Last week, the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish civil rights organization headquartered in the United States, added 36 symbols to its “Hate on Display” database, including one highly visible symbol that has come to be associated with the Trump administration and its followers, the index finger-to-thumb “OK” sign.
Since the 2016 US general election, images associated with the alt-right and white nationalism have become more mainstream, often taking on more subtle imagery that is lost on outsiders (like Skittles). But as the movement is buoyed by powerful world leaders endorsing policies that were once seen as extremism, those images have gained renewed currency with right-wing supporters online.
In addition to the “OK” symbol, other images have been added, including Dylan Roof’s “bowlcut” haircut, which is being used by white supremacists to glorify the terrorist who killed nine black people in 2016; the “Happy Merchant” image, which depicts an extreme stereotype of a Jewish man rubbing his hands together; and the “Moon Man,” which is a play on a 1980s-era McDonald’s commercial and is used by white supremacists as a character to make videos using racist raps. Also added to the database are all burning Neo-Nazi symbols, the “Diversity = White Genocide” and “It’s Okay to be White” slogans, the phrase “Anudda Shoah,” which is used to mock Jews and the Holocaust, and the logos of white nationalist groups, including the Rise Above Movement, American Identity Movement, League of the South, Patriot Front, and the National Socialist Legion.
The news also demonstrates the shifting terrain for symbols of hate and how it has proven difficult to identify and categorize such imagery. In the case of the “OK” symbol, the ADL officially said it was not a hate symbol in 2017 before seeing new evidence and changing their official stance this year. What may have started as a troll of liberals and the left has since evolved into a legitimate symbol of the global white nationalist movement, suggesting the internet is complicating the dissemination and meaning of the image. The “OK” symbol was also added as an emoji by all platforms in 2015, before any of the controversy started, which raises questions about how the emoji is used by users today.
It’s worth mentioning that while the burning Neo-Nazi symbols clearly mimic the image of the Ku Klux Klan’s (KKK) burning cross, the original burning cross was first introduced into popular culture by DW Griffith’s Birth of a Nation (1915) and adopted by the KKK soon after the film debuted. In an age of social media and disinformation, that kind of adoption presumably happens faster than ever before.
Unfortunately, the identification of these symbols hasn’t slowed their prevalence in digital, shareable spaces. A July 2019 ADL survey found that nearly one-quarter (23%) of all online gamers have been exposed to white supremacist ideology while gaming.
Curator La Tanya S. Autry shares a set of crucial questions she considers when curating images of anti-Black violence.
Crys Yin’s subject is grief, which, for all that takes place in public, is largely a private matter.
The first lecture is on the relationship between early portrait photography and diverse notions of US identity during the Gilded Age. Register to attend on January 25.
With her clay relief sculptures, Brie Ruais probes the exit wound and its deep psychological implications.
In Doomscrolling, Rob Swainston and Zorawar Sidhu assume the task Walter Benjamin set for the articulation of history — to “seize hold of the past as it flashes up at a moment of danger.”
Part of the university’s Artists on the Future series pairing renowned artists with cultural thought leaders, this online event is free and open to the public.
When we honor King publicly, as many in the art circle did on Monday, we use these moments to do more than just remember and pay tribute.
A study that reexamined Homo sapiens fossils found our species is 30,000 years older than previously believed.
As much as I appreciate the collective’s culture jamming initiatives, I don’t know that their putative premise ever bears meaningful fruit.
The banana’s dominance and ubiquity has had serious and far-reaching implications for the region, engendering exploitative labor systems, climate change, and migration.
Charles Dellheim’s study tells the tale of a small group of Jewish art dealers and collectors who played a key role in the changing art world of the 19th and 20th centuries.