You have to wonder if something is edgy anymore if a fashion label can quickly flip the “transgression” into merchandise within a few days.
Early last week, graffiti writer Kidult expressed himself on the front of the Marc Jacobs shop in downtown Manhattan and tweeted the image with a question:
The same week the clever people at Marc Jacobs took the lemons they were handed and turned it into lemonade — yes, they created a tshirt (which retails for $689) to document the “art” on the front of their store:
While Kidult is obviously not happy, the people at Jacobs clearly came out on top … and strangely the tshirt fits perfectly into the brand’s taste for tongue-in-cheek self-criticality.
Btw, now another site has just gone meta with the whole thing and produced their own tshirt of the tshirt … and their version retails for only $35.
Kidult’s Twitter page proclaims that the “Revolution will not be Televised” but it does appear to be prone to merchandising.
h/t Henry Chalian
They Managed to Mess Up an Art Heist Movie
There must be a lesson in Vasilis Katsoupis’s film Inside about the vacuousness of the art market or the claustrophobia of exhibition spaces — I just don’t care.
Ten Painful Stories of the Dutch Colonial Slave Trade
The Rijksmuseum’s traveling show strives to remind us that we are all, in some way, a part of this chapter of human history, whose legacy continues today.
The Milton Resnick and Pat Passlof Foundation Presents The Feminine in Abstract Painting
Curated by Jennifer Samet and Andrea Belag, this group exhibition in NYC explores the feminine through aesthetics, as opposed to identity or gender.
Textured Histories at Shiprock Santa Fe
The Santa Fe gallery features Indigenous textiles and jewelry from the early 19th century to today.
Renaissance Portrait of “Ugly Duchess” Likely Depicts a Man
A curator at London’s National Gallery believes the subject of painter Quinten Massys’s painting “is most likely a he.”
NYU Steinhardt Opens 2023 MFA Thesis Exhibitions
Taking place at 80WSE Gallery in New York’s Greenwich Village, Part I is on view from late March through April while Part II opens in May.
Hokusai’s “Great Wave” Makes a Splash at Auction
An edition of the iconic woodblock print broke records when it sold for $2.8M this week.
MTV’s The Exhibit Is Back With an Inflatable Dolphin
Episode four, in which artists tackled themes of justice and injustice, was the most lifeless of the reality TV show so far.
Miniature Worlds: Joseph Cornell, Ray Johnson, Yayoi Kusama
Through small-scale works, this exhibition at the Katonah Museum of Art in New York examines Cornell’s prominent role in the lives and careers of Johnson and Kusama.
Florida Principal Ousted Over “Pornographic” Michelangelo Sculpture
Parents complained that the famous sculpture was shown to their sixth graders.
Tickets to Sold-Out Vermeer Show Are Going for Hundreds
The online resale market for the Rijksmuseum’s smash exhibition is booming, with tickets selling on eBay for over $2K.
The Wider World and Scrimshaw
On March 28, join the New Bedford Whaling Museum online and in-person for a symposium on global carving traditions from across the Pacific Rim.
Three Looted Antiquities at the Met Repatriated to Turkey
Nine other repatriated works were seized from Met Trustee Shelby White, whose collection was subject to a criminal investigation.
This week, the world’s lightest paint, Pakistan’s feminist movement, World Puppy Day, and were some of Vermeer’s paintings created by his daughter?
anyone think that this was planned in advance by both parties?
Someone suggested that but do we have proof? Can’t find any. Do you know of any?
nope and i don’t suspect that anyone from either side would ever admit to paying / planning either – just seems so awfully convenient and well played by everyone except for kidult.
The fact that he didn’t play it well makes me think it wasn’t planned.
But on the other hand it does kind of look like this.
mmmmn – who knows – i think that if it was planned out in advance by marc / kidult they probably didn’t tell him the whole plan – it was just here’s some cash, come by the store tonight and do your thing, make sure it reads ART
Kidult just posted his own shirt of a photo of him actually painting the piece in white and a similar pink to the marc shirt. maybe it is to prove they are not in cahoots.
It is in a very Marc Jacobs kind of color. Hmmmmmm…. Thanks for sharing Hrag!
If we are to suppose that Kidult and Marc Jacobs colluded in making what now—by appropriation—is the end product (the t-shirt), then the artist’s intent is obviously the same as March Jacobs; which can be chalked up to clever marketing for profit. However, if this is not the case, then there are a few serious problems that we—especially in the context of post-modernism—have to reconcile with. One being the difficulty in discerning the primary meaning of art in an age that simultaneously defines art with wide-open ambiguity and relativity, while also possessing an unprecedented level of advertising and marketing. With both of these conditions present, both the artist and the viewer will be inhibited in their art-making and/or art-experiencing practices: everything comes to suit the needs of whoever owns the most capital. Notice that what was discussed predominantly was the t-shirt, and now—even if we wish to discuss Kidult—it is a permanent context for the possible art work.
I think that whole sequence of events is pretty hilarious, and pure art all around… thanks for sharing this! No offense to Liz, but I seriously doubt that either side looks at the situation with such lack of humor, nor through such academic glasses.
anyone that would pay that kind of money for a freakin tshirt, is INSANE and should be removed immediately of the rest of their money so it doesn’t go to crap like this.
The shirt of the shirt is an awesome result of this whole ordeal!
Irony and humor are definitely present, and my statement is not dismissing that. Rather, I just posed a question to be considered. Irony can only go on for so long
I still like Neckface better. He sold in!
> Available now for $689. Signed by the artist, $680.
Ouch, that’s gotta leave a mark (or marc).
Thanks Hrag for sharing but as HYPERALLERGIC grows I’ve soured to such grand standing. Both Kidult and MJ are using each other, knowingly. Planned or not. Look at your own financial sponsors. Do you know their motives? Take for example Artist Wanted. Their terms alone — http://www.artistswanted.org/self/info.php — should raise a red flag. HYPERALLERGIC has to make a living so I understand ad revenue but art and money do funny things to each other.
I blame you completely for this meta assimilation
Publicity stunt or not, that is too damn funny.
Comments are closed.