue pick up the free newspapers and zines at my leisure, knowing full well I’d likely keep them without reading much and eventually stack them in the recycling bin. I wanted to keep enjoying the fact of being there without the responsibility to actually say or do anything.
These desires for solitariness seem out of line with the driving values of community and participation central to the exhibition. “Whose fault is this?” I wondered. Do I blame myself for not being open and actively participating, or the artists for not effectively inspiring the will to participate?
The projects range from those where participation can be immediate, like Mel Chin’s Fundred Dollar Bill campaign, where exhibition visitors can create their own bills on location or online to contribute to the larger appeal to Congress for lead-free soil in New Orleans, to Fallen Fruits’s comment-emblazoned jam jars, the counter-reaction to the reaction of previous activities of theirs in Los Angeles. This broad scope of engagement is ambitious, but presents a challenge: are visitors meant to consider each included project as a document of its occurrence, or as the thing itself? Are visitors implicated by the choices they make regarding participation at the exhibition, or does the responsibility fall on the artists? Or is it the responsibility of the curator for providing the context? Are we all necessarily implicated by virtue of claiming citizenship of the world?
When “living as form” is the overarching philosophy, and life becomes art, it seems to follow that art also becomes life. Taking in art is what we are doing, and thus, what we are living. The safe distance of criticality is shortened when participation is a key element of the work. This contrasts greatly with the passive manner in which I’ve been previously, unknowingly trained to experience art: it is created and we see it, and the most active aspect of the process as a viewer is of interpretation. For many of these socially engaged works, interpretation, my consideration of the piece, is almost beside the point. The point is less what the artwork makes one think or feel, but rather what those resulting thoughts and emotions make one do.
I’ve been so used to expectation of experiencing an exhibition somewhat passively that I ended up experiencing Living As Form as a historicizing exhibition and less of a platform for on-going practice. While it’s important to value these projects through historicization, however complicated that may be, the impetus is also there for some of these included projects, especially the tours and workshops and barter stations, to be the living projects in action. Living As Form functions dually, challenging pre-standing conventions in curating and viewership simply by incorporating these socially challenging practices.
The question of displaying work so ephemeral or intangible revisits concerns of documenting performance art from a generation ago. However, unlike their predecessors, the dematerialized form itself isn’t the institutional critique, although institutional critique is a part of many of these works. The resulting exchanges post-barter, the knowledge gleaned from a conversation or workshop, the appeal for legislation, the public grounds analyzed or reclaimed – these effects of the form are the critique, are the artwork. Exploring these forms and topics in such a forum is not new, but continues to remain relevant as public practice and curatorial projects with discursive platforms continue to gain currency.
I can’t give myself any “good person” or “active politicized citizen” points just for having visited Living As Form, but at least the exhibition gave me the space and food for thought to challenge my hypocritical passivity. It’s still not too late to actually do something.
Creative Time’s Living as Form continues until October 16 at the historic Essex Street Market (southeast corner of Essex and Delancey Streets, Lower East Side, Manhattan).
Did You Know These Museums Were Free for New Yorkers?
The “Free Admission” campaign is advocating to make ticket pricing information more transparent to visitors, who may be confused or misled by institutions’ language.
AI Images Visualizing Trump’s Arrest Send Internet Into a Frenzy
The pictures, created using Midjourney, depict the former president’s greatest fantasy: being dragged away by police in front of the cameras.
Haggerty Museum of Art Presents Tomás Saraceno in Dialogue With Dr. Somesh Roy
The artist and researcher will explore soot’s effects on climate change and public health in this online conversation.
Some AI Artworks Now Eligible for Copyright
New guidance from the US Copyright Office sets some policies around AI-generated images.
NYC Hispanic Society Workers to Strike Indefinitely
One worker said the museum’s “skeletal” workforce bars the institution from functioning to its potential.
McKnight Visual Artist Fellows Discussion Series at the Minneapolis Institute of Art
The series features 2021 Fellows David Bowen, Mara Duvra, Rotem Tamir, Ben Moren, and Dyani White Hawk in conversation with renowned curators and critics.
In Search of Inclusive South Asian Futurisms
We have been dangerously siloed for far too long by colonial constructs of race, nation, and time that separate, divide, and deny us our very being.
What Do Shtreimels and Cowboy Hats Have in Common?
A chance meeting on the subway introduced photographer Francesca Magnani to the multicultural world of Brooklyn milliner Richard Faison.
Nevada Museum of Art Presents Adaline Kent: The Click of Authenticity
For the first time in nearly 60 years, the innovative yet under-recognized artist is the subject of a retrospective exhibition. On view in Reno, Nevada.
Richard Hull Completes the Picture
Once known for his abstracted portraits, the Chicago artist is now exploring new directions.
You Too Can Have Your Art on a Postage Stamp
The process isn’t complicated, and thousands of people submit themselves for the talent pool every year.
The Public Theater in NYC Presents Plays for the Plague Year
Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright Suzan-Lori Parks’s theatrical concert chronicles the 2020 lockdown and the hope and perseverance that emerged from it.
Bobby Wilson Combats Indigenous Stereotypes Through Humor
The artist-performer’s career undulates, ever so gracefully, across multiple mediums and registers of generational pain, healing laughter, and Indigenous joy.
Rare 19th-Century Silhouette Album’s Secrets Unlocked
Traveling portrait artist William Bache’s album depicts famous figures like Thomas Jefferson as well as people whose identity was previously unknown.
I think you acknowledge what people who are stuck in materiality can’t: relational aesthetics is common practice today. Some galleries might specialize in it without even knowing it. I mean, if Dan Colen being shown at Gagosian isn’t an example of this then I don’t know what is, because his works sucks, and maybe people who are a bit older might not realize his personality sucks too. I remember a Ken Johnson facebook update that read “Should artists who specialize in relational aesthetics be called ‘relational aestheticians’ or ‘glorified party planners?'” or something to that effect, which I thought was great. I think Jen Dalton’s recent show bridged the material / immaterial gap well by presenting facts about mass broadcast media in ways that resemble infographics. The opening wasn’t just a party, the work guided the discussion, which seems to be what you experienced above. As a side note, a generation raised on the Internet is going to have less of an interest in reviving physicality from its current status as a sun-bleached skeleton. It can viewed differently now, casting it in a new light, but should no longer be considered more viable just because someone can take it home.
I’m probably a little late to comment here, but the essay is well stated, I could relate to exactly your frame of mind, though I haven’t seen the show. But having been part of the generation that applied the whole anti-establishment and barter practices to our lives pretty seriously, by actually giving away our belongings and moving to communes, I often wonder why we were so motivated. And I think it had to do with a few things that made our choices toward change so urgent. 1) the military draft. 2) the civil rights era, where basic freedom and people’s lives were at stake. 3) we were taking hallucinogens, which provided a fairly common and intensely real vision of the unity of humanity. 4) Kent State. So there was a desperation driving the idealism. As an artist now, I don’t want to take creativity out of activism…but I can live without the activism IN art. The “blurring” of art and life that everyone talks about is ok I guess, but I often prefer the distinctions.
Why do you find the distinctions though? Do you find the blurriness belies a lack of desperation?
First, I’m open and watching what happens via OWS…There is a degree of desperation which is great, and of course artists will be active, as both citizens, and art makers. But the socialization I hope for in many areas of life…health care, education etc…are not so simply applied in the arts. Calling everything “art”…can open up a can of worms. I think people want and need levels of judgement and discretion to feed the drive and challenge to achieve. The competitive spirit seems innate. I’m happy that everything is on the table…currently…and maybe there’s a new model taking form as we speak…
Comments are closed.