Reactor

Louvre Crowdfunds Major Conservation Effort

by Mostafa Heddaya on September 4, 2013

The Louvre's Nike of Samothrace, untouched by restorers since 1884, will be taken under public's wing in a new crowdfunding initiative (image via Wikimedia)

The Louvre’s Nike of Samothrace (c. 200 BCE), untouched by restorers since 1884, will be taken under public’s wing in a new crowdfunding initiative (image via Wikimedia)

The Art Newspaper is reporting that the Louvre has launched a €1 million crowdfunding campaign to pay for the conservation of its “Winged Victory of Samothrace,” a 2nd-century BCE sculpture of Nike, the Greek god of profit margins victory. It’s the fourth such campaign at the museum in recent years, following the €1.3 million raised in 2010 for the acquisition of Lucas Cranach’s “The Three Graces” (1531), a €500,000 restoration in 2011, and €800,000 raised to purchase two 13th-century statuettes.

But what happened to the mountains of cash — over $1 billion in cash and commitments — the Louvre has gained from its partnership with the Emirati government for an Abu Dhabi “branch” of the institution on the hereditary autocracy’s beleaguered Saadiyat Island project? Never mind. As public monies for museum projects contract, crowdfunding is probably better than the alternative of murky and oligarchic private patronage by individuals and corporations. Turning to the museum-going public, though hardly an alternative to a steady and independent budget, at least allows institutions to open up their finances to the public, becoming fully accountable in an era where many ostensibly not-for-profit institutions have, either voluntarily or involuntarily, been pulled into the dogged world of outsize compensation and expansionary corporate strategy, the cultural patrimony they are meant to safeguard inching toward the status of financial assets.

A recent editorial on the subject in the left-wing Libération quoted the founder of a leading French crowdfunding platform, Kiss Kiss Bank Bank (slogan: “Libérez la Créativité!”), describing his platform as “a machine that creates a shared optimism, a machine to develop self-confidence.” The reality is a bit more prosaic, though, given this brave new world of budget shortfalls at major Western institutions like the Louvre. The former president of the Ile-de-France cultural commission, Corinne Rufet, is cited in the same story as explaining that what is now needed is an enhanced partnership between public and private funding to sustain artists and the arts in the long term.

The name the Louvre has given its crowdfunding initiative is instructive here: “Tous mécènes!” The exclamation mark dignifies the necessity of cultural alms-gathering. We are all patrons!

  • Subscribe to the Hyperallergic newsletter!

Hyperallergic welcomes comments and a lively discussion, but comments are moderated after being posted. For more details please read our comment policy.
  • http://richardmccoy.tumblr.com/ Richard McCoy

    Thanks for linking to this interesting story. I wonder, too, if this will allow for contributors to have some input in how the piece should look after it is conserved, or really what they plan is.

Previous post:

Next post: