As a supplement to “Why Are (Most) Artists (So Fucking) Poor?” here is some of the data from the 2010 W.A.G.E. survey of payments received by artists who exhibited with nonprofit art institutions in New York City between 2005 and 2010.
All images courtesy W.A.G.E. and all images can be clicked to view a larger version.
The Latest
Museums Can Use Deaccessioning Funds for Collection Care, AAMD Says
The Association of Art Museum Directors announced a shift in its longstanding policy, which restricted the use of funds from sales of art to new acquisitions only.
Collector Who Says He Burned Frida Kahlo Work for NFT Under Investigation
Martín Mobarak may have broken Mexican law, but he burned the proof.
Social Fabric: Art and Activism in Contemporary Brazil
Artists reflect on histories of oppressive power structures in Brazil in this exhibition at the Visual Arts Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
Your Concise Los Angeles Art Guide for October 2022
Your list of must-see, fun, insightful, and very Los Angeles art events this month, including the Maya Codex of Mexico at the Getty, Beatrice Wood, Trenton Doyle Hancock, and more.
Your Concise New York Art Guide for October 2022
Your list of must-see, fun, insightful, and very New York art events this month, including Xaviera Simmons, Cristina Iglesias, Mire Lee, and more.
Camille Walala’s “Ice and a Slice” Takes Over XNA Airport
Visible from the sky, a bold new installation signals that art is a part of everyday life in Bentonville, Arkansas.
The Joyous Kitsch and Lingering Simmer of Nick Cave’s Art
With explosions of color and materiality, Cave has his own enigmatic ways to funnel the funk through histories of adversity.
Kapwani Kiwanga Uses Daylight to Expose Racial Surveillance
Kapwani Kiwanga invites viewers to look with only the quiet glow of natural light seeping in through the skylights, illuminating a nuanced way of seeing race.
Come Study at the University at Buffalo’s MFA and MA Programs
Funding options at UB include full-tuition scholarships for MFA students, the Arthur A. Schomburg Fellowship Program, and additional opportunities for MA students.
Required Reading
This week, Godard’s anti-imperialism, in defense of “bad” curating, an inexplicable statue, criminalizing culture wars, and more.
We Asked AI to Re-Imagine 5 Blue-Chip Art Exhibitions
I inserted the text from five press releases into DALL-E and this is what it churned out.
The Artists Amplifying the Voices of Iran’s Protesters
As protests rage across the country following the death of Mahsa (Zhina) Amini, Iranian and Kurdish artists are creating work in support of freedom.
Nature of the business, just like acting. It takes years of non-pay work to develop one’s skills, so it’s not like accounting, where you get a degree, then you go out and get a job. Unfortunately, it’s the way the art world is set up. And unfortunately, most artists are terrible business people, and even when they should be getting paid, or paid more, they still let themselves be taken advantage of. An accountant doesn’t necessarily care about the quality of his work when he’s on payroll, but he does want to get paid for the hours he works. An artists does the reverse, and that’s ripe to be taken advantage of.
It doesn’t need to be the nature of the business. The nature of business in general is the exploitation of one for the benefit of the other. Just because it is, doesn’t mean it should be.
Interesting. When Edison invented the phonograph and movie camera the productivity of musicians and actors increased phenomenally. Indeed, I know of no industry with greater productivity gains in human history, ever. Industries quickly arose around controlling the distribution of the recordings, hence in the last hundred years these have been very well paid professions for the first time in history (excluding those periods where it was fashionable for rich patrons to keep entertainers on retainer).
By contrast visual artists like painters seem to have dropped the ball on controlling the distribution of the images they create. Perhaps it’s because the technology for reproducing art is so much older than the turn of the twentieth century: It arose in a time when the mechanisms for creating capitalist industries was less developed than in 1890s America.
The tide may be turning again. Technology is making it increasingly difficult to control the distribution of music and movies despite those industries’ best efforts, meaning that actors and musicians may be returning to their historical norm of middling prosperity to poverty. Like artists.
I think it’s really interesting if you look at the two Artists Fee by Size of Organization charts back to back. It was more common for artists to receive fees for performances and lectures than for exhibitions. Artists’ time and work seem to matter to orgs if they’re passing in house, but the time and work that go into a painting that then hangs for weeks or months doesn’t.
Here is a remarkable article. It is funny and comical and very sad indeed. It speaks volumes about this topic. http://www.e-flux.com/journal/politics-of-art-contemporary-art-and-the-transition-to-post-democracy/
I’m surprised no one has commented about the fact that small-medium orgs. seem to have scored better than larger institutions. Having worked at orgs. of multiple sizes, my experience is that the small-medium have career cultivation in their missions. They purposely work fees into their missions and budgets. Larger institutions like museums don’t get this specific about what fine details their missions might entail. They almost always have less complete understandings of their missions than the smaller orgs., which make these details almost irrelevant for them. This major difference is not so much due to art world conventions, but the realities of non-profit leadership and engagement with mission. The bigger institutions have a harder time getting this right in general.