The most commanding visual in Manfred Mohr: 1964- 2011, Réflexions sur une esthétique programmée at Bitforms gallery in New York isn’t one of the German digital art pioneer’s own pieces. Rather, it’s the scroll-size wall panel from Mohr’s solo show at the Musée d’Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris in 1971.
Visitors were asked to respond to the question:
Que pensez-vous de la recherche esthétique faite à l’aide d’un ordinateur? (“What do you think of aesthetic research done with the aid of a computer?”)
The mess of scrawled responses, looking like a manic Cy Twombly, ranges from thoughtful comments like “Il y a forcement un homme derrière une machine” (“There is necessarily a man behind a machine”) to written cries of “FROID” (COLD) or a contrarian “CHAUD” (hot).
That’s not to say that the rest of the work is dull, just that it lacks that visceral punch of the wall panel. But in a simple way, that’s the point. Manfred Mohr is known for being one of the first artists to use the computer to guide and transmit art, and his 1971 solo show at the Musée d’Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris was the first museum exhibit to be entirely composed of works calculated and created by a digital computer. The wall panel is a human shout in a gallery full of machine-guided art, where cubes steadily form and close and calculation replaces impulse.
While the exhibit centers and reflects on that 1971 solo show, it is a comprehensive retrospective, if on first glance a difficult one to arrange chronologically. Plotter ink drawings from 1976 descend from one corner, while laser-cut steel glyphs from 1993 frolic over another wall. Most of the work is surprisingly animated, apart from some rather stark pieces that center on the late 1960s. There are also a couple of LCD screen pieces from 2010 that seem too sterile and somber, but they weren’t on when I went by the gallery, so they might have some life in person. Yet in the majority of the work, the vigorous movement of the plotter or Mohr’s own hand guided by the computer is evident. Just as that observant viewer wrote on the wall panel, there is a man present behind the machine.
Once oriented to the show with a chronological compass, the progress of repetition and digital experimentation is more clear. At the 1971 solo show, Mohr demonstrated his plotter art, which drew lines and diagrams with mechanical arms. Starting as an abstract expressionist and also spending time as a jazz musician, Mohr’s plotter drawings have an improvised feel even in their strict geometry. I could imagine them as sheet music for robots.
There is a mechanical echo of the wall panel in “Schrift-Bild,” an earlier piece from 1964 when Mohr was just discovering the writings of Max Bense, a German philosopher who wrote on information aesthetics and greatly influenced Mohr’s algorithmic curiosity. Mohr went on to write in the FORTRAN programming language used for the plotter drawings, where the work became stricter and cubes and hypercubes emerged from the lines. More recent art is dominated by layered shapes, stepping backwards in time they burst apart, seismographs of angles left in their place.
Digital art is hardly rare now, and a wall panel erected in the digital interaction-minded Talk to Me exhibit currently at the MoMA would likely elicit similar responses as back in 1971. The work in the show at bitforms seems to pull close and then away from the coldness of the machine, brushing against the supposed artistic frigidness of guidelines and algorithms. Yet Mohr always has been able to keep visible that man behind the machine, a pulse in the processing.
Manfred Mohr: 1964- 2011, Réflexions sur une esthétique programmée will be on view at Bitforms gallery (529 West 20th Street, 2nd Floor, Chelsea, Manhattan) until October 15, 2011.
With Moonage Daydream, director Brett Morgen sought to let Bowie’s music and philosophy hit in a whole new way, immersing audiences in an IMAX experience.
The union says 60% of employees at the Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh make less than $15 an hour.
Funding options at UB include full-tuition scholarships for MFA students, the Arthur A. Schomburg Fellowship Program, and additional opportunities for MA students.
The floor mosaic is part of a 50-dwelling Roman villa built in the second century on a cliff in Kent that is in danger of falling into the sea.
Members of the far-right extremist group the Proud Boys joined a group of religious parents gathered outside Memphis’s Museum of Science & History.
This exhibition presents new commissions by Bay Area artists Sadie Barnette, Angela Hennessy, Clare Rojas, and Zio Ziegler alongside work from the McEvoy Family Collection.
The law will apply only in “rare cases,” one expert says, but nevertheless signals a shift from past legal restrictions.
Whatever else Mire Lee’s Carriers is about, it seems to me that has to do with sending you back into yourself, which is not necessarily a soothing place.
Open to scholars, artists, curators, and writers, this new fellowship embraces the interdisciplinary spirit of a pioneering fiber artist and comes with a $30,000 stipend.
It’s been 55 years since Warhol hired a lookalike to prank students at the University of Utah. What lessons on celebrity and capitalist consumption did his hoax reveal?
Julia Guez knows that her poetry can make a “real ask” of readers, with its peculiar vocabulary and indeterminate tendencies, and that gives her hope.
From ancient times to the present day, join us as we pay tribute to these otter-ly charismatic creatures in various visual media.