Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism. Become a member today »

Jackson Pollock, “Red Composition” (1946) (courtesy Christie’s)

Following a unanimous vote by the museum’s Board of Trustees, the Everson Museum of Art in downtown Syracuse, New York, is deaccessioning one of its highlight works, Jackson Pollock’s “Red Composition” (1946). Its sale will fund acquisitions of work by artists of color, women artists, and other marginalized artists underrepresented in the museum’s collection. The early Pollock painting will be included in Christie’s New York Evening Sale of 20th and 21st Century Art on October 6 and is estimated to sell for between $12 and 18 million.

Made in a significant year for Pollock, “Red Composition” is among the first works to feature the artist’s hallmark drip technique. Pollock and his wife, the artist Lee Krasner, had just moved to East Hampton, where a private studio converted from a barn gave him space to experiment with the technique. “Red Composition” is chronologically sandwiched between Pollock’s “Sound of Grass” series, examples of which are in the Guggenheim Museum and the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York, and “Free Form” (1946), also at MoMA. The painting’s provenance adds to its allure for potential buyers. The work was originally owned by Pollock’s friend and patron Peggy Guggenheim, one of the most important modern art collectors of her time. Guggenheim gave the painting to the son of Surrealist artist Max Ernst in 1947. Syracuse-born philanthropists Dorothy and Marshall M. Reisman purchased the work in the early 1950s and donated it to the Everson Museum in 1991.

The Everson Museum, an institution primarily known for its ceramics collection, has been working to diversify its holdings since 2017, when it established a Collecting Priorities Plan. In June 2020, the museum launched an Equity Task Force dedicated to promoting racial and economic justice throughout the institution, making the acquisition of works by marginalized groups one of its top priorities. In a statement, museum director Elizabeth Dunbar said:

The murder of George Floyd and a string of senseless killings of Black lives have propelled us into urgent discussions surrounding the Museum’s role and responsibility in fighting racism inside and outside our walls. Now is the time for action. By deaccessioning a single artwork, we can make enormous strides in building a collection that reflects the amazing diversity of our community and ensure that it remains accessible to all for generations to come.

In addition to diversifying the museum’s collection, funds from the sale will also be used to maintain some of the 10,000 objects already in the collection.

The Everson Museum is one of several institutions that have recently deaccessioned modern masterpieces to purchase work by marginalized artists. In 2018, the Baltimore Museum of Art sold seven artworks by names like Andy Warhol and Franz Kline to acquire more contemporary pieces by artists of color and women artists; in 2019, the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art sold a painting by Mark Rothko to the same end. The Everson Museum’s new acquisitions will begin in 2021.

Support Hyperallergic

As arts communities around the world experience a time of challenge and change, accessible, independent reporting on these developments is more important than ever. 

Please consider supporting our journalism, and help keep our independent reporting free and accessible to all.

Become a Member

Cassie Packard

Cassie Packard is a writer and cultural critic with bylines at publications including Artforum, frieze, and VICE, and is a regular contributor at Hyperallergic. She was previously a Researcher...

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. this was predictable. The excuse is just that. They could buy under represented art anytime they wanted. This is privitizing great art and much more will happen in the coming months behind closed doors.

    1. Wait — what? Why else would they “privatize” great art?

      Also this painting is…not one of Pollock’s better paintings.

  2. The intelligent management and use of a museum’s collection is a mirror of the collective intelligence and sophistication of its board and staff. in other words, not all deaccessioning is the same. But the active use of the collection is crucial to a museum’s primary responsibility –it’s community. The decision by the Everson seems to me an intelligent one, as the museum’s collection does not fully serve the needs of large segments of the community in which the museum is situated. In the long run, the sale of the Pollock will be seen as a turning point in the museum’s history. And I for one, applaud the vision of the staff and board for making such a bold and consequential decision.

Leave a comment