Playing Soviet: The Visual Languages of Early Soviet Children’s Books, 1917-1953 is an online interactive from Princeton University exploring the vibrant art and propaganda narratives of Soviet children’s books. Stretching from the 1917 Russian Revolution to the death of Stalin in 1953, the books celebrate the rise of industry, the Red Army, and the progress of the Soviet Union in spreading its ideology. One book, The Little Octobrist Rascal (1925), even features a young boy handing out copies of the Pioneer to ward off pre-Soviet folkloric characters like Baba Yaga and Ivan Tsarevich.
Shaunacy Ferro recently shared the site on Mental Floss, noting that “[m]any of the books were designed to indoctrinate children into the world of the ‘right’ way to think about Soviet culture and history.” On the Playing Soviet site, Princeton states:
As was clear both from the rhetoric of the arbiters of Soviet culture – its writers and government officials – the illustration and look of Soviet children’s books was of tantamount importance as a vehicle for practical and concrete information in the new Soviet regime. Directives for a new kind of children’s literature were founded on the assumption that the “language of images” was immediately comprehensible to the mass reader, far more so than the typed word.
Princeton notes that it is still a work in progress, with future relationship mapping and data visualizations being planned, and more images to be added. The interactive database, co-directed by Thomas Keenan and Katherine Hill Reischl, follows last year’s launch of a digital library for the Soviet-era books in the Cotsen Children’s Library. The books were gifted by Lloyd E. Cotsen between 1994 and 2006. Under the direction of curator Andrea Immel, the collection has continued to grow, with 2,500 Soviet children’s books now in the library.
Not all of these are featured in Playing Soviet. The included volumes feature annotations by scholars and students on their themes, background on the artists, and context for the stories. While the books themselves are not translated, you can flip through digitized versions, searchable by title, artist, or illustration, further sorted by publisher, subjects, techniques, year, and colors. Photomontage, letterpress, and creative typography appear in the art, such as modernist Aleksandr Deĭneka’s dynamic color lithographs for the 1931 The Electrician, and avant-garde artist Kirill Zdanevich’s illustrations of anthropomorphic animals for poet Vladimir Mayakovsky’s 1928 Whatever Page You Look At, There’s an Elephant or a Lioness. The Chichagova Sisters — Galina and Olga — aimed to supplant old fairy tales with new stories on socialism and science. Their 1924 Where do dishes come from?, illustrated in a Constructivist style, follows the manufacture of crockery. Uzbek artist Aleksandr Nikolaev created the wordless 1930 The Second May Day, contrasting scenes of children joining joyous public demonstrations in the Soviet Union, while on the opposite page a German boy’s participation is curtailed by the police.
Although the Soviet teachings could be heavy, there was a freedom for artistic experimentation that wasn’t available in “adult” literature. In an introduction to the 2013 book Inside the Rainbow: Russian Children’s Literature 1920-35: Beautiful Books, Terrible Times, author Philip Pullman wondered: “What were they doing, these commissars and party secretaries, to allow this wonderland of modern art to grow under their very noses?” He concluded that, much like in the rest of the world, children’s books could “be ignored. They’re not serious.” Yet children’s literature, in its embrace of colorful imagery and populist themes, can be an incredible window into a time and place where openings for free expression were closing.
Playing Soviet: The Visual Languages of Early Soviet Children’s Books, 1917-1953 is available to explore online through Princeton University.
Artist Minouk Lim wants to offer a very different perspective on how one might deal with a grim history whose effects continue to be felt in the present.
This week: Should Washington have a national memorial for gun violence? Have cats used us to take over the world? What is Cluttercore? And more.
Organizers, artists, and land practitioners are holding public events at Iglesias Garden in a hub space supported by the Climate Justice Initiative, a project of Mural Arts Philadelphia.
The artist’s style blends aesthetic and cultural elements from Ghana, London, and New York’s graffiti scenes.
Workers told Hyperallergic that they were tired of meager pay and a lack of job security.
Jo Sandman / TRACES opens with a reception for the artist on June 3 at Black Mountain College Museum + Arts Center in Asheville, North Carolina.
Authorities say Jean-Luc Martinez helped facilitate the Louvre’s purchase of objects illegally pillaged during the Arab Spring.
The suspects attempted to take a Basquiat artwork valued at $45,000 from Taglialatella Galleries but instead made off with a half-empty bottle of whiskey.
Funding MFAs and all full-time graduate degrees, the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowships for New Americans supports immigrants and the children of immigrants in the US.
From music and architecture to comedy and horror, these films showcase Ukrainian culture and its long-held ethos of resistance.
The artists showcased in Archival Intimacies examine the colonial trauma’s impact on Asian Americans and search for ways to overcome it.
Eiffel inadvertently paints its protagonist not as a great man worthy of scrutiny or praise, but as the Elon Musk of his day.