Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism. Become a member today »

Lady Gaga sleeping at the Guggenheim (screen shot via YouTube)

Lady Gaga hosted the last big party of fashion week on September 14 by creating “Sleeping With Gaga,” a performance that has uncomfortable similarities with Canadian-Ukranian artist Taras Polataiko’s recent Sleeping Beauty. After drawing a lot of international press and attention, his modern-day fairytale closed at the National Art Museum of Ukraine in Kiev on September 9, five days before her one-night-only performance took place at the Guggenheim Museum in New York.

Fairytales are continually updated to comment on the current times. Gaga used “Sleeping Beauty” to discuss the state of celebrity in the internet age, whereas Polataiko commented not only on the political state of “sleeping” Ukraine post–Orange Revolution but also on the possibilities of a queered fairytale.

In Gaga’s rendition, the mega pop star wore a black dress rather than a classic white one, as in Polataiko’s project. Gaga slept for an hour Thursday evening, positioned on a black raised bed inside a giant mock-up bottle of her new fragrance, Lady Gaga Fame. Outside of the bottle and inside the museum, people spritzed each other with samples of Fame. Visitors were allowed to touch Gaga only through a porthole in the bottle. Her performance was live-streamed, just like Polataiko’s.

One of Polataiko’s Sleeping Beauties at the museum in Ukraine (screen shot via YouTube)

In his Sleeping Beauty, a rotation of Ukranian women dressed in white dresses slept on a raised bed inside the museum. Polataiko both guarded the women and documented the performance. Visitors to the exhibition could kiss the women as long as they had signed a contract stating that if a beauty awoke to his or her kiss, the two must marry. In fact, one of the beauties is now on her way to marrying another woman. Lady Gaga, protected inside of her giant perfume bottle of Fame, awoke on her own. Did Lady Gaga rip off of Taras Polataiko?

I spoke with the artist to get his thoughts on this pop culture appropriation of his work. In art, after all, it’s usually the other way around.

Alicia Eler: When you conceived of the Sleeping Beauty project, did you forsee the sort of global success it has attained?

Taras Polataiko: No. I thought it was going to be a normal art show. I was hoping to get a review or two in the art magazines. It’s a very quiet and gentle show after all.

AE: Are you a fan of Lady Gaga’s music? What type of message do you feel this appropriation sends to her fans?

TP: To be honest, I don’t know her music. I know it probably sounds strange and I don’t want to be rude, but it is true. I live a pretty solitary life, and I don’t watch TV or listen to the radio. My musical taste is pretty far from that type of music. I listen to Erik Satie and Tom Waits. I don’t know what message she’s sending, but she’s sending a live stream, just like I did. Surprising? I guess it is surprising in its obviousness. Imitation is the best form of flattery.

AE: Do you feel like Lady Gaga stole your concept? 

TP: From what I read in the link a friend sent to me, she was just sleeping in some sort of perfume bottle, and the whole purpose of this “performance” was to sell that new perfume. This is as far from my concept as it can possibly be. There is no money in my piece. Everyone participated voluntarily. It was very important for me ethically and magically. Money spoils the fairytale.

AE: Andy Warhol and Richard Prince became famous for incorporating images from pop culture into their art. What happens when the idea flips and pop culture appropriates an artist’s work? 

TP: When artists like Andy Warhol and Richard Prince appropriate pop imagery, it makes you think about the nature of art, images, and their circulation and hierarchy. These artists are making you think about things you wouldn’t have thought about without knowing their work. When pop culture appropriates the work of an artist, there’s nothing left to think about. It’s just sad. It vulgarizes the beauty and the gentle complexity of art. It dumbs it down.

There’s a difference between banal theft and sensitive homage to another artist. The first one kills the beauty and fragility of the original by using its most obvious features without any understanding of its essence. The second one pays homage to the original and takes it further. It preserves the essence of the original and shows something new about it, making us think about it again and again. In short, the first one kills art. The second one extends its life. It’s a difference between brutality and gentleness.

AE: Will you talk to Lady Gaga about this? 

TP: I’ve spent all my money making Sleeping Beauty, and I can’t afford the lawyer. And I’m not good at attacking people. I just want to make more good art, and I hope that life will sort things out.

AE: Where do you want to take Sleeping Beauty next? 

TP: It would make sense to show it at the Guggenheim now.

Support Hyperallergic

As arts communities around the world experience a time of challenge and change, accessible, independent reporting on these developments is more important than ever. 

Please consider supporting our journalism, and help keep our independent reporting free and accessible to all.

Become a Member

Alicia Eler

Alicia Eler is a cultural critic and arts reporter. She is the author of the book The Selfie Generation (Skyhorse Publishing), which has been reviewed in the New York Times, WIRED...

11 replies on “Did Lady Gaga Rip Off Artist Taras Polataiko?”

  1. I guess someone has to finally say it… just because she is weird does not mean that a manufactured pop star is actually an artist.

  2. It is unbelievable that after Hyperallergic did such a good job reporting on how Lady Gaga’s window display at Barney’s was a rip-off of similar window displays by the artist Colette in the 1970s and 80s, that you can now miss that Gaga is ripping-off — not Taras Polataiko — but
    Colette once again. Colette’s trademark in the late 70s were sleeping pieces like her 1978 performance sleeping in the window of Fiorucci. http://www.collectcolette.com/12-185-Street_/_windows_-_70%27s_to_83.html Coincidentally a videotape of this Colette performance is currently featured in the exhibition “Come Closer; Art Around the Bowery, 1969-1989 at the New Museum up through January. Gaga is shameless. Its about time Colette gets the credit she deserves.

    1. Thank you for point that out, Marc. I do think, though, that since Polataiko’s project has been in the news so much lately, the connection is still valid. It’s sort of amusing and depressing that everyone seems to agree Gaga is ripping off SOMEONE…but we’ll never definitively know who (unless she repents and writes a memoir one day).

      1. funny u use the word repent! I had a Gaga double appear on her knees ,in front of an altar,(in one of the rooms of my exhibition) in a tableau:”PLEASE FORGIVE ME MOTHER “.I was not aware That Gaga’s was at it again! now sleeping at the Gugenheim!. The show “Lumiere Travels through Springfield” is up till Oct 15. In a historical Victorian home part of the Benedictine Catholic college .Springfield Illinois)

  3. Appropriation is commonplace in the commercial world of Lady Gaga’s team, so it’s hardly the issue here. Except that now she can truthfully claim she showed at the Guggenheim!

  4. As noted below and above there have been many sleeping art pieces (of note Tilda Swinton and Cornelia Parker piece in 1995). I don’t mind that the pop star uses the work, I do mind that professional artists don’t give the credit to the history of their piece in the context of a “ripping off” story.

  5. Blatant appropriation is common place in the commercial world of Gaga and her team, so that’s hardly the issue here. Except that now Gaga can rightfully claim that she showed at the Guggenheim Museum!

  6. I feel that many of you have missed the entire point of Gaga’s piece. The fact that it was a commercial at the same time as being an art piece was exactly the point. She arrived to the museum in a very ostentatious and pretentious fashion (riding atop a vintage convertible wearing a luxurious outfit with golden crown on her head). The guest list included celebs such as Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan…the idea is quite hilarious. A bunch of celebs crammed into a museum watching another celeb sleep. Gaga took the concept of Andy Warhol’s ‘Sleep’ film but extended it further. Next to her bed was a digital clock which was frozen at 15mins (referring to one’s 15mins of fame’). Think about it very carefully… This was a huge statement on the nature of fame and Western pop culture. I love how she brought it all to life.

  7. Just to add: the entire perfume launch was a performance piece. After Gaga slept for 2 hrs she woke up, urinated in a bucket, sprayed the perfume on, and was then tattooed on the back of her head by a celeb tattoo artist. Gaga left the launch covered head-to-toe in a flowery nightgown. Everything Gaga did has to be viewed as WHOLE. The arrival, the live broadcast, the sleep, the clock, the guest list, the tattoo and the departure. Too many people here take Gaga’s sleep element out if its context and compare it to other artists who have used the live sleeping element too. This is shallow- Gaga’s sleep had an entirely different meaning! Some people here would benefit from a revision in pop-art!

Comments are closed.