If real-life Jane Does and Joe Schmoes have been known to discover valuable paintings at flea markets, why not Marge and Homer Simpson?
That was the premise of Sunday night’s episode of The Simpsons, in which the couple buys a painting from their neighbors’ yard sale only to discover that it’s by one Johan Oldenveldt, “prolific early-20th-century naturalist,” according to Lisa, who reads aloud the results of the fictional Oldenveldt’s Artipedia entry on her iPad. The whole family takes the work to an appraiser, who, naturally, boasts a distinguished yet indistinguishable accent and works at an auction house called Gavelby’s — tag line, “Buy art the impulsive, scary way.” He estimates the painting’s worth at $80–100,000, but before the auction can go through, someone else claims ownership. This leads Homer and Lisa on an authentication quest — “This is so exciting! My first time establishing provenance!” Lisa exclaims on the way —and from thence to the studio of a master art forger named Claus Sigler, who concludes the episode with this lesson: “Beauty is beauty. My forgeries give pleasure to people all over the world. The only real question to ask about art, whether it’s in the Louvre or on a freshman’s wall at Cal State Fullerton, is: did it move you?”
… Which is quickly followed by Homer asking, “What if I never liked the painting and only wanted it for money?” Sigler responds, and in doing so adds another lesson: “Then you I respect.”
The episode isn’t actually that LOL funny, but there are some great lines, including Marge’s comment, regarding a boat painting that used to hang above the couch, that “It felt comforting to know that while we watched TV, there was art going on behind us.” I also quite enjoyed Homer’s listing of the three things that make art valuable: “1. Nudity. 2. Holograms. 3. Something terrible happening to Jesus.” Has he been visiting the Springfield Art Fair?!
And more generally, it’s always amusing to see mainstream spoofs of the art world. This episode, titled “The War of Art” (also, coincidentally, the name of a self-help book), riffs on a host of recent art news stories, including various discoveries made on Antiques Roadshow; the 60 Minutes episode from last month on “the most successful art forger of our time,” Wolfgang Beltracchi, who’s clearly the model for Sigler; and, as David Ng points out at the LA Times, an ownership dispute over a small Renoir landscape. That work, stolen from the Baltimore Museum of Art in 1951, turned up after a woman named Marcia “Martha” Fuqua claimed to have bought it for $7 at a flea market.
As much as I appreciate the collective’s culture jamming initiatives, I don’t know that their putative premise ever bears meaningful fruit.
The banana’s dominance and ubiquity has had serious and far-reaching implications for the region, engendering exploitative labor systems, climate change, and migration.
The first lecture is on the relationship between early portrait photography and diverse notions of US identity during the Gilded Age. Register to attend on January 25.
Charles Dellheim’s study tells the tale of a small group of Jewish art dealers and collectors who played a key role in the changing art world of the 19th and 20th centuries.
The 18-month fellowship aims to provide artists with “as much access as possible” to the club’s facilities and networks “at a time and place convenient to artists.”
Part of the university’s Artists on the Future series pairing renowned artists with cultural thought leaders, this online event is free and open to the public.
A coalition of investors raised funds to purchase the film’s storyboard and announced they would “make the book public.”
A new project, “Emoji to Scale,” orders every mini-object by their real-world dimensions.
Although Khedoori does not depict living beings, their presence is evoked in the traces they leave behind.
The Bronx Museum’s fifth biennial continues to focus its programming on individual identity, eliding the ever-divergent interests of the art market and local communities.
While it may be strange to think of food insecurity as a basis for art, the works in Food Justice reveal barriers and injustices in food access.