In the 1914 short film, A Busy Day, Charlie Chaplin, dressed in drag, plays a suffragette, wreaking havoc and getting into fistfights all over town for no real reason, sans dialogue and accompanied by a ragtime score. A year after Chaplin’s film, the women of New York City would take to the streets by the tens of thousands, marching down Fifth Avenue for the right to vote. (A suffrage parade in Washington, DC had already taken place in 1913.) Although a number of US states had granted women’s suffrage by this time, New York was lagging behind, and it wasn’t until 1917 that female New Yorkers were finally invited to the polling booths. As Hotbed, an exhibition at the New-York Historical Society, argues, this victory was largely due to the local activism of the bohemians of Greenwich Village.
Hotbed begins with a map of the Village in the early 1900s, introducing the neighborhood as a breeding ground of revolutionary ideas. A Venn diagram of sorts presents the main characters in the feminist story of the neighborhood — people like nurse Margaret Sanger, anarchist Emma Goldman, and playwright Susan Glaspell, who co-founded the Provincetown Players, a theater company that sought to provide New Yorkers with a more serious alternative to the commercial ambitions of Broadway. (It was one of the first companies to put on a Eugene O’Neill play.) Along with members and friends of the Provincetown Players, the feminist group Heterodoxy and the socialist publication The Masses completed the trio of Greenwich Village’s most influential and revolutionary organizations at the time.
Divided into several rooms, Hotbed presents its historical documents and ephemera in loosely defined categories, beginning with an introduction to the major players, before weaving through questions of feminist fashion, birth control, women’s activism in the areas of labor and racial equality, timelines of marches and protests, and a whole section on pro- and anti-suffrage propaganda, from postcards and flyers (many of the biplanes that dropped pro-suffrage leaflets were themselves piloted by women) to posters and the new medium of movies, played at nickelodeons.
“If we trust women with our children, can’t we trust them with the vote?” reads a line from a leaflet hanging in a tote bag, a copy of a historical document offered to visitors for the taking. There’s also a small theater that screens excerpts from some of the films coming out of both sides of the suffrage debate, like the one of Chaplin as suffragette.
The second half of the exhibition offers a suffrage movement separating into factions during the First World War, with women divided between idealist anti-war pacifism and a more practical pro-war loyalty, a means of proving a patriotism deserving of equal rights — a strategy often used by marginalized groups, like Japanese-Americans during WWII and African-Americans in almost every war, from the Civil War to Vietnam. The racial divide also comes out in this section, as does the wartime xenophobia that results in the deportation of Emma Goldman and hundreds of other perceived enemies of the state under the auspices of the Red Scare. “In the 1920s, bohemia decamped to Paris as Prohibition drove much of New York social life underground,” reads the wall text, but the fact that the temperance and suffrage movements were themselves intertwined is largely glossed over.
The 19th amendment, guaranteeing women the right to vote, was added to the US Constitution on August 18, 1920, but as we all know, it was far from the end of the women’s movement. A century later, we’re still arguing about birth control — not to mention labor inequalities, racial justice, and war and peace. Hotbed ends with a wall-size photo of the 2017 Women’s March in Washington, DC. “Decency Matters,” reads one of the signs in the photo. Or as Greenwich Village journalist and political activist Louise Bryant said almost a hundred years ago, “I do not want to be treated like a lady, but I want to be treated as a human being.” Don’t we all.
Hotbed continues at the New-York Historical Society (170 Central Park West, Upper West Side, Manhattan) through March 25.
The action could disrupt public access to the museum as workers campaign for higher wages and better labor conditions.
Over 500 scholars signed an open letter to reinstate the exhibition, which was postponed in consideration of the ongoing war in Ukraine.
This week, artist studios in the streets of Manhattan, a Texas high school, a Brooklyn apartment, and more.
Your list of must-see, fun, insightful, and very New York art events this month, including Ed Ruscha, Nina Katchadourian, Luis Camnitzer, Martha Edelheit, and more.
Join the New-York Historical Society on February 10 for a virtual conversation about our changing relationship to the natural world with Julie Decker, John Grade, and LaMont Hamilton.
Asawa’s life masks do not keep count of past or future losses.
At San Francisco’s Legion of Honor, Mobina Nouri took scissors to her own strands and invited others to do the same.
Amid a worsening inflation crisis, Sergio Guillermo Diaz’s banknote artworks are a poignant symbol of Argentinian resilience.
Theatres of Melancholy: The Neo-Romantics in Paris and Beyond highlights a group of artists who found acclaim and patronage only to fall back into obscurity.
Presented by Northwestern’s Block Museum and McCormick School of Engineering, this new exhibition seeks empathy at the boundaries of life. On view in Evanston, Illinois.
Jean Renoir’s newly restored 1939 classic proves that lawless wealth — then as now — makes a marvelous farce of us all.
Hamburg’s Antisemitism Commissioner disparaged photographer Adam Broomberg for his support of the BDS movement.