David Frum is perhaps best known for penning former United States President George W. Bush’s infamous “Axis of Evil” speech, which preceded the US invasion of Iraq. This single piece of writing resulted in untold Iraqi deaths and suffering and the looting of more than 17,000 ancient Iraqi artifacts. While US authorities have since returned them, Frum has laundered his reputation through the liberal establishment, landing comfortably at one of its largest magazines, the Atlantic. His latest polemic on the repatriation of the Benin bronzes is a quintessential lesson in art world nepotism and colonial projection.
“Who Benefits When Western Museums Return Looted Art?” positions the discourse around the Benin bronzes at a crossroads. While museums should return them, Frum writes, an emergent ownership debate between the Nigerian state and Edo monarchy reveals a deeper institutional dilemma. To make his case, Frum traveled to Nigeria and spoke with Governor Godwin Obaseki, who is overseeing the new Edo Museum of West African Art, as well as Minister of Information and Culture Lai Mohammed and Oba of Benin Ewuare II.
From the get-go, Frum mocks repatriation efforts as a “ritual of self-purification through purgation.” For transparency, he cites his own parents’ status as collectors of African art who fought for its representation in Canadian museums (and even notes that he and some living family members still own some pieces). Rather than accept the merits of today’s decolonial critiques, Frum presents what he calls a “defense of the existing.” Certainly Western museums “trace their origins to the crimes of kings and the arrogance of colonizers,” he writes, but they also “allow tens of millions of people to enjoy what were once the personal pleasures of a wealthy, powerful, titled few.”
This interesting choice of language seems somewhat in line with the progressive wing of Democrats that grew from Occupy Wall Street. But for a former Bush staffer in a position of journalistic power, Frum’s condemnations of “corrupt officialdom” in the Nigerian government and “crumbling” national museum infrastructure sound all too familiar. It seems that Frum’s subtle regime change argument begins at the level of culture: If Western elites have no say in what Africans do with their history, then how will they influence what Africans do about their future?
None of this should be surprising for a magazine that once published an essay titled “In Defense of Empire.” Frum himself has gone to bat for US imperialism countless times and even defended core ideas of the malign speech he wrote for Bush. Should Frum’s expertise here go unquestioned, even though he is responsible for destabilizing an entire region in the Global South? “The human past was a grim place for almost everybody,” Frum so eloquently writes. Indeed it was, but not all of us have a personal stake in the ownership of possibly plundered art, or a legacy of genocidal government policy haunting us to this day.
Repatriation is a first step in closing off Western intervention, and Frum says we should think twice. As Dan Hicks recently wrote for Hyperallergic, Britain’s art-world elite likewise consent to repatriation but espouse this “slippery slope” argument against decolonization. “Giving back is the necessary first step; but restitution is also about giving something up,” Hicks contends. Frum offers few solutions but asserts that Africa still needs us, all while citing Hicks as the foil to his paternalistic rhetoric and avoiding any discussion of the growing US military presence on the continent.
Should we trust an architect of the Iraq War on this, or on anything at this point? Even if there is a Nigerian political crisis — thinking of the #EndSARS protests, which he doesn’t mention — Frum is one of the last people who should speak on it.
What would it look like if museums turned their billions toward positive good instead of questionable investments simply for profit?
Patricio Guzmán combines reflection on the past, observation of the present, and hope for the future into an expansive vision of all the ideas he’s explored in his work.
Artists reflect on histories of oppressive power structures in Brazil in this exhibition at the Visual Arts Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
So closely do Disney’s animators assimilate the sensibility of French design that on occasion their source material appears almost more Disney than Disney itself.
The Grand Avenue Billboard Project enables artists like Karen Fiorito to publicly express their political views.
The museum opens to the public on October 8 with a 24-hour kickoff and a rebooted California Biennial.
The report estimates that 6.7 million Indigenous objects and human remains continue to be held in Canadian institutions, most of which do not have formal repatriation policies.
Funding options at UB include full-tuition scholarships for MFA students, the Arthur A. Schomburg Fellowship Program, and additional opportunities for MA students.
The Association of Art Museum Directors announced a shift in its longstanding policy, which restricted the use of funds from sales of art to new acquisitions only.
Martín Mobarak may have broken Mexican law, but he burned the proof.
Your list of must-see, fun, insightful, and very Los Angeles art events this month, including the Maya Codex of Mexico at the Getty, Beatrice Wood, Trenton Doyle Hancock, and more.