Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.
CHICAGO — In the age of social-networked identities, when every private thought is often public declaration, what does it mean to be “good” or “bad”? Our words become performances, our self-portraits become selfies, and we are present as online brands. It becomes hard to take emotional moments seriously.
In the exhibition Be Good for Goodness Sake, now on view at Muriel Guépin Gallery in New York, artists Kathy Halper, Nathan Vincent, and Iviva Olenik consider the implications of such an existence, manifesting virtual moments in tactile ways — with yarn, linen, fabric, embroidery. Using images and phrases found both online and in the American cultural vernacular, the artists stitch these immaterial internet offerings.
Viewing works of art about social media through a screen rather than inside a gallery proper presents a different challenge. Here I am, flipping through the pieces on the gallery website and opening them on my computer. I start to imagine the online original source material before it was co-opted and interpreted by these artists. I am having a once-removed experience of IRL artwork that comes from URLs.
This same fluidity comes through in Iviva Olenick’s “IRL/URL” (2013), an embroidery of a young-girl taking a selfie. The text “to improve my ‘in real life’” is stitched into her arm like a tattoo, suggesting a sweetly laced adolescent moment of communication between the girl and her viewer. In its embroidered format, her selfie becomes a painting for the digital age — or rather, a painting of the digital age using a crafted means to an end.
Kathy Halper’s embroideries “Smart Decisions,” “Note to Self,” and “Look No Pants” (2011–2013) portray teenagers either engaged in or about to encounter high-risk situations. Grabbing photographs that she finds online — either on social media sites or elsewhere on the internet — Halper pairs them with Facebook status updates and that ubiquitous thumbs up. She mutes the palette through the use of a light-brown cloth that looks like it could have been ripped from a burlap bag or cut from a painting canvas. Presenting these anonymous teenagers in their natural internet environments, Halper offers a look into a world normally closed off from adults, especially from parents.
Rather than focusing on images found online, Nathan Vincent’s installation takes questions of internet surveillance to the next level. In “Be Good for Goodness Sake” (2012), which he made in collaboration with Alex Emmart, the artist forces the viewer to consider how they behave when they know they’re being watched.
In this constructed environment, a bench sits on top of astroturf; viewers may sit or lie down and look at the circular embroidery with the text “Be Good for Goodness Sake.” It hangs on the wall like an oversized version of a portrait for a child’s perfectly designed bedroom or a cute potholder found in a suburban home. An annoying reminder from mother dearest, it asks the viewer to grapple with the knowledge that they’re being watched. Viewers may do anything they want, keeping in mind that parents or family members could, at some point, come across this footage. What do you do when no one’s watching? Hopefully something you’ll be proud of the next day, and not just what makes you feel good in the moment.
Be Good for Goodness Sake is on view at Muriel Guépin Gallery (83 Orchard Street, Lower East Side, Manhattan) through January 19.
The 40-year relationship that unfolded between Toklas and Stein became the bedrock of Paris’s artistic avant-garde.
Fifty works, all created by women, are brought together across time and media as the Norton Museum of Art reckons with the art world’s patriarchal past and present.
Over the course of three months, the resident artists in Going to the Meadow will collaborate and create with a curated set of continually changing materials.
In the Blactiquing Space, curator and collector Kevin Jones presents deeply fraught objects with emotion, connection, and care.
Dobkin caught the attention of critics early on with her quirky and occasionally self-deprecating works, which often center lesbian identity.