Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.
Students and faculty at the University of Texas in Austin are concerned that their Fine Arts Library (FAL) will soon be downsized out of existence. Already some 60% of the FAL’s collection materials have been moved to off-campus storage facilities, or about 75,000 fine art books, music scores, and other items, according to the Daily Texan. Over the summer, FAL collection items were cleared from the E. William Doty Building‘s fourth floor, which was then converted to classrooms, study spaces, and workshops for the School of Design and Creative Technologies (SDAT). Now, the fate of another 200,000 items is in limbo, as the UT Austin administration seeks to vacate more space in the Doty Building to make room for the SDAT, according to the Dallas Morning News.
“This fall you informed the faculty in my department that the Fine Arts Library in the Doty Fine Arts Building will close,” Jeffrey Chipps Smith, an art history professor at UT Austin, wrote in a letter addressed to Douglas Dempster, the dean of the College of Fine Arts, in October (and shared with Hyperallergic). “The only questions are when this might happen in the next few years and where the remaining materials might be moved. This news adversely affects the entire university community. In my 38 years of teaching at the University of Texas, I cannot recall faculty and staff morale across the College of Fine Arts being as low as it is now.”
Following outcry over the decision to relocate the remaining and prized collection materials from the fifth floor of the Doty Building, dean Dempster organized a town hall last month where nearly 100 students voiced their opposition to the plan. In response, the dean formed a task force made up of faculty, libraries staff, and students to formulate “a range of scenarios for providing access” to the FAL collection. A spokesperson for the dean told Hyperallergic that the task force has been asked to report back by early April 2018, adding: “There is currently no timeline for decision-making or implementation beyond that.”
However, many students and faculty are upset at the changes already made and opposed to any further relocations of FAL materials from the Doty Building. On December 15, they delivered a letter to dean Dempster and other UT Austin administrators signed by nearly 400 alumni, current students, and supporters.
“Paradoxical though it may seem, a key component of digital literacy is recognizing the value of analog resources. This cannot be taught if there are none available,” the letter reads in part. “Without a fully functional, on-site Fine Arts Library, UT-Austin’s College of Fine Art is certain to not only lose high quality faculty and students to this program but also have its primacy in the state compromised.”
According to dean Dempster, the number of materials checked out from the FAL has fallen from 216,000 to less than 100,000 in recent years. FAL collection materials that have already been moved off-site can be retrieved within three business days and, he suggested in a statement, many more off-site items can be made easily accessible through digitization. “Browsing through stacks can be a place of research discovery, as can digital access to millions of remote items,” he wrote. The December 15 letter took issue with this claim in particular.
“Artists, even ‘digital artists,’ carefully consider the materials they use when constructing their works of art,” the letter states. “Digitizing the Fine Arts Library collection will have a deadening and flattening effect on so much rich material. For artists who believe art books to be autonomous works of art in their own right, this move is especially troubling.”
While the fate of the FAL’s collection remains unknown, and will no doubt be shaped at least in part by the findings of the task force, members of the School of Fine Arts community are adamant that its relocation and digitization would be a major blow to the school.
“I teach a huge (400 students) partially online class and I use a great deal of technology in my classrooms, and students love this,” Ann C. Johns, an art history professor at UT Austin who also earned her Ph.D. there, told Hyperallergic. “But we also need our library! My own emphasis is on undergraduate education, and in nearly all of our undergrad courses, the library and the research that takes place there is an integral part of our students’ education.”
Art by Athena LaTocha, Wendy Red Star, Marianne Nicolson, Anita Fields, Jaune Quick-to-See Smith & Neal Ambrose-Smith, and more is on view through January 2022.
Unless you were already familiar with Bey’s documentary work, the horror he refers to might not be recognizable to you.
The intention behind the seemingly bizarre combination was, according to Attie, “to give visual form to the shared American and Brazilian reality of nationalistic divisions that defines our political present.”
Nowhere in the museums’ advertising blitzkrieg for the performance were we told to bring our wildfire-season masks as well as our covid masks, and covid masks don’t prevent smoke inhalation.
View work by over 40 experimental artists and collectives from throughout the Americas who contributed to New York’s art scene during the 1960s and ’70s.
Several members of the 2021 cohort identify as artists and storytellers, utilizing the power that art and narrative have on changing ideas of power.
Made possible by a donation from Amazon stakeholder MacKenzie Scott, the award is the single largest in the Bedstuy-based organization’s history.
A donation of two hundred works includes Jean-Michel Basquiat, Robert Mapplethorpe, Keith Haring, and Donald Baechler.