News

Occupied Cooper and University President’s Bizarre Seclusion [UPDATE]

by Mostafa Heddaya on May 10, 2013

photo 2

Projection on the side of the Foundation Building, Thursday evening, by The Illuminator, the political art project that emerged out of Occupy Wall Street. (all photos by the author for Hyperallergic)

If getting fired is unpleasant, what of that special hell where hundreds of your staff and colleagues publicly call for your resignation? Just ask Cooper Union president Jamshed Bharucha, whose imperious refusal to communicate even the most threadbare reaction to his mounting critics has added a new, Spartan character to the meaning of “embattled.”

A poster in the Foundation Building lobby on Friday evening of Cooper Union president Jamshed Bharucha with clown accents.

A poster in the Foundation Building lobby on Friday evening of Cooper Union president Jamshed Bharucha with clown accents.

So, when roughly thirty minutes ago the Free Cooper Union Twitter account announced students were marching on Bharucha’s residence, even the most iron-hearted counterrevolutionary would have to concede that such action is at this point understandable. Indeed, Free Cooper Union’s Twitter feed, which has gained over 1,000 followers in the last 72 hours, has been an object lesson in how to execute public relations: firm, nonthreatening, nonviolent, communicative support for the underlying movement.

Even if endowment management may not be the Cooper board’s forte, one thing the Cooper administration knows how to do is manage their security. Though there were some concerns on Wednesday, with security services allegedly shoving and lightly injuring some students, the front-door-phalanx guarding the entrance to the Foundation Building has been eagle-eyed. Late last night, I tried to enter the building, but was thwarted and threatened with arrest. Today, a tenured faculty member tried to escort me in, but I was spotted and ejected as I was entering the elevator. The Village Voice had much greater success on this matter yesterday, with a professor smuggling in a journalist and a photographer, their resulting report and photo-essay is well-worth a read.

photo 3

If only such gimlet-eyed assurance shone through in other areas of Bharucha’s Cooper regime — perhaps he wouldn’t then be trapped in a room somewhere, maybe even his residence on Stuyvesant Street, where scores of his opponents are currently amassed, chanting slogans and calling for his career on a stick.

photo 4

The sort-of Blue Brothers, who are responsible for Cooper security.

UPDATE 5:58 pm EST 5/11: Jamshed Bharucha speaks. This letter was sent to campus at 3:58 pm today. The email was preceded by a Change.org petition, circulated on the campus-wide distribution list and apparently officially-backed by the school, asking occupiers to vacate Bharucha’s offices “immediately.

Date: Sat, May 11, 2013 at 3:58 PM
Subject: A message from the President of Cooper Union
To:

Dear Members of the Cooper Union Community:

The occupation of the president’s office expresses an abiding passion for Cooper and a traumatic response to the change in the scholarship policy. Full-tuition scholarships for all enrolled degree students have been central         to Cooper’s identity, and have enabled a kind of meritocracy that is rare. As we mourn this loss, the students who painted the third floor of the Foundation Building black have expressed beautifully the solemnity of this passing. The feelings that led to the occupation are understandable. I want to commend students who organized the Why Cooper initiative, which showcases the unparalleled work of our students to the world.

Seeking to avoid removing students from the occupation involuntarily, we offered the participants the opportunity to leave within a stated period, assuring them that there would be no consequences if they did so. In order to manage the process, we designated an area from which students could exit but into which entrance was restricted, sealing off certain areas as required. Some exited the occupation and others chose to remain. The plan was overwhelmed when our personnel were unable to hold back attempts to enter the restricted area. In the process, I regret that some students reported minor injuries. I also regret that two staff members reported being shoved, one falling on his back, and one staff member reported receiving a minor shoulder injury.

Much has been alleged online about the conduct of our staff and security personnel, including claims that they engaged physically with students unprovoked. Our personnel are trained and repeatedly instructed not to initiate any physical contact. There is no evidence that any of them has done otherwise.

There has been a concern on campus that some guards may be armed. Vice President Westcott periodically hires security guards for events or when crowds are expected, because Cooper has only a minimal security staff. These are NYPD-trained security personnel, who have received the best training in safety and legal procedures available in New York City. We were unaware that some carried concealed weapons, and regret the needless apprehension that was caused when a guard was asked if he was armed and responded in the affirmative. It is not uncommon for security guards in New York offices to be armed. Nevertheless, Vice President Westcott assures us that, since becoming aware of this, no guards will carry arms.

Cooper Union is a place of vibrant exchange of ideas, in which disagreement, however vehement, is conducted in a civil manner and is a catalyst for intellectual growth. I recognize that some do not approve of my administration’s decisions or style. They have every right to express that, and I shall endeavor to earn their respect. We have been faced with an almost impossible task of placing the institution on a sustainable financial platform in a highly telescoped period of time. I have had to make some tough and swift decisions; it is natural in an academic environment for some to feel that these decisions were too much too soon, or that they would have preferred a gentler process. Now that the institution is on a solvent path, let us heal ourselves. I commit myself to reaching out to all our constituents to do so.

I would much rather we could maintain our full-scholarship policy if we could. I agree that education is a right, and that our society still has not fulfilled this ideal. Cooper Union has been in the vanguard of providing access based on merit, and we are committed to that going forward. Even as I anguish over the need to change our policy, I urge you to join me in working to ensure that we thrive well into the future, preserving the outstanding quality of the students we recruit and the education our faculty provide. Cooper has so many extraordinary and unique qualities, among them: a student body that thrives on an intimate, immersive, rigorous conservatory-style education; a unique set of schools; a commitment to access for those who can least afford it; the historic Great Hall; and the most vibrant location on earth.

Sincerely,

Jamshed Bharucha

President

The Cooper Union

  • Subscribe to the Hyperallergic newsletter!

Hyperallergic welcomes comments and a lively discussion, but comments are moderated after being posted. For more details please read our comment policy.
  • peter cooper

    come on, the situation is untenable. they have to charge tuition

    • The Real Peter Cooper

      Why did it become untenable? Peter Cooper endowed CU with some of the
      most valuable real estate in the city, including the land beneath the
      Chrysler building, not with the intention of becoming “a world-class
      institution of higher learning” or a brandable commodity, but simply to
      provide a quality free education to a fairly small student body. There
      should have been nothing untenable about that. The board and recent
      presidents have been consistently negligent in carrying out their
      primary mandate. If that had been its focus throughout, they wouldn’t be
      in this mess. Instead, they stupidly were seduced by an NYU-style
      corporate model (that’s highly problematic in its own right and
      completely incompatible with the vision Peter Cooper laid out, pursued
      costly vanity projects like the new building and sold off valuable
      long-term assets to make risky investments in stocks while lamenting
      their lack of a “global brand.” The multi-millionaire assholes who saw
      themselves as visionaries and ran Cooper into the ground should cough up
      the money to set their fiscal ship straight. Or even better: Let’s not
      depend on a tiny oasis like Cooper to provide a few lucky folks with the
      education they deserve and reinvest in making higher education
      accessible to all on a federal level. Feel free to scoff, but countries
      around the world have made it a priority and are reaping the benefits.
      What’s truly untenable is having an entire generation that’s forced to
      take on burdensome life-altering debt just to gain access to an anemic
      job market.

      • peter cooper

        in answer to your fantasy: you pay.

  • http://firstproofprints.com/ John Redmann

    I can understand the plight of the students but aren’t they going after the wrong guy? He was appointed in 2011, this mess and slew of mismanaged finances began some time before his presidency.

    Perhaps to assuage the masses he should present a plan that aims to wean cooper of it’s bad assets, and return the school to status quo in a predetermined amount of time.

  • John Tomlinson

    As an alumnus of Cooper Union (Art 1970), I am as appalled as any other alumni or concerned people about what is happening at Cooper Union. I see this as the corporatization of Cooper Union by the so-called money managers, the “Masters of the Universe”, who have shown utter disrespect for the unique legacy of Peter Cooper. Because of that legacy, Cooper Union is NOT the same as other schools and universities! I do question the aiming of blame, however, at President Bharucha. What did he do to cause this crisis? He was hired to fix an untenable, long-standing and quite hidden financial disaster caused by the trustees. I do not know him, but if he remains the target, the trustees may get away without being held responsible.

Previous post:

Next post: