Perhaps you have seen that Paris’s iconic Arc de Triomphe — like the Pont Neuf and Berlin’s Reichstag before it — has been wrapped in fabric, the posthumous realization of a project by the artist-couple Christo and Jeanne-Claude.
Perhaps you also noticed, scattered across headlines and social media, the pernicious tendency of journalists to attribute this work to Christo alone, though L’Arc de Triomphe, Wrapped is the product of the duo’s decades-long collaboration and a dream both of them shared.
If you didn’t notice the mistake — in headlines published by the Wall Street Journal and the LA Times, as well as on Instagram where the project’s official hashtag is #christoparis — I wouldn’t be surprised. This is by no means the first time one half of the artist pair — notably, the female half — has been left out of the equation. Initially the couple themselves did this. Though their collaboration began in the 1960s (their first project was realized in 1961, and then they married in 1962), it wasn’t until 1994, when they retroactively labeled all previous public work as authored by both artists, that the collaborative moniker “Christo and Jeanne-Claude” was made official.
Though the world has had a good 27 years to get used to it, the artists’ website recognizes the continued potential for confusion. It spells it out for anyone who can’t wrap their minds around art made by equal contributions of two people of different genders: “All the early works … as well as all preparatory drawings, collages, and scale models are works by ‘Christo’ only …. However, all projects and indoor installations, both realized and non-realized, are works by ‘Christo and Jeanne-Claude’.”
Excluding Jeanne-Claude from headlines and descriptions is, therefore, factually inaccurate. (Would you ever talk about Gilbert without mentioning George?) If the media treated this oversight as such, the error would be rectified immediately. A retraction would be issued and an apology made. But the fact that this error keeps appearing — in some of the world’s largest (and most meticulously edited) papers — is an indication that giving deserved credit to women is not in their style guide.
Unfortunately, New York’s hometown paper is no exception. When Jeanne-Claude died in 2009, the New York Times published an obituary that cast her in the studio assistant role, a mistake only made more stark when reading Christo’s recent obituary from 2020. Though the Times is careful to point out Jeanne-Claude as “wife and collaborator,” the writer of both pieces, William Grimes, doesn’t seem fully convinced of this, since the wording of each obituary does not express equality. Christo’s largely confers credit to the artist alone (referring to “The Gates” as “Christo’s” project), while Jeanne-Claude’s continually specifies joint spousal effort, labeling their work, somewhat awkwardly, “the art of her and her husband.”
At the time of Jeanne-Claude’s death, then-mayor Michael Bloomberg — no doubt thinking he was paying the artist a compliment — released a statement saying that “The Gates,” a 2005 installation mounted in the city’s Central Park, “would never have happened without Jeanne-Claude.” While this is technically correct, saying so is like saying Simon and Garfunkel wasn’t possible without Paul Simon. In other words, it’s utterly and completely obvious.
Sadly, though by no means surprisingly, there is precedence for this female erasure. Women have been and continue to be the executors of the invisible, unpaid, unaccredited labor that makes much of the world run smoothly. Globally, our work hours are worth trillions of dollars per year. Wives, very often, make their husbands’ careers possible, through a variety of support: from childcare to coaching, encouragement to straight up collaboration. Artists’ wives (who are often artists themselves) are no exception.
Artists’ wives have acted as studio assistants, advocates, babysitters, and breadwinners, some even giving up their own practices for the sake of their husbands’ work. History has not recorded the full extent of these women’s influence, and we may never know the full scope of the impact they have made on the history of art.
But in the case of Jeanne-Claude, we do know. Her impact is evident as it rises from the center of the Place Charles de Gaulle, covering one of Paris’s most recognizable monuments. It’s ironic, however, that despite how large this work looms, she has been diminished.
Increased oil tanker truck traffic would “seriously degrade” the experience of viewing the canyon’s Indigenous rock art, said one advocate of the site.
This week, AP Style Twitter goes wild, the “enshittification” of TikTok, and did people actually come flooding back to New York City after COVID?
Scores of cultural heritage sites are in ruins amid a fragile truce and an ongoing war of narratives.
Jafar Panahi was arrested last July, after he participated in protests at the notorious Evin prison.
Join the New-York Historical Society on February 10 for a virtual conversation about our changing relationship to the natural world with Julie Decker, John Grade, and LaMont Hamilton.
Designed by artist Christine Egaña Navin, the items will be offered by Project Art Distribution at this weekend’s NADA Flea Market.
The French painter felt he had to rise to the challenge of one question above all things else: What exactly is it to be a modern artist?
Philipsz’s haunting sound and video artworks serve as a poignant witness to the lives and artistry of victims of the Holocaust.
Passamaquoddy citizen Chris Newell is imparting his knowledge of the Wabanaki Confederacy to advise on the Portland Museum of Art’s expansion.
Presented by Northwestern’s Block Museum and McCormick School of Engineering, this new exhibition seeks empathy at the boundaries of life. On view in Evanston, Illinois.
The artist’s site-specific museum exhibition Three Parallels glows with choreographed colored light.
In an open letter, European institutional leaders defend Manuel Borja-Villel, who has faced right-wing attacks for his progressive programming.