In a statement released on April 27, the Chinese Ministry of Housing and Urban Development issued strict prohibitions on public architecture that “plagiarizes, imitates, and copycats” existing designs, reported the BBC. The country’s government says that buildings “reveal a city’s culture,” and that copies should be avoided in favor of fresh designs.
According to the Architect’s Newspaper, the trend of erecting lookalike or knockoff structures in China first gained steam in the 1990s with a replica of Le Corbusier’s Ronchamp Chapel in Zhengzhou. The chapel has since been demolished, but numerous other examples of copied foreign designs remain, their appeal based on the possibility of touring global landmarks without leaving the country. The world’s second largest replica of the Eiffel Tower, for instance, can be found in Tianducheng in the city of Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, along with French neoclassical-style buildings and even its very own Arc de Triomphe. (The largest replica of the Eiffel Tower resides in the US, in Las Vegas.)
But now, the Chinese government will attempt to reverse the tradition of “copycat” architecture. The Ministry’s guidelines highlight sports stadiums, exhibition centers, museums, and other sizable, culturally-relevant buildings among the structures where original designs will be encouraged in order to “strengthen cultural confidence, show a city’s features, exhibit the contemporary spirit, and display the Chinese characteristics,” according to the statement.
It will also restrict the construction of skyscrapers, imposing a maximum height of 500 meters (~1640 feet). (For context, the One World Trade Center in New York, the tallest building in the US, is 1,776 feet high. According to ArchDaily, it is the sixth tallest structure in the world.) New skyscrapers in China should also meet fire protection, earthquake resistance, and energy saving guidelines.
According to the Architect’s Newspaper, the newly-released policies have been met with praise on social media. Some Chinese architects and urban planners have long emphasized the need for the nation’s buildings to reflect its rich architectural history.
“China has some cities, traditional cities, with a long history,” said Ma Yansong, who heads the Beijing-based architecture firm MAD, in a 2017 interview with Dezeen. “They are so beautiful and they were planned so smartly. I call them gardens on the city scale. For example, Beijing has mountains, waters, lakes, bridges, towers. It was a very poetic city.”
“How can this traditional philosophy — which I think is very advanced — transform future cities?” he asked. “I think that leads us to a new route, besides the western typology.”
To understand contemporary art, it is necessary to investigate the connections that are sometimes omitted or undervalued in art history.
Gearhart founded a print gallery with her sisters and was at the center of the Arts and Crafts movement in southern California.
Featuring underwater recordings from around the world, this immersive, site-specific installation is on view at the Lenfest Center for the Arts in NYC from February 3 to 13.
Video art was something you watched “with the lights on,” as França insisted, without pretenses of high art.
PHASE 2 would emerge as an innovator in New York’s burgeoning subway art movement, creating elaborate murals that would shape the evolution of both the spray can and the art form.
BRIC’s multidisciplinary program in Brooklyn has cohorts in Contemporary Art, Film & TV, Performing Arts, and Video Art. Applications are due March 10.
While the South Asian diaspora is one of the largest and most widely dispersed in the world, the Indo-Caribbean community is often overlooked and excluded from discussions of South Asian art.
The Bay Area artist believed in shaping artists rather than relaying rules.
Open-ended, community based, and collaborative, “esolangs” serve as a reminder that digital art has other histories and other futures.
Working with what they had, Cass Corridor artists scrapped and repurposed anything they could get their hands on, attempting to find some salvation for their city through a literal process of salvage and reuse.
Throughout the 1970s and into the ’80s, artists in Los Angeles created organizations and exhibition spaces to develop the resources they lacked.