• Victornyc01

    A description ( and rather fascile one at that) of the film with “Art stoner” in the headline and a “giggle inducing” reading of the filmmaker’s big picture conclusion? Really, what was this writer smoking?

    • http://hragv.com Hrag Vartanian

      Honestly, have you seen a Herzog film and not laughed at the uber-seriousness of it all? Another friend just mentioned on Twitter that he feel asleep during the film. Seems to have reactions of all types.

  • Victornyc01

    I saw it just yesterday, having gone in with some skepticism (3D etc). I think Herzog is a romantic in the end, and I’d be happy to argue that his brand of it is hard won. So, from that “perch”, I don’t understand why anyone would laugh, except to be cynical. 

    There were funny moments, for sure (he does have a sense of humor) but I do think he takes these endeavors seriously,  so it’s a little anti-intellectual to point the ‘nerd’ finger at him and giggle for his  ’uber-seriousness’. Look, he’s 68, has done his time and brings all of that to bear with every new picture. So I think  there’s a solid place for Serious in his take on things. 

    Well, I  thought it was a pretty moving piece of film would definitely not say it’s for everyone; you do need a little (necessary) patience with it—as is the case with art generally—and…not everything should be summed in 140 characters or less. Perhaps Hangover II is the alternative to that.

    • http://hragv.com Hrag Vartanian

      Don’t get me wrong, we all love Herzog and to be honest I thought stoner flick was a good thing. It represents to me a journey through a type of sensory experience that expands your mind. Herzog is unique and he transforms whatever her touches. I plan to see this film ASAP … I felt Cat’s review convinced me to see it. I wasn’t sure if I would. But come on, 3-D footage of cave paintings just sounds sooo trippy!!

      p.s. I hate the whole Hangover 1, I don’t think I could survive #2. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000405617907 Cat Weaver

       I thought my review was mixed, but overall positive: I enjoyed the movie and, as Hrag says, “we all love Herzog.”

      I don’t exempt the artists I love from my critical view: Herzog is indeed sometimes funny (and not always on purpose <– which is even funnier); the times when he expounds about the dark nature of things, when he asks clearly absurd questions like "Are we truly the crocodiles..?" and even his monotone drone, these things have inspired laughs for some decades now: if you've never sensed the humor in any of that then your compass is off.

      Anyway, you should check out the link from giggle-inducing and see if
      you don't also losen up a bit.

      • Victornyc01

        I know the Curious George bit, it’s funny…for half a second, and not because I’m all insensitive to the whole accent thing either.  There was no argument about Herzog’s sense of humor (but now mine is apparently being challenged? lovely! :-) ). 
        My take was that your piece (maybe) had some requirement to be at least X% funny but it didn’t have to happen at the expense of the artist in that way. So I just didn’t get that bit. 
        Look, Herzog isn’t a sacred cow of mine, but when someone drops that much time/effort on a film project and comes away with a decent personal story, and then a writer writing about it peppers their “balanced” review with terms like like “patter” and “affable, if highly effected” (affected?), a reader might say “condenscension what?”. But hey, maybe that’s just your style. I guess I’ll have to read more to find out how to “loosen up”.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000405617907 Cat Weaver

          A lot of time can be put into a very good project which also has its flaws and its vulnerabilities. Herzog has his style and it can be taken as lightly as we want to take it! I take it lightly when he asks goofy questions and waxes morose and seriously when I see how he can still manages to approach cinematography with insight and flair.

          My style is irreverent: always. My REVIEWS and ESSAYS are not “balanced”: one does not read opinions for balance. My ARTICLES, though, are (I hope)  fair and balanced –although I never shun opinion — I take pains to be thorough when I write them.

          BTW: IS it “affected”? Doh! I thought affect was the verb and effect the noun… but I suspect you are correct.

  • Victornyc01

    I definitely felt different coming out of the theater than I was going in. I’d be curious to see your take  on it after you’ve checked it out. The 12:45 matinee is definitely the way to go. Yeah, not a fan of Hangover either. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000405617907 Cat Weaver

    A review of Hangover, (Spoken in Herzogian drone) Surely these men have found that the bounds of freindship are sadly no defense against the indifference of chaos. In choosing to fling themselves into adventure, and discarding the rule of civilization their manifest libidos, unleashed on the universe, came back to them, free and violent. How were they to know?

Mobile Theme