Earlier this month, the first half of Abortion is Normal kicked off at Eva Presenhuber gallery in New York. Bringing together the work of over 50 artists to raise awareness and funding in support of accessible, safe, and legal abortion, the exhibition’s second half opened this past Tuesday at Arsenal Contemporary. Abortion is Normal was curated by Jasmine Wahi and Rebecca Pauline Jampol, and co-organized by Marilyn Minter, Gina Nanni, Laurie Simmons, and Sandy Tait in response to state laws passed restricting abortion and Roe vs. Wade being in jeopardy of being reversed. (Proceeds raised from the show will be donated in support of voter education and advocacy on reproductive rights, as well as Planned Parenthood PAC efforts in the upcoming 2020 elections via Downtown for Democracy.)
Featuring artists from a plurality of backgrounds, the exhibition speaks to the vastness of how abortion and bodily autonomy affect so many of us in different ways. “If there’s anything I want people to take away from the exhibition,” Wahi told Hyperallergic, “it’s that there are multiple voices in the conversation, and this conversation really does impact everyone; we all have something at stake.”
The show’s title and mission tap into a larger movement to embrace abortion rights and reproductive justice unapologetically. As author Jenny Brown writes in her 2019 book Without Apology, “It was massive feminist mobilizations, fueled by women publicly discussing what was once secret and stigmatized that won us the abortion rights we have.” Abortion Is Normal features artwork in this justice-minded vein, eschewing the focus on privacy, exceptions, and choice that have dominated the movement for reproductive rights over the last 45 years. Shout Your Abortion, the book and hashtag founded by Amelia Bonow, for example, aims to normalize the procedure through sharing abortion stories, and Viva Ruiz’s “Thank God For Abortion” (2019) subverts religious attacks on reproductive rights with clothing, banners, riot gear, and ornately decorated mannequins emblazoned with religious imagery and the words “Thank God for Abortion” in English and Spanish. A table at the exhibition featured glitter-encrusted t-shirts, buttons, and stickers featuring all three of these slogans for sale to benefit the cause.
Each piece in the exhibition contributes to a rich, shame-free counter-narrative to the repressive views on reproductive rights perpetuated by Republicans in power. In Cindy Sherman’s “Untitled” (2019), a pregnant woman stares the viewer dead in the eye as she clutches her stomach, a visceral reminder of how personal the experience of pregnancy is. Grandly towering over the room, Dominique Duroseau’s “Mammy was here: she equally acceptable” (2019) calls attention to racial inequities in reproduction and childcare, rooted in the history of enslavement. Composed of miniature perfume bottles filled with decanted period blood that the artist collected from menstruating people of all genders, Christen Clifford’s installation “I Want Your Blood” (2013–2019) juxtaposes the trappings of traditional feminine desirability with the often hidden (and shamed) bodily experience of menstruation. The blood used in Clifford’s work, as well as in Portia Munson’s “Menstrual Prints” (1993) series also highlights the arbitrary framing of abortion as an ending of life, since each menstrual period involves the shedding of uterine lining, which contains an egg that could have been fertilized and led to pregnancy.
Other works in the show illuminate parts of the picture that are given less attention within the mainstream abortion debate. Reinterpreting a 1930’s label from Puerto Rican produce sold in the U.S., Miguel Luciano’s painting “Barceloneta Bunnies” (2007), for example, addresses our country’s history of forced sterilization by referencing a Puerto Rico town targeted by such programs as part of the island’s population control policy. Elektra KB’s photo series “Queer Alterations for a Post-Nuclear Kin” (2020) is one of several works in the exhibition focusing on queer, trans, and gender nonconforming experiences of reproductive health.
Abortion Is Normal is very much a call to action. Wahi stresses the urgency of the show’s message in a presidential election year, and the importance of voting and having our voices heard. “Get out there and express yourself,” she says. “Even if you’re not able to vote, become active in this conversation, because whatever happens this year is going to determine what happens in the next four to eight years.”
Abortion is Normal continues through February 1 at Arsenal Contemporary (214 Bowery, Lower East Side). The exhibition was curated by Jasmine Wahi and Rebecca Pauline Jampol and co-organized by Marilyn Minter, Gina Nanni, Laurie Simmons, and Sandy Tait.
Art Problems: How Do I Get a Public Art Commission?
Want to leave a mark on your city or town, but don’t know where to start? Paddy Johnson has some tips.
Rose B. Simpson Embeds Ancestral Histories in Clay
She has taken clay and used it to recall its ancestral roots in Pueblo culture and address the present history of postcolonial recovery and ongoing trauma.
Mondays at Pratt Institute: Weekly Openings of Work by Graduating Artists
Free and open to the public, Pratt Shows celebrate the school’s graduating students. MFA and BFA work on view this spring in Brooklyn, New York.
Quiet Paintings at a Time of Sensory Overload
Where Kim Mikyung’s process suggests an obsessive burrowing into the self, Kim Hyung-dae casts his gaze upward and outward into the sky.
Is the “Free the Nipple” Movement Too White?
Online representations of the activists lean White and thin, creating an image problem for the movement.
LSU School of Art Grants Highest MFA Stipends in the Southern US
With funded assistantships, full tuition waivers, and generous stipends, Louisiana State University helps students lay the groundwork for a successful lifelong art practice.
New “We ❤️ NYC” Campaign Misses the Mark
The recently unveiled design is meant to live alongside the iconic original and specifically address the city, but New Yorkers are not happy.
1,000+ Objects at The Met Linked to Antiquities Smugglers
A report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists revealed hundreds of works once owned by people accused of or convicted of antiquities crimes.
School of the Art Institute of Chicago Offers Summer Art and Design Courses Online and On-Campus
Emerging and established artists can choose from over 50 Adult Continuing Education courses at one of the most influential art and design schools in the US.
Lunar Bead Necklace and Asteroid “Emoji” Head to Auction
Christie’s bizarre sale features other space rocks propped up on stands like sculptures.
Scientists Create the First Full Brain Map of a Fly
The achievement is a giant step toward understanding human neural networks.
IDSVA Offers a Non-Studio PhD in Visual Arts: Philosophy, Aesthetics, and Art Theory
With no campus, the Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts is a truly nomadic institution, existing everywhere our students and faculty are.
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Closes Over Climate Protest
The institution shuttered in advance of an action planned for the 33rd anniversary of its infamous art heist.
Remembering the Migrants Who Died in US Detention
Artist Jackie Amézquita will lead a caravan of trucks with the names of the deceased to LA sites representing systems of oppression and solidarity for immigrants.
Today is Holocaust Day. Yesterday an artist was murdered. Have you no sense of irony in normalizing the murder of children?
I wish that everyone would just accept the science of procreation. Life as a genetically unique individual begins at conception. As an adult human, every cell in your body is the decedent of that first cell. So, life begins at conception.
That fact has not stopped us from aborting 60 million babies since the practice. So so it acis scially accepted. The only thing keeping everyone from agreeing on it is the weird debate over when life begins or, more recently, when it is ok to terminate a life without guilt.
For example, should it be ok to kill babies before they have a heart or brain? It seems the most humane time certainly. What is the difference though as ,if not terminated, said baby would develop into an adult so why not terminate them then humanely if you want?
It is all a logical disaster and I think we should all just settle on a factual definition of life. I mean back in the day in the US the legal definition of being human excluded blacks so they could be slaves.
In Germany the Nazis defined Jews, the Romani and the disabled as sub human and ok to exterminate.
Today we have defined unborn children as less than han so that we can kill them at will and we have far surpassed the slave owners and the Nazis in numbers.lets just admit that, according to basic science, babies are living human beings and then decide at what point it is cool to kill them.
Comments are closed.