The Phillips Collection has discovered an earlier painting by Picasso underneath a 1901 work by the artist, BBC News reported. Originally acquired by the institution in 1927, “The Blue Room,” which Picasso painted during his Blue Period, depicts a nude model bathing in his studio. Conservators at the Phillips Collection have known since 1954 that there was another painting below its surface, “as brushstrokes did not match the composition of a woman bathing in Picasso’s studio,” writes the BBC, but they did not know what that painting was.
In the 1990s, the museum conducted an X-ray that produced an unclear image of the scene beneath “The Blue Room.” In 2008, it began a targeted effort with the National Gallery of Art, Cornell University, and the Winterthur Museum in Delaware to uncover that image. The team used infrared and multispectral imaging, analysis of paint samples, and synchrotron scans to bring the buried picture to light, Elizabeth Lubbens, media relations coordinator for the Phillips told Hyperallergic.
What they found is a portrait of a man Picasso probably painted just before he did “The Blue Room.” Sporting a mustache and a beard, as well as a bow tie, the man hunches forward, his head resting against his right hand. He appears to wear rings on some of the fingers of that hand.
Although the image of the figure was resolved in 2008, “it was only a couple of months ago that the research team from the Phillips, Cornell, NGA, and Winterthur were able to all get together to consolidate the results of all the analyses carried out to date,” Lubben said. “Even though there is still more research to be done, we decided it was a good time to release the information that we have so far rather than sit on it for too much longer.”
More research includes attempting to the identify the mystery man. “While we will continue to explore who this man in the portrait might be, we do not have any firm ideas at this time,” Lubben told Hyperallergic.
Painting over previous works was not uncommon practice for the artists we now consider modern masters, as many of them were too poor to buy canvases every time they found something they wanted to paint. That was the case for Picasso around the turn of the 20th century, before he began making substantial money from his art. “He could not afford to acquire new canvasses every time he had an idea that he wanted to pursue,” Phillips Collection curator Susan Behrends is quoted as saying in the BBC article. “He worked sometimes on cardboard because canvas was so much more expensive.”
Moving too fast on your commute, looking out of the corner of your eye one second too late, and you might miss HOTTEA’s yarn installations.
Peruvian history is a contentious subject, and the authorities in charge of writing its first drafts should not be taken at their word.
Presented by Northwestern’s Block Museum and McCormick School of Engineering, this new exhibition seeks empathy at the boundaries of life. On view in Evanston, Illinois.
A little detail in an artwork can reveal that sometimes what is right on the surface can change our understanding of the whole.
Oh Shit! retraces the historical arc of feces from ancient Rome to the sewage challenges and potential innovations of the 21st century.
Located in Des Moines, Iowa, this residency for emerging and established artists includes studio and living space, a $1,000 monthly stipend, and more.
The controversial technology determined that the so-called de Brécy Tondo is an original by the Italian Renaissance master.
Specialists inflated the protest artwork as part of conservation testing at the Museum of London.
Fully-funded teaching assistantships are standard for MFA students at the top-ranked, flagship research university in the state of New York.
Some museums are opting for new language to describe the preserved individuals in their collections who were once living humans.
As art history buffs on the app have pointed out, both movements attribute meaning to the meaningless.