Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.
LONDON — Totalitarianism in the digital age need not manifest in the actions of dictators and hawkeyed fascists. Today, such bullying ideologies have permeated the invisible economic infrastructures of Silicon Valley. Companies like Google, Amazon, and Apple compete to be our only resource, our confidante. Through the internet, such companies subtly choreograph our knowledge and how we discover that knowledge. Unspooling the tangled, hegemonic influence of the World Wide Web is difficult, requiring a grasp on the physical and ethereal architectures of the internet. But what if we just scrapped the entire thing? What if we started the internet anew and erased Silicon Valley? What if we renewed the internet’s commitment to neutrality, individuality, and freedom?
Artist and writer Zach Blas wants a new internet, now. His solo exhibition at South London’s Gasworks Gallery, Contra-Internet, begins by attacking the internet as a function of totalizing capitalism and ends with the utopian possibilities that the internet once held in the 1980s and ’90s. Although theoretically dense, Blas’s exhibition balances serious insights with some much-needed comedic irony.
In a cleverly plagiarized manifesto titled The End of the Internet (As We Knew It), Blas lifts text from queer and radical economic theorists like Beatriz Preciado, Fredric Jameson, and the Zapatista Subcomandante Marcos. A nearby video installation demonstrates how Blas composed the manifesto. It begins with him searching through publicly available online articles written by his targeted authors. When he finds a key excerpt related to his subject, he copies and pastes it into a document. Gradually, Blas works through the text, replacing all mentions of “capitalism” with “internet,” “economy” with “network,” and so on. He repurposes texts that initially argued against economic and sexual hegemonies for his battle against the internet.
Through his sly sleight of hand, Blas exposes how the internet virtually annihilates the distance between things. His mixing and melding of theories highlights how easily the distinctions between philosophies collapse.
Blas offers a utopian alternative to today’s corporate-run digital forum with the “contra-internet.” He hints at what this digital paradise could be in his film Jubilee 2033, the obvious crown jewel of the show. In it, the writer Ayn Rand (played by Susanne Sachße) sits in her bleak living room, fashionably smoking her long cigarette while former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan (played by Dany Naierman) and his wife, Joan Mitchell (played by Lindsay Hicks), sit in attendance. After some stultifying objectivist banter, a holographic Japanese AI robot inexplicably appears from a cruciform cloud of electrical dust, telling Rand that it will serve her bidding. It’s an extremely strange, funny moment that helps the film segue toward its fantastical second setting in the near future: a cybernetic “anti-campus” run by Nootropix, a genderqueer techno-prophet, warmly played by performance artist Cassils.
It is through Nootrpoix that Blas imagines what freedom will look like in the contra-internet. Nootropix lectures their students on how Silicon Valley (now called the Silicon Zone) collapsed alongside the entirety of the internet. Nootropix becomes a symbol of electro-queer enlightenment: an android who acts in opposition to sexual, economic, political, and philosophical hegemonies. The most evocative image from Jubilee 2033 is one of Nootropix dancing around a neon pink grid system while occasionally posing in the style of Classical Greek sculpture and mythology — think the Discobolus of Myron or Artemis holding her bow — while Andrea Bocelli sings To Say Goodbye (Con Te Partiro) in the background. Here, we see that the contra-internet will be playful and tantalizing, an archipelago of parties that emancipates us from technological domination.
Zach Blas: Contra-Internet continues at Gasworks Gallery (155 Vauxhall St, London) through December 10.
Correction: A previous version of this article stated Alan Greenspan was married to the artist Joan Mitchell. This is incorrect; he was married to a different woman of the same name. This has been fixed.
“Black infants in America are now more than twice as likely to die as white infants—11.3 per 1,000 black babies, compared with 4.9 per 1,000 white babies, according to the most recent government data—a racial disparity that is actually wider than in 1850, 15 years before the end of slavery, when most black women were…
he ownership of images has a long and nuanced legal history, which has evolved dramatically in recent years as cultural standards and photographic technologies have rapidly advanced
The show, which honors the 50th anniversary of an exhibition history once ignored, continues a series of projects documenting Wilmington’s contemporary art scene.
Renty and his daughter Delia. Renty was an enslaved African, kidnapped from the Congo, sold and forced into slave labor on the South Carolina plantation of B.F. Taylor
What is the relation between possessing a person, possessing their image, and dispossessing their progeny
As a scholar of African American history and photography whose work has focused on the status of violent images in museums and archives, I fully support the validity of Ms. Tamara Lanier’s claim and the amicus brief.
Two K-12 art teachers will each receive a $1,000 cash gift and an additional $500 to put toward classroom art supplies. Nominations are due October 31.
The daguerreotypes of Renty Taylor, Delia, Drana, Alfred, Jack, George Fassena, and Jem remained in an unused storage cabinet until 1975, when it was discovered by an employee of the Peabody Museum.
I am writing in support of the amicus curiae brief submitted by Professor Ariella Aïsha Azoulay of Brown University for the full restitution of the daguerreotypes of Renty Taylor and his daughter Delia, currently held by Harvard University, to their familial descendant, Tamara Lanier.
We cannot be indifferent to the long-lasting effects of photography. The photographs at the center of Lanier v. Harvard are relentless in making Renty and Delia Taylor work and perform as slaves. The pain inflicted on them has not ceased. Photography has the capacity to propagate harm, and we have the moral obligation to interrupt…