Seemingly unsatisfied with being among the most recognizable brands on the planet, earlier this year tech giant Apple filed a notice of opposition against a recipe and meal-planning app, Prepear, that had the temerity to set as their logo as a “minimalistic fruit design with a right-angled leaf” — gasp! According to the complaint, Prepear’s logo “readily calls to mind Apple’s famous Apple Logo and creates a similar commercial impression.”
According to the suit, the use of these signature motifs in the logo, plus the overlap of Prepear’s work in the online space, leads to the likelihood that consumers might confuse it for an Apple product, despite it being, you know, a green outlined pear instead of a solid apple. Prepear is pushing back with an online “Save the Pear” petition that has surpassed 180,000 signatures, rallying to “end Apple’s aggressive opposition of businesses with fruit logos.”
Apple has a history of using its resources to push even marginally similar IP out of the field. According to reporting by the Verge, in 2019, the tech company sent an objection letter to the patent office in Norway, alleging that the full-color, cartoonish logo of political party Fremskrittspartiet too closely resembled its own; Apple also objected to the logo of a cycling path in Germany.
Apple is seeking to have Prepear’s trademark registration application denied, embroiling the small company in what is sure to be a costly legal battle.
“This is a big blow to us at Prepear,” wrote co-founder Natalie Monson, who owns and operates Prepear, on the Instagram of its parent company, SuperHealthyKids. She continued:
To fight this it will cost tens of thousands of dollars. The CRAZY thing is that Apple has done this to dozens of other other small business fruit logo companies, and many have chosen to abandon their logo, or close doors. While the rest of the world is going out of their way to help small businesses during this pandemic, Apple has chosen to go after our small business.
Monson, and her husband and co-founder Russell, have a small staff, and say they are are already feeling the impact of this lawsuit.
“We are a very small business with only 5 team members, and legal costs from our fight for the right of all small business owners to be able to develop their own logo without fear of frivolous litigation has already cost us many thousands of dollars and the very saddening layoff of one of our team members,” wrote Russell Monson, in the online petition.
In a world brimming with inequality, a battle over a fruit logo is hardly the greatest injustice, but it is inarguably a shameful route for a trillion-dolllar behemoth to push around a small family-owned business over the most marginal of IP claims. Then again, Steve Jobs was famously a huge jerk. It seems, perhaps, the Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Curator La Tanya S. Autry shares a set of crucial questions she considers when curating images of anti-Black violence.
Crys Yin’s subject is grief, which, for all that takes place in public, is largely a private matter.
The first lecture is on the relationship between early portrait photography and diverse notions of US identity during the Gilded Age. Register to attend on January 25.
With her clay relief sculptures, Brie Ruais probes the exit wound and its deep psychological implications.
In Doomscrolling, Rob Swainston and Zorawar Sidhu assume the task Walter Benjamin set for the articulation of history — to “seize hold of the past as it flashes up at a moment of danger.”
Part of the university’s Artists on the Future series pairing renowned artists with cultural thought leaders, this online event is free and open to the public.
When we honor King publicly, as many in the art circle did on Monday, we use these moments to do more than just remember and pay tribute.
A study that reexamined Homo sapiens fossils found our species is 30,000 years older than previously believed.
As much as I appreciate the collective’s culture jamming initiatives, I don’t know that their putative premise ever bears meaningful fruit.
The banana’s dominance and ubiquity has had serious and far-reaching implications for the region, engendering exploitative labor systems, climate change, and migration.
Charles Dellheim’s study tells the tale of a small group of Jewish art dealers and collectors who played a key role in the changing art world of the 19th and 20th centuries.