Curated by Bice Curiger, best known as the editor-in-chief and co-founder of the respected art magazine Parkett, the 2011 Venice Biennale will be titled ILLUMInations, in a play on words and typography that now comes standard for big deal exhibitions. The name is a combo of “illuminate” and “nations,” terms that Curiger uses to refer to the “dissemination” of the “current developments in international art.”
In other words, the Biennale will take as its theme the spread of ideas and artistic currents beyond the limitations of national boundaries and identities, taking on culture at the international level rather than on a country-to-country basis. Yet the Biennale is known for its use of national pavilions to stage exhibitions as something akin to national artistic showcases. How do you go post-national with a nationally and politically charged event?
Some background explanation is needed to parse this. Hosted every two years in a collection of pavilions sprinkled around the city of Venice plus a massive renovated arsenal-turned-gallery, the Venice Biennale is one of the seminal events of the contemporary art world. The Biennale is composed of two main components: the “International Exhibiton,” marshaled by a single director-curator (Curiger), is mounted throughout a central pavilion and the Arsenale space, while the “National Participations” are shown in national pavilions, devoted spaces where participating countries can showcase their own choice of curators and artists. Many of these spaces are located in Venice’s Giardini (Google map), a meandering garden that collects the small buildings; a contemporary art amusement park.
Curiger writes on the Biennale’s website that the National Pavilions may seem anachronistic, but “can be a tool to reflect upon the issue of identity. I wish to reinforce the sense of unity between the International Exhibition and the National Participations.” “Para-Pavilions” staged in relation to the Arsenale exhibition will further break down the relationship between individual artists and their national identities. But wait! There’s more! Curiger throws in Tintoretto for good measure, a Venetian painter known for depicting the city’s stunning light. The painter will provide an emotional connection to the locality of Venice, but more conceptually, Curiger refers to Tintoretto’s “reckless approach to composition” that overturned “the well-defined, classical order of the Renaissance,” as well as the artist’s sense of light, “which is not rational but ecstatic.”
I think Curiger is making a case for postmodernism and post-nationalism as solid intellectual foundations in opposition to the binding modernism of tradition. By subverting the art historical routes of the national pavilions and seeking to disrupt the black and white idea of identity that these purport, Curiger can create an environment for contemporary art outside of national discourse. Tintoretto comes in as a precedent for an intelligent subverting of the rational order. Just as the painter’s light is “ecstatic,” so too is postmodernism, a cacophony of voices and artists without boundaries or limits. The fluidity of an ecstatic rather than rational order might be just what the Biennale needs to shake it up. What might be in the cards for Curiger? Collaborative exhibitions between nations? The switching up of the national pavilions, like a contemporary art trading spaces?
Since more than a few countries have already announced the artists and exhibitions they’ll be staging at their pavilions, this guess seems unlikely, but wouldn’t it be fun? I’d like to see the US cope with something funky like China’s space, or a less well-known country be given the run of the German pavilion. For a full list of the artists nations have chosen for their pavilions, check out this list from Artinfo and Yahoo News. Notably, the US has chosen Puerto Rican duo Allora & Calzadilla as representatives, the first time we’ve showcased a collective rather than an individual artist.
The 2011 Venice Biennale will take place June 4 – November 27, 2011. We’ll keep you posted on updates to exhibition and artist plans for the event.
How does a selective competition fit with the contemporary art world’s aspirations toward greater inclusivity?
Critical race theory, which has been attacked by conservative lawmakers, is conspicuously absent, as are many contemporary and living Black artists.
“Dignity of Earth and Sky,” unveiled in 2016, raises questions about who should depict Native people and how they should be portrayed.
In this online exhibition, Indigenous artists reclaim realities long denied them by US and Canadian federal governments — including moments of collective reverie.
At this year’s Sundance International Film Festival, more than half the feature-length movies were made by directors who identify as women.
In her novel Tell Me I’m an Artist, Chelsea Martin questions whether art offers a refuge from the world.
Ten artists will receive studio space and access to faculty, staff, students, workshops, and programming at an arts institution in the heart of Philadelphia.
The US government has lifted a Trump-era ban that kept formerly imprisoned people from accessing their works.
A work of art will be on the line when the Philadelphia Eagles play the Kansas City Chiefs this Sunday.
With two exhibitions at SoFi Stadium, the Kinsey African American Art & History Collection seeks to engage a different art audience.
The works that best exemplify a uniquely German grotesque in Reexamining the Grotesque are those that reflect the war and Weimar years.