Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.
The long dispute over the proposed sale of dozens of works from the collection of the Berkshire Museum ended today, with a Massachusetts court siding with advocates for the sale. This afternoon, Justice David A. Lowy of the Supreme Judicial Court of Suffolk County approved a petition submitted by museum leadership in February, with the support of Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, as the Berkshire Eagle first reported.
“This is great news for the people of Berkshire County and everyone who visits the Berkshire Museum for one-of-a-kind experiences in history, art, and science,” Elizabeth McGraw, chairman of the Berkshire Museum’s Board of Trustees, said in a statement sent to Hyperallergic. “We recognize this decision may not please those who have opposed the museum’s plans. Still, we hope people will be able to move forward in a constructive way to help us secure and strengthen the future of this museum, at a time when our community needs it more than ever.”
As many as 40 artworks from the collection of the museum, which is based in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, are now cleared to be sold at Sotheby’s, potentially bringing the museum as much as $55 million. The museum’s administration claimed the sales were necessary not only in order to right the institution’s financials — it has apparently been operating at an annual deficit of $1.15 million — but also to implement its $20-million “New Vision” program, shifting the museum’s emphasis toward science, technology, and more interactive exhibits.
Today’s decision did not sit well with members of the Berkshire community who had opposed the sale, including the citizen group Save the Art – Save the Museum (STA-STM), one of the most visible and vocal groups against the deaccessioning.
“STA-STM continues to oppose the sale and the unrestricted use of the resulting funds,” Leslie Ferrin, a member of the group who runs the North Adams-based gallery Ferrin Contemporary, told Hyperallergic. “We deeply regret the the judge’s decision to disregard the public trust and the importance of future consequences from this sale on public collections. As a group, we will make a more detailed statement after meeting in person to consider the loss to our community, the impact from the results of this decision, and future actions.”
At the outset, the foremost opponents of the sale were Thomas, Jarvis, and Peter Rockwell, the sons of Norman Rockwell, who opposed the sale of their father’s painting “Shuffleton’s Barbershop” (1950). That work, which the artist gifted to the museum in 1958, was expected to account for the lion’s share of the auction revenue, with a pre-sale estimate of $20 to 30 million. However, the Rockwells dropped their opposition to the sale in February after an agreement was reached to keep “Shuffleton’s Barbershop” on public view.
“While we are disappointed with the Court’s decision, we believe that our clients raised important questions concerning the Museum’s decision to sell the art which are not only important to the citizens of Berkshire County but also to the art world in general,” said attorney Michael Keating of Foley Hoag LLP, who represented the Rockwell heirs and other opponents of the sale. “Our clients hope that the Museum has a successful future, considering the enormous cost the Museum and the citizens of Berkshire County will incur by the sale of its art collection. We note that the Court’s decision encourages the Museum to sell its art in ways which preserve public access to that art and we hope that the Museum adheres to that suggestion.”
The museum and Sotheby’s New York headquarters were the sites of protests last fall. At the time, a judge had halted the sale just days before the first works were scheduled to hit the auction block. Now, the sales can resume.
“We are very pleased that the court approved the agreement reached between The Berkshire Museum and the Massachusetts Attorney General,” a spokesman for Sotheby’s told Hyperallergic. “We look forward to working with the museum to ensure a bright future for the people of Pittsfield and western Massachusetts.”
It’s not yet known when the first deaccessioned works from the Berkshire Museum collection will hit the auction block. The pieces slated for sale include two paintings by Albert Bierstadt, two sculptures by Alexander Calder, a Rembrandt Peale portrait of George Washington, a Francis Picabia watercolor, a Frederic Edwin Church landscape, and a 1942 pastel by Henry Moore.
“Black infants in America are now more than twice as likely to die as white infants—11.3 per 1,000 black babies, compared with 4.9 per 1,000 white babies, according to the most recent government data—a racial disparity that is actually wider than in 1850, 15 years before the end of slavery, when most black women were…
he ownership of images has a long and nuanced legal history, which has evolved dramatically in recent years as cultural standards and photographic technologies have rapidly advanced
The show, which honors the 50th anniversary of an exhibition history once ignored, continues a series of projects documenting Wilmington’s contemporary art scene.
Renty and his daughter Delia. Renty was an enslaved African, kidnapped from the Congo, sold and forced into slave labor on the South Carolina plantation of B.F. Taylor
What is the relation between possessing a person, possessing their image, and dispossessing their progeny
As a scholar of African American history and photography whose work has focused on the status of violent images in museums and archives, I fully support the validity of Ms. Tamara Lanier’s claim and the amicus brief.
Two K-12 art teachers will each receive a $1,000 cash gift and an additional $500 to put toward classroom art supplies. Nominations are due October 31.
The daguerreotypes of Renty Taylor, Delia, Drana, Alfred, Jack, George Fassena, and Jem remained in an unused storage cabinet until 1975, when it was discovered by an employee of the Peabody Museum.
I am writing in support of the amicus curiae brief submitted by Professor Ariella Aïsha Azoulay of Brown University for the full restitution of the daguerreotypes of Renty Taylor and his daughter Delia, currently held by Harvard University, to their familial descendant, Tamara Lanier.
We cannot be indifferent to the long-lasting effects of photography. The photographs at the center of Lanier v. Harvard are relentless in making Renty and Delia Taylor work and perform as slaves. The pain inflicted on them has not ceased. Photography has the capacity to propagate harm, and we have the moral obligation to interrupt…