Christian Marclay’s “The Clock” (2010) (image via

Geoff Edgers reports that the Boston MFA is buying Christian Marclay’s epic movie mash-up “The Clock” (2010) (recently on view in NYC) for $250,000, in a joint purchase with the National Gallery of Canada. The Los Angeles County Museum of Art bought the piece in April, and there are rumors that MoMA plans to do the same. What’s up with this collecting fad?

“The Clock” made a huge splash in New York when it was on view at Paula Cooper Gallery in February of this year, with curious gallery-goers literally lining up around the block to get a peek. The 24-hour video, made up of a compilation of clips from iconic movies that reference the time of day, one clip for every few minutes, attracted audiences like very little contemporary art can, managing to hit a sweet spot between conceptual achievement and mainstream accessibility.

Still from “The Clock” (image via

Marclay’s video was almost accepted as iconic on arrival, the buzz for the piece so strong (it took Marclay and a team of assistants two years to make! it had crowds lining up at its first showing at White Cube in London! it’s a triumph of appropriation!) that it became impossible to ignore. Yet despite some tepid critical evaluations, the backlash never really hit, save for a disgruntled street artist or two. “The Clock” became an instant classic, a fact only further proved by the sudden rash of museum purchases (though it’s important to note that the piece was largely created with museum collectors in mind).

Why did this happen? Well, I suspect it’s because the work hit the zeitgeist squarely on the head, bringing together a YouTube-friendly format that viewers could watch for as long or short as they liked according to their attention span with a populist bed of influences that audiences could easily identify with — Marclay’s a movie buff, just like you are! Can you spot your favorite film? The combination is irresistible in the short term for its punchiness, a headline-making snappy quality that would make any work of art go viral.

Christian Marclay’s “The Clock” (image via

But in the long term, “The Clock” also has a monumentality that’s attractive to institutions with the resources to nurture a work over decades of display. There are levels of sensitivity and complexity within the work that will take years to discover, over hundreds of repeated viewings, the process of living with the art and allowing it to develop. One Hyperallergic friend mentioned that they noticed all the scenes before the top of the hour are about anticipation, while all the scenes after the top of the hour are often about regret. These subtleties will take years of display to come to the surface.

“The Clock” entangles real and fictional time, narrative and space, creating its own reality minute by minute. It’s a monument for the era of the YouTube mash-up, a work that takes the aesthetics and possibilities of our digital world and elevates them to a higher level of experience, critical creation and critical thought. So all these museum purchases might be a fad, a hangover of the piece’s insta-popularity, rest assured, we’ll be seeing a lot of “The Clock” in the next decade of contemporary art exhibitions.

Kyle Chayka was senior editor at Hyperallergic. He is a cultural critic based in Brooklyn and has contributed to publications including ARTINFO, ARTnews, Modern Painters, LA Weekly, Kill Screen, Creators...

13 replies on “Why Are So Many Museums Buying Christian Marclay’s “The Clock”?”

    1. I assume the gallery helped to fund its production… they clearly knew it was going to be a big deal, or must have known after a while.

  1. Kyle, you sum it up very nicely, “managing to hit a sweet spot between conceptual achievement and mainstream accessibility.” That’s a sweet sweet spot.

  2. Entrant the Art World’s Rocky Horror… Once-a-month screenings at museums that own a copy. 🙂

    1. Yeah, everyone can sit there for 24 hours straight and throw watches at the screen whenever a watch comes up. I guess you’d need a lot of watches.

  3. I personally find it fairly vacuous and tedious. People say it’s an ‘amazing achievement’ yeah, with a big team of researchers you can make a ‘achieve’ a lot.

  4. Four institutions purchasing this work (two of them in a joint purchase) counts as a “collecting fad”? Works of this kind are always made as editioned pieces, and given the importance and popularity of the work, I’m surprised that it’s not sold out already. It’s utterly commonplace for a number of institutions to purchase editions of the same work by a high profile artist like Marclay. Articles such as this one often leave me with the impression that Hyperallergic lacks a certain savviness and rigor.

  5. I like the Telephone 7 minute short film. It was at an exhibit here in Denver at the DAM.

    It was the first time I had heard of this artist.

Comments are closed.