News

See 25 Artworks from Newly Discovered Nazi-era Art Stash

by Jeremy Polacek on November 12, 2013

munichcoll6

Clockwise from top left: Otto Griebel, “Child at the table”; Auguste Rodin, “Etude de femme nue debout, les bras relevés, les mains croisées au-dessus de la tête”; Bernhard Kretschmar, “Straßenbahn” (all images via lostart.de)

In an about-face, the German government announced Monday a new, accelerated policy for the 1,406 paintings discovered in a 2011 raid on Cornelius Gurlitt’s Munich apartment, promising a task force and a speedy release of information about the cache. Thus far disclosures from German authorities have been scarce, a source of much criticism from certain camps. Still many were surprised when the government published a list of titles and artists for 25 works in addition to the release of accompanying photographs on Lost Art. The internet promptly besieged the site. According the Guardian: ”No one was expecting such a storm of demand,” said a culture ministry spokesman after visitors had difficulties accessing the site. “The server was overwhelmed by the massive demand. The only thing to do is wait.”

Established by the 1998 Washington Declaration, The Lost Art website was founded to facilitate the identification and repatriation of looted WWII art. Reports vary on the total number of works from the collection believed to be confiscated, stolen or looted — again, according to the Guardian as many “970 of the works were believed to have been confiscated, stolen or looted by the Nazis.” It’s highly possibly that as many as all these 970 flagged works may eventually appear in public, released to the world through Lost Art‘s digital gates.

In the meantime, 22 further paintings were seized over the weekend from an apartment in Stuttgart, its occupant believed to be a relative of Mr. Gurlitt.

We’ve assembled here the images of the 25 artworks released so far, some lightly cropped and edited for clarity — the vintage webcam and X Games camera angling the German government seems to be employing to document the recovered works leaves much to be desired.

munichcoll2.5

Clockwise from top left: Otto Dix, “Dompteuse”; Ludwig Godenschweg “Female Nude”; Christoph Full “Mined Hantsch”; Erich Fraas “Mother and Child”

munichcollage1

Clockwise from top left: Eugène Delacroix, “Conversation mauresque sur une terrace”; Marc Chagall, “Allegorical Scene”; Hans Christoph, “Dating”; Otto Dix, “Lady in the box”; Conrad Felix Müller, “Couple in countryside”; Antonio Canaletto “Sa Giustina in Pra della Vale in Padua”

munichcoll3

Clockwise from top left: Bonaventure Genelli, “Male Nude”; Ludwig Godenschweg, “Portrait of a Man”; Théodore Rousseau, “Vue de la vallée de la Seine”

munichcoll4

Clockwise from top left: Otto Griebel, “The Veiled”; Henri Matisse, “Seated Woman / woman sitting in an armchair”; Fritz Maskos, “Reasonable woman”; Christoph Voll, “Mönch”

munichcoll5

Clockwise from top left: William Lachnit, “Man and woman at the window”; Honoré Daumier, “Don Quixote and Sancho Panza”; William Lachnit, “Girl at the table”; Carl Spitzweg, “Playing the piano”; Max Liebermann, “Riders on the beach”

 

  • Subscribe to the Hyperallergic newsletter!

Hyperallergic welcomes comments and a lively discussion, but comments are moderated after being posted. For more details please read our comment policy.
  • Nathan Milas

    Is it ok to feel like these artists’ work isn’t always the best, and that sometimes the work they produced was pure shit? Or will they forever be glorified for their mere persona?

  • http://hragv.com Hrag Vartanian

    I have to say I think the quality of the art, from what I can see from the poor photography, is quite uneven.

Previous post:

Next post: