British actor, theatre director, and playwright Mark Rylance has resigned as an associate artist of the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) after 30 years, admonishing the company’s ongoing ties to British Petroleum (BP). Rylance, who trained at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art in London, was the first artistic director of Shakespeare’s Globe in London, between 1995 and 2005. Today, the Oscar winner announced his decision to leave the RSC in a Guardian opinion article, explaining his need to sever ties with the company that has inspired him since his teenage years, “not because it is any less of a theatre company, but because of the company it keeps.”
In 2012, when the RSC initiated its partnership with BP, Rylance was among the signees of a letter to the company expressing concern that it was “allowing itself to be used by BP to obscure the destructive reality of its activities.”
That year, activist theatre group BP or not BP? launched a series of satirical, performance-based protests, which have continued ever since. This year, the group also led protests at the National Portrait Gallery and British Museum, urging them to sever their financial ties with BP.
The RSC later decided to remove BP’s logos from its plays, but the next year, worked with the oil company to sponsor a reduced ticket program for young adults between 16 and 25. In 2016, the RSC signed a contract to continue the program through 2022.
Rylance urges the company to ends this relationship much sooner, writing:
The RSC is well placed to make a positive statement about the responsibility of cultural organisations to act on the climate crisis. It could turn this situation on its head and give young people much more value than a cheap £5 ticket. It could give them the support of Shakespeare in their stand against our addiction to energy dealers who would willingly destroy us for a quick quid.
He has instead expressed his support for Culture Unstained’s Fossil Free £5 Ticket project, which crowdfunds to finance the reduced admission program.
Rylance said he met with environmentalist Jonathon Porritt to better understand BP’s role in climate change, to which Porritt told him:
Together with other oil majors, BP has been accused of fully understanding the science of climate change as far back as the early 1980s, and downplaying and obscuring that science ever since, always in the short-term interests of its shareholders. Regrettably, its current leadership is stuck in the same pattern — all the time using philanthropy to hide its past and present culpability.
“BP is also a powerful lobbyist,” Rylance writes. “It recently topped the list of firms obstructing climate action around the world and has been successfully lobbying President Trump for access to Arctic oil.”
In a longer version of the article published by Culture Unstained, Rylance claims that during an annual general meeting of the RSC in 2017, he asked about the sponsorship and was promised that RSC’s Associate Artists would be further involved in the company’s charitable objectives through “private consultation.”
“Hearing nothing, I recently let the RSC know that I feel I must resign as I do not wish to be associated with BP any more than I would with an arms dealer, a tobacco salesmen or any company or individual who willfully destroys the lives of others alive and unborn,” he continues. “Nor do I believe would William Shakespeare.”
“We are all together in this crisis and we all must change. I am resigning to lend strength to the voices within the RSC who want to be progressive, and to encourage my fellow associates to express themselves, too.”
At the time of writing, Hyperallergic has not received a response to its request for comment from the RSC.
The committee’s main responsibilities will be to shape policy goals, stimulate arts philanthropy, and advocate for the expansion of federal backing of the cultural sector.
Some museumgoers pointed out that the museum’s label omitted discussions of HIV/AIDS, which are at the heart of the work.
Featuring over 70 installations and performances at the George Washington University’s historic Flagg Building, the Corcoran’s end-of-year showcase is now available for virtual viewing.
But a museum in Harvard is still named after a member of the disgraced family, notorious for its role in the opioid crisis.
Parker’s stories bring so many of her works alive, give them meaning, and make us warm to her and to them. Is that a problem?
Artists reflect on histories of oppressive power structures in Brazil in this exhibition at the Visual Arts Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
The works, and worlds, on display in Hancock’s exhibition seem saturated with a desire for narrative redemption through self-observation and aspects of his Christian upbringing.
The problem with Andrew Dominik’s biopic Blonde is its assumption that Monroe’s victimization was the most fascinating thing about her.
When I recently came across Sandra Cattaneo Adorno’s photo book Águas de Ouro, I could hear the waves and boomboxes, and even taste the salt on my lips.
Works by over 70 artists of the pan-South Asian diaspora were up for auction to help Pakistan’s most vulnerable communities in a women- and queer-led initiative.
The board of 70 Washington Street in Brooklyn, which previously housed an artist residency, is weighing the replacement of Helen Brough’s “Emulated Flora” with generic photographs of Brooklyn landmarks.