Peter Krashes’s paintings have often drawn on distinctly personal material: flight patterns circling his parent’s house, intimate portraits of his husband (the artist Oliver Herring) or Krashes’s own body undergoing physical therapy. In past bodies of work, he has utilized devices such as a distorting mirror, a camera obscura, panoramic lenses, shutters speeds, and strobes to create perceptual experiences that parallel the psychological disturbances, bafflement and ambiguities of his subjects. These devices have also inspired a variety of ways to apply paint to canvas: fast, slippery swooshes, choppy prismatic distortions, or spinning centrifugal wheels all figure into Krashes’s markmaking strategies. And, by incorporating these varied techniques, Krashes reinvigorates what have been his essential terrain: portrait, still life, and landscape genres.
In his current exhibition at the James Gallery at the City University of New York’s Graduate Center, Krashes has inverted his artistic practice, to look outward rather than inward. Around a decade ago, at the onset of the controversial Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park development project in Brooklyn, he became a community organizer in response to his studio, home and neighborhood being disrupted. This show is a ten-year survey concentrating on Krashes’s paintings that emerged in an almost symbiotic relationship to his political involvement. The show’s catalog details his day-to-day participation: planning and attending meetings, tussling with politicians and police, protesting, and bonding with neighbors and colleagues. The gallery pulses with colorful anecdotal details and inventive brushwork as Krashes allows you to study his hand and mind at work on the different platforms of activism and the creation of the painted image. The walls of the exhibition are encircled with diaristic paintings of macro and microscopic views of his experiences.
In large, panoramic images of courtrooms, peopled by reporters and cameramen, where legislation shaping our lives and futures plays out, Krashes’s oil paint often congeals into a hazy glare or a stuffy, clouded morass suggestive of bureaucratic inertia. The works draw attention to the artifice of pomp and ceremony, reminding us that mediated experiences are as much a part of our perceptions as lived, corporeal experience. Pictures of both law and order as staged sets and powerfully real events are delivered like sequences in a Brian De Palma film: through projections, atmospheric fog, film gels, skewed vantage points, and natural and artificial light. Krashes returns again and again to motifs of huddled masses, banks of cameras and microphones, walls of police, face-to-face collusion between the press and politicians, absentee officials, elected authorities, or angelic administrators. Some of the subjects, like the public advocate Letitia James, are revisited in different media, as if being electronically rebroadcast or recalled in dreams.
On the other end of the spectrum are the regular folks whose lives are upended by gentrification, and here Krashes’s paintings of neighbors and community are more celebratory. When he creates pictures of adults and children engaged with arts and craft mediums, designing banners and signage dribbled in tempera, or splashing around face paints and Easter egg dyes, he capitalizes on the chalky, opaque medium of gouache on paper to create a visual analogy. He crops in close on a child’s face or letterform, varies his brush size, and thins, sweeps, and overlays the paint so the viewer senses the intimacy of the act. Larger images of block parties with kids at play, are tilted, asymmetric compositions that blur the line between representation and abstraction. As figurative works, these share an affinity with action paintings — dynamic human presence materializes through centralized colors, patterns, and movement, a manifestation of the figures’ efforts and imagination.
Krashes’s work acknowledges our human existence as private beings in need of interaction with one another, and his decision to step outside himself and become an unpaid community organizer is inspiring. Many contemporary artists have been distracted, questioning the best use of their time in an increasingly corporatized America where the Trump administration daily amps up anxiety levels. The best art often addresses the context in which it is made, and Krashes’s ongoing project as an activist/painter underscores the winning formula of empathy over depersonalization.
Block Party: Peter Krashes continues at The James Gallery, The Graduate Center, CUNY, Manhattan through October 28.
To understand contemporary art, it is necessary to investigate the connections that are sometimes omitted or undervalued in art history.
Gearhart founded a print gallery with her sisters and was at the center of the Arts and Crafts movement in southern California.
Featuring underwater recordings from around the world, this immersive, site-specific installation is on view at the Lenfest Center for the Arts in NYC from February 3 to 13.
Video art was something you watched “with the lights on,” as França insisted, without pretenses of high art.
PHASE 2 would emerge as an innovator in New York’s burgeoning subway art movement, creating elaborate murals that would shape the evolution of both the spray can and the art form.
BRIC’s multidisciplinary program in Brooklyn has cohorts in Contemporary Art, Film & TV, Performing Arts, and Video Art. Applications are due March 10.
While the South Asian diaspora is one of the largest and most widely dispersed in the world, the Indo-Caribbean community is often overlooked and excluded from discussions of South Asian art.
The Bay Area artist believed in shaping artists rather than relaying rules.
Open-ended, community based, and collaborative, “esolangs” serve as a reminder that digital art has other histories and other futures.
Working with what they had, Cass Corridor artists scrapped and repurposed anything they could get their hands on, attempting to find some salvation for their city through a literal process of salvage and reuse.
Throughout the 1970s and into the ’80s, artists in Los Angeles created organizations and exhibition spaces to develop the resources they lacked.