My heart sank when I read this about potential US Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan:
At some point probably in the late 1980s, Kagan had an encounter with a young associate at a mergers and acquisitions firm. According to [Carol] Steiker [who was interviewed about Kagan in the New York Times]:
“He was single and he had no family and he was earning — the sum seemed unimaginable — $750,000 a year as a young partner. So she asked the guy, ’What do you do with all that money?’ And he said, ‘I buy art.’ I remember her telling that story and just shaking her head.”
It is fine, laudable even, not to be motivated by money. But why so dismissive of the desire to purchase art? Does art leave Kagan cold?
The Supremes — as I like to call them — aren’t known for their love of visual art but there may be an exception, Justice Stephen Breyer, who floored a curator at a dinner party some years ago when he brought up Poussin. I should mention that Kagan isn’t a total culture-hater as she does love opera — which is also admired by justices Anthony Scalia, Ruth Ginsburg, and Anthony Kennedy.
The blog post over at ARTicles by MJ Andersen also has this great line as to why Kagan should give visual art another look:
A discerning eye does more than keep a judge well-rounded. It keeps her responsive to what she beholds, and to all that resists interpretation.
I should also mention that critic Christopher Knight, of the LA Times, has a question he’s dying to ask Kagan: Do you support reopening the front doors of the United States Supreme Court to the people?
Earlier this month, the court ruled 7-2 to restrict access to the entrance which was crowned with the inspirational words, “Equal Justice Under Law.” the reason? Like everything else nowadays, the catch-all reason of security. Justices Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued a separate statement that called the change unfortunate and unjustified. My question is: How can you uphold the ideas of democracy if you chisel away at the all important symbols, which inspire us to strive for the impossible?
“Our bodies are not that cheap,” said one Iraqi artist who signed an open letter to the biennale’s curators.
Museums will have to install “prominently placed” placards alongside the works, according to a new suite of laws signed by Governor Kathy Hochul.
Choose from over 140 courses for adults and youth ages 13 to 17, including options for beginning, intermediate, and advanced students. Enroll by August 23 for an early bird discount.
Scientists borrowed the ecological “unseen species” model to estimate how many works of medieval European literature have gone extinct.
As bodily autonomy and workers’ rights remain under constant and often intertwined threat, The Work of Love, the Queer of Labor reminds us of what is still at stake.
The Brooklyn organization is now accepting new project inquiries for its fee-based fabrication services in printmaking, ceramics, and large-scale public art.
The emphasis in Semmel’s retrospective Skin in the Game is on the various points of view she has taken on herself — and, briefly, on others too.
The artist and former SWAIA chief operating officer and executive director has found a stable of dedicated collectors and a close-knit community at Santa Fe Indian Market.
The Newark Museum of Art Presents Jazz Greats: Classic Photographs from the Bank of America Collection
Photographers Antony Armstrong Jones, Milt Hinton, Chuck Stewart, Barbara Morgan, and more capture a breadth of legendary and local musicians and performance artists. On view through August 21.
Each voice in This Long Thread intersects to reveal the collective chronicles, struggles, and triumphs of women of color in today’s craft landscape.
Works by the Abeyta family of artists encourage thinking beyond activism and legislation as a means for political progress.
Despite faithfully recreating the story of the beloved comic book series, the TV show lacks the verve of the original.