Reactor

Street Art via Infographic? [UPDATED]

by Hrag Vartanian on March 30, 2011

Daniel Feral's tribute diagram (click to enlarge)

Infographics never tell the whole story in that they omit details and attempt to make clear narratives where none exist. But Daniel Feral’s GRAFFITI & STREET ART graphic, which is labeled “a 75th Anniversary celebration of Alfred H. Barr, Jr’s CUBISM & ABSTRACT ART diagram,” attempts to create reason out of the more chaotic narratives of Graffiti and Street Art movements.

The image was recently broadcast to art peeps as part of the latest press release from the people behind the PANTHEON: A history of art from the streets of New York City exhibition, which you may remember from our post about their Kickstarter a while back.

I wonder if Feral realizes how reviled Barr’s original 1936 diagram is nowadays. Or maybe he’s doing this as a parody — which I thought it must be, when I first heard about it. Either way, I like the level of ambition in the diagram but it is a very subjective diagram — much like Barr’s — that demonstrates its maker’s own perspective, preferences and biases.

The images exclude a lot of categories and subcategories, and also emphasizes other facets that seem more marginal.

Looking at Feral’s infographic, here are the questions that come immediately to mind:

  • Where is the Chicano Mural Movement or the Mexican Muralists? The more I think about these groups the more influential their work seems.
  • What about gang graffiti?
  • Why is “Beautiful Losers” labeled as an NYC movement, even though it has always felt more like a left coast (or at least national) thing?
  • I really don’t know what Feral means by “Advertising Aesthetic,” since sign painters, and advertising have long influenced all of modern art. Perhaps its an attempt to find common ground?
  • Tom Otterness as “Public Art” in a graffiti/street art graphic is something I just don’t understand … not to mention “Deconstructivist Architecture” descends from graffiti … you got me with that one.
  • Also, I think tattoo culture seems like a large enough influence to get its own bubble.

Details aside, I hope more street artists create graphs like this, allowing us a glimpse at the their influences and thoughts about the graffiti and street art scene, as well as its history. Right now this infographic only exists online. Who’s going to put this thing on the side of a building? Now that would be street art history.

UPDATE: Jake Dobkin took up the infographic challenge and we thought we’d annotate it … hehehehe

  • Subscribe to the Hyperallergic newsletter for free weekly email updates!

  • http://twitter.com/johnpyper John Pyper

    And punk should be attached to graffiti in some way. I assume 70′s street art is the Lower East Side/Bowery? And no Keith Haring anywhere? speaking of early graffiti data- http://artjournal.collegeart.org/?p=1360

    • http://bespangled.tumblr.com Janelle

      Maybe Haring (and presumably Basquiat) is (are) included in the Proto-Graf (late 80s NYC) ?

  • http://twitter.com/carotweet Carolina

    …The map of interactions/inspirations is probably infinite, but I always somehow assumed some kind of role of Land Art and Arte Povera, at least in the more arty/intellectual types like for example Blu? (Probably not coincidentally being Italian, but I’ve really seen some very Arte Povera-ish elements in his videos …?)

    • http://twitter.com/chaykak Kyle Chayka

      I really like the comparison of Blu to Arte Povera, I could see that.

  • Zilda

    You can also add “GRAFF VIDEO” (since 2000s) on this diagram. More info on http://graff.video.free.fr

  • Pingback: Граффити-карты в спросе… но попробуйте в них разобраться! | ШКОЛА ГРАФФИТИ

  • http://hragv.com Hrag Vartanian

    Yes, I could see Arte Povera but I think more in Mark Jenkins works than Blu.

Previous post:

Next post: