Reactor

Is a Hip Home Base Necessary for Good Art?

by Kyle Chayka on November 27, 2012

Mural by BLU in Berlin’s Kreuzberg neighborhood (Image via Street Art Utopia)

In the latest installment in the New York Times Magazine‘s excellent Riff column, Robert F. Coleman recounts the story of how his band moved to Berlin, that well-known utopia of artists and creativity, and promptly failed.

Coleman’s story is a familiar one — he and his band wanted to find a city that felt fresh, dynamic, and accessible, one that had the benefits of both being affordable and fun. Berlin had a “laid-back lifestyle,” he writes, which we can safely say includes lots of nightlife, warehouse parties, and German beer (among other substances). In other words, they sought out a bohemian paradise.

In the beginning, that looked like it was working out well. Coleman and company met a slew of interesting, creative ex-pats, but slowly realized that the city wasn’t exactly conducive to getting stuff done. As one filmmaker told the writer, “In Los Angeles, people actually get stuff done because you’ll go homeless if you don’t hustle. Here you can be super poor for years and still live comfortably.” So is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Brooklyn’s Bushwick art neighborhood (Image via Art Observed)

For the band, it was bad. Distracted by nightly adventures and “raves at abandoned airports,” their work routine decayed. Though they had all the time and space in the world to rehearse, they had no drive to get it done. Coleman ended up leaving Berlin for the relative stresses of Melbourne.

It’s a cautionary tale of a too-cool environment taking away from the real work at hand. Sure, it’s great to live in an international artistic center, with the added bonuses of a supportive community, constant change, and a respect for the arts. But it also means there’s a lot of noise to be dealt with — life has to be balanced with getting down to the difficult labor of actually making things.

Brooklyn’s Bushwick, Berlin’s Kreuzberg, and London’s Shoreditch come with all the trappings of bohemian neighborhoods. You can get a good cup of coffee and stumble into an art gallery or studio without much difficulty, which is, of course, a nice quality for a home base to have. You can feel “cool” pretty easily, and the sense of healthy competition provides a constant inspiration to improve yourself and your work.

Isolation, on the other side of the equation, also has its advantages. It’s possible to work without interruption, to live cheaply, focus solely on your passions, and follow your own muse without comparing yourself to those around you. Monastic seclusion forces you to figure things out for yourself.

The lesson here seems to be that it’s not so much the place that guides how your work, whether that’s musical, artistic, or literary, turns out. It’s discipline, the ability to force out interruptions and maintain concentration on doing what you came to do. If you think a move to Berlin is going to make you a better artist, well, you should probably think twice.

  • Subscribe to the Hyperallergic email newsletter!

Hyperallergic welcomes comments and a lively discussion, but comments are moderated after being posted. For more details please read our comment policy.
  • Duane Thomas

    No

    • Duane Thomas

      … time is necessary for good art. Time is the most precious commodity of them all. If the art world shifted its focus from “who’s new” to “who’s spent the time” then a lot of bullshit would get filtered out.

      • Duane Thomas

        … and it’s why I believe craft will make a comeback over theory.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kim-Matthews/586667086 Kim Matthews

          It’s already happening.

  • punktoad

    If you need to make things you will, wherever you are. Some people need more inspiration while others need less distraction. The trick is knowing what geography works for you and finding it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Balhatain Brian Sherwin

    I’ve been saying this for years… the big art communities are not going away — if you must move… do it after you have developed a strong body of work. As you said, there is a lot of ‘noise’ to deal with in those centers. Not to mention that the cost of living tends to be high. You won’t get much art done if you have to work two to three ‘day jobs’ just to get by. And lets be honest… its not like those big art communities have open arms. The majority of dealers are not looking for new talent — that much is clear. As for the artist communities… welcome to the world of pecking orders. I can see how a masochist might enjoy that special blend of Hell… but my hope is that most artists will put their art first — and realize that they don’t have to be a part of that mix to create great art.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lisalevyindustries Lisa Levy

    So funny- coincidently, the photo of that building happens to be where I live. I’m the advice columnist for the Bushwick Daily and I try to impart the value of hard work like I did this week with the help of William Powhida. I think some people move to these areas for the social scene. At the end of the day, alot of artists are alone in studios, it doesn’t really matter where they are. http://bushwickdaily.com/2012/11/dr-lisa-are-private-sexual-fantasies-okay/

  • http://www.exiledstardust.com/ M. K. Hajdin

    People who advocate homelessness and destitution as “inspiration” to “get things done” are such incredibly privileged, self-absorbed assholes.

    Some of us can’t live at all unless we find a place where we can be “comfortable” in our poverty. Misery is extremely overrated as an artistic inspiration.

Previous post:

Next post: