You know the tired old cliche about LA sprawl? It appears to be true about the city’s art world.
Artist Zach Alan has superimposed Manhattan (highlighting the Chelsea gallery district — 23rd to 34th Streets and Ninth to Eleventh Avenues — in red) to demonstrate how it is virtually impossible to wander to see gallery art in LA, unlike in New York. Each of those location markers indicate a gallery, art nonprofit, museum or space with an art program.
Density is certainly working against LA’s favor in terms of an art scene.
Original LA gallery map via Culver City Gallery Guide
In terms of what art scene? The uber-commercial one of NYC or the diversity-oriented one of LA? Art sprawl nurtures the nooks and crannies, whether it’s design market of West Hollywood, illustration vernacular in NELA, or blue-chip in Culver City. Should get out more often.
I guess you don’t know NYC, since the LA scene is certainly not as diverse as the one here. Upper East Side, 57th St, LES, Bushwick, Dumbo (I’m not even half done), or have you never ventured outside Chelsea? It’s funny you’re trying to school someone though. Btw, the map is made by someone in LA.
But the map of Manhattan with Chelsea colored in makes the New York scene look more compact than it is. At the very least, he should have superimposed Brooklyn over LA as well.
that LA is sprawling is not a tired old cliche, it’s a fact. So I don’t see why this is much of a shocker. Everybody’s used to driving everywhere anyway, so I don’t think they’re aware of really missing anything when it comes to “wandering to see gallery art”.
I think most galleries would say that density helps sales (think of the concept of the “arcade,” “mall” or “souk” since people go to buy where there is concentration. I have had LA friends complain that bouncing around openings, like people do in NY, is much harder there. Again, it’s not a question of quality but a question of different art cultures and commercial realities.
Hmm, I kind of doubt if a Chelsea gallery’s foot traffic has much of an effect on its sales. Most people wandering into Pace Gallery probably aren’t buying. In any case, people in LA, in my experience, have less of a problem driving to multiple neighborhoods to go to openings. Consider, on the other hand, if you’re out going to openings in Chelsea and then you suggested to someone, “hey, let’s go check out this other opening. It’s in Queens.” Really, imagine the look on his/her face. That’s not happening. In LA, however, if you’re checking out openings in Culver City, and someone says, hey let’s go to Chinatown, you just get in the car and go. You don’t even think about how far it is. People treat space and distance differently there. But maybe your LA friends have different attitudes than mine. In any case, I totally agree that it’s not an issue of quality, but it’s about different (art) cultures, as you say. But in your article there’s this implication that they suffer for not being able to wander around galleries as much, (ie. a lack of quality of life)… Anyways, I was just disappointed because I thought this article was going to have some actual information in it.
If you doubt the density argument then perhaps you don’t realize how much business goes on in art fairs. Proximity is a MAJOR factor, ask any small gallery. Also, there is tons of info, but perhaps not what you were specifically looking for.
Hrag, but to your point — the representation of the two scenes is not accurate. The map is comparing Chelsea to all of LA. How about mapping Newark (and rest of NJ), Long Island, Brooklyn, and the Bronx and reveal that the art-sprawl is not limited to LA. Metropolitan NY art scene has been dispersing from a single-central model for a quite a while now.
I agree, Fabian. But the point I think is more about there are 250+ galleries in that one red square than all of LA. There certainly are other galleries neighborhoods, but the point was one of density. I think it’s an interesting contrast. It’s not a statement about quality.
I understand, but I don’t think the NY art world is as concentrated as it once was and if anything, we are more like the sprawl in LA now. Bushwick and LES is our Chinatown. The remaining galleries in SoHo are our Bergemot Station. PS1 anchors LIC. Yes, the concentration of galleries in Chelsea is way higher than anything in Culver City, but NYC also has way more galleries than LA (We probably have more galleries in LES than all of LA).
Who cares? We have cars here in LA you know…
LOL … I like your attitude!
What these maps prove is that it’s a lot easier to get hammered on free wine in New York than LA.
Alas, no one serves alcohol the way they used to. If LA galleries switch the martinis at openings, I’m moving. #FYI
Oh boy … beware the cheap art martini. This was Milwaukee, but still:
Haha – the maps don’t lie. That was one of my observations too.
So no one does the “long arc” but you, this is essentially what you’re saying. Whats your bank acct number? I’ll transfer some gas money into it for your pains. 🙂 happy driving!
Zack, Comments that attack commenters will not be tolerated.
I’m out. enough with the dmn trolls.
Wow! Everyone is so bitter. As someone born & raised in LA, I’d love to see even just a single street peppered with more than three spaces dedicated to arts, literature, and indie/community film. We have a lot of awesome spaces here, but nothing concentrated…and there is just something inherently special about walking from place to place, rather than driving. The art walks in Canoga Park and Downtown do make up for the lack, though!
Good post. A response, of sorts, here: http://www.lataco.com/taco/nyc-has-art-gallery-density-la-does-not-but-does-it-matter Short version- it’s not the sprawl that is the issue, it’s that the areas where galleries do cluster just aren’t big/diverse/mature enough… yet.
This as a ‘piece’ is a little ‘eh’, but as a provocation is awesome. I mean, it’s obvious that LA is more sprawled than NY…I mean, the Census data will confirm it. The only issue is that this article postulates that denser is better, or…bigger is worse? And that’s largely because of the use of an idiomatic expression in a literal sense. We’re talking about length vs. girth? C’mon bro, namaste. Also, I really like that Mr. Vartanian is serious about the moderator game here. Hrag, you’re taking this like it’s a panel! You get mad love on that. Big ups.
Comments are closed.