Articles

Oklahoma Zoo Transforms Their Animals into Artists

by Allison Meier on January 3, 2013

Speedy the three-banded armadillo (all images courtesy the Oklahoma City Zoo)

Sure, humans tend to be the most dexterous of the animals, with their fancy thumbs and articulated motor skills, but can any people artists be as adorable as Speedy the three-banded armadillo? Unlikely. The South American mammal, whose defining skill is curling into a ball, is one of the many creatures creating art at the Oklahoma City Zoo as part of their “Art Gone Wild” program that uses painting as an avenue of animal engagement. While there are a lion’s share of painting elephants, apes, and rhinos garnering the occasional media attention, this zoo involves a level of biodiversity not seen elsewhere, with anaconda, wild dog, archer fish, red river hog, Komodo dragon, and okapi among the “artists.” The abstract color field results can be mixed (these are, after all, beings with an entirely different visual aesthetic from us), but when I recently talked over the phone with Tara Henson and Candice Rennels, director and manager respectively of marketing & public relations at the zoo, they emphasized the mutual benefit painting offers to the trainers and animals.

Speedy the Armadillo

Speedy painting

Speedy’s painting “An Armadillo of One”

“There’s no tricks, everything has a purpose,” Rennels said. For example, many of the painting actions correspond to those that aid the trainers in medical procedure or physical exams, like an ape offering his arm for an immunization could also reach out to a canvas with the same gesture, or an elephant blowing air through its trunk into a bag for a test can create “an awesome mist” effect in an art session. They also encourage a trusting relationship between the trainers and animals. All of the paint is nontoxic, of course, so the animals can slither through or submerge their paws in the colors without risk to their health. (For Speedy, being of a species of armadillo that swims, he has a tub at one end of his painting area to clean off after his time in his “studio,” which is basically a long box stacked with canvases globbed with paint in which food is hidden for him to forage through.)

Milk Snake creating some paintings

As for how much the animal is actually involved in selecting colors or creating forms, Rennels explained that “some have a higher level of thought process.” Sea lions, for instance, are color blind, so it’s the trainer dictating colors, but an elephant might favor orange paint if it is a fan of cantaloupes, associating the color with its favorite food. Their physical techniques always vary wildly, with snakes slithering through paint, leaving scale prints that would make ophiophobics shiver, and seals printing with their flippers in heavy swipes. Apes can actually pick up brushes; chimps tend to go for finger-painting.

“Deadliest Catch” painted by an anaconda

Woma python in a painting session

What the animals most get out of it is a departure from their normal routine, a mentally stimulating activity involving their natural behaviors that staves off boredom. Rennels said that for animals like snakes “it’s more of a senses experience, with the texture and temperature of the paint.” They also receive some sort of reward (usually a treat) when performing whatever action they use in their art. Hands down the most amazing painting processes and result is with the archer fish, which can shoot water out of its mouth to catch an insect in the wild. At the zoo, a keeper patiently dangles a cricket on fishing line in front of a canvas layered with paint, until the archer fish finally spits a stream of water, causing the cricket to fall into its tank and splashing the paint in an unexpected pattern. ”People are astonished that that artwork was created basically by a fish,” Rennels said.

Zeppy, a Salmon Crusted Cockatoo, demonstrating his brush strokes.

The art from the “animal enrichment” program is presented in an annual exhibition at a local art gallery, although it’s also available for sale online year-round. While absolutely no one will mistake the Komodo dragon’s painting for a piece by a tipsy Franz Kline, or the meerkat’s masterpiece for an extraordinarily lazy de Kooning, all the money raised by the sale of these experiments goes to support the zoo and conservation (this past year half was directed to the Okapi Wildlife Reserve in the Democratic Republic of Congo that was victimized in a violent attack). The Oklahoma City Zoo is now in its tenth year of the enrichment program, and the fourth year of hosting an exhibition, and is continuing to talk to other zoos and vets for more ideas of how to involve their animals. “This is first and foremost about the animals,” Rennels said. “We want to share with people the level of care we have for them.”

 

  • Subscribe to the Hyperallergic newsletter!

Hyperallergic welcomes comments and a lively discussion, but comments are moderated after being posted. For more details please read our comment policy.
  • ForLackOfAnimals

    I have a feeling it’s the zookeepers who “most get out of it is a departure from their normal
    routine, a mentally stimulating activity involving their natural
    behaviors that staves off boredom”. Furthermore, a treat is involved for performing the act – this type of training is despicable, especially in the cases of captive non-domesticated animals. Stop subjugating these animals to imprisonment, and on top of it all, a life full of ridiculous acts to satisfy your curiosities.

    • http://twitter.com/AllisonCMeier Allison C. Meier

      From talking with the representatives at the zoo, it’s definitely not that they are training them to paint, but using it as a creative activity for behaviors they would do anyway, or that are used in medical exams. As Candice said, “There’s no tricks, everything has a purpose.” As for the “imprisonment,” this is a zoo that’s very conservation-minded. Here’s more information on their site: http://www.okczoo.com/conservation/our-conservation-projects/

      • ForLackOfAnimals

        it is certainly training : whether it’s to extend an arm for physical examination or to receive a paintbrush – the repetition plus the reward makes this possible. what Candice is saying here is that everything has a human purpose – she is projecting her own human therapeutic processes unto very captive animals. not only this, but if it were strictly therapeutic, the zoo would not profit so directly from it – there is another capitalistic operation here, i hope you can see now.

        yes, very imprisoned animals who are marginalized despite any conservation efforts the zoo intends. they are not free to leave. they are there to stay. and paint sometimes. and i find that quite depressing.

        • http://twitter.com/AllisonCMeier Allison C. Meier

          I agree that discussions on the ethical nature of zoos are definitely important, and I think their awareness is a major part of zoos implementing these “enrichment” programs, but this was meant to be a report on an unexpected intersection with art.

  • http://twitter.com/AllisonCMeier Allison C. Meier

    There’s totally further room for discussion of programs like these in regards to animal behavior and zoos, and I would be interested in any further research you turned up. Definitely send it my way.

Previous post:

Next post: