A 2011 exhibition organized by Creative Time has traveled to Israel, including the military-linked Technion University, renewing longstanding criticism of the organization’s sensitivity to artists participating in the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement (image via Wikimedia)

The revelation that a Creative Time exhibition curated by Nato Thompson has traveled to Israel unbeknownst to participants has drawn sharp rebukes from artists subscribing to the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, including the immediate withdrawal of one artist contacted by Hyperallergic with the news. Independent Curators International (ICI), the group partnering with Creative Time, a major New York arts nonprofit, for the international tour of the 21-artist exhibition, yesterday sent a letter to participants retroactively seeking permission to show their work in Israel, some six months after the show first appeared in the country. The belated request, in which ICI cites possible BDS objections and states it “feel[s] strongly about the right of others to boycott,” appears to have been prompted by objections raised over social media by Occupy Theory, an activist group that has, along with others, previously engaged Creative Time on the subject of the BDS cultural boycott of Israel, drawing specific assurances of transparency from the organization in 2012 and 2013.

D9N-RaamHaShachar02 (1)

This type of unmanned bulldozer developed at Technion University was deployed during Operation Cast Lead, a war that killed around 1,400 Palestinians (image via Wikimedia)

In a private Facebook post yesterday, Occupy Theory’s Amin Husain, a Palestinian-American artist, denounced the exhibition’s appearance in Israel without the consultation of participating artists, which he alleges violates Creative Time director Anne Pasternak’s 2012 statement on the issue. “We respect and work to protect the right of anyone to participate in the BDS campaign,” Pasternak wrote then in a detailed response to artist protests over a controversial Israeli partnership.

Creative Time chief curator Nato Thompson struck a note of contrition, offering the following in the thread on Husain’s Facebook page:

To clarify, ICI is our partner who is touring this project. The arrangement happened fast and we are in discussions now trying to get ahead of something that has gotten away from us. We are aware of the seriousness of this and should have a statement soon.

The exhibition in question, Living as Form (The Nomadic Version), like much of the rest of Creative Time’s work features a number of political artists, including Decolonizing Architecture, a group whose practice is premised on pro-Palestinian advocacy. Reached by email late last night, Decolonizing Architecture stated that they were “absolutely not aware” of the exhibition’s presence in Israel until Hyperallergic reached out, and alerted Creative Time of their wish to withdraw from the show immediately. “[I]t takes us by surprise to know that we are exhibiting in Israel without our knowledge. It is simply unacceptable from our side,” they said, adding that they hadn’t heard from Creative Time since the exhibition’s first iteration in New York closed in October 2011.

Another collective in the exhibition told Hyperallergic that they had also not heard of this component of the show’s travel itinerary and were unfamiliar with the BDS movement. “I have never heard about this travel of the show and we artists somehow delegate to CT to deal with this issue of places,” the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said.

“It’s not about this show. It’s about a pattern. This is an organization whose sole mission is exploring social justice issues via art, and it’s not being straightforward with its artists about something that clearly matters to people,” Amin said.

Particularly at issue is the venue of The Technion, the show’s second and current host in Israel after a stint at Artport Tel Aviv from December 6 to March 7. The university, also known as the Israeli Institute of Technology, has extensive research-and-development links to the Israeli Defense Forces. These links were damningly investigated by Adam Hudson in a 2,500-word essay for The Nation appearing in March of last year on the backlash against New York’s proposed $2 billion Cornell-Technion campus, which is slated to begin accepting students on Roosevelt Island in 2017. Hudson details the ties between Technion, Israel’s premier institute of technology, and its military apparatus, noting that:

Technion conducts research and development into military technology that Israel relies on to sustain its occupation of Palestinian land. For example, Technion developed an unmanned D-9 bulldozer for the Israeli military, which it used during Operation Cast Lead, a war that killed around 1,400 Palestinians, mostly civilians, and thirteen Israelis. Because of the machine’s “exceptional results” in Cast Lead, Israel is expanding its use of unmanned bulldozers … Currently, more than half-a-million Israeli settlers live in the occupied territories; that number continues to rise. Technion also has partnerships with Israeli arms companies, such as Elbit and Rafael. Elbit provides surveillance equipment for the separation wall, such as cameras and drones, while Rafael manufactures missiles that accompany drones and an armor protection system for the Israeli Defense Forces’ (IDF) Mk4 battle tank.

What’s more, Hudson argues that the soft-power instrumentality of an enlightened higher education campus is central to self-professed Israeli strategy of rebranding its national image away from military themes. (He writes: “Ido Aharoni, Consul General of Israel in New York, told The Jewish Week that Technion’s partnership with Cornell ‘is of strategic importance in terms of positioning Israel not only in America, but all over the world, as a bastion of creativity and innovation.’”)

Reached for comment late yesterday afternoon, Nato Thompson told Hyperallergic that a statement would be forthcoming from Creative Time “shortly,” and did not respond to follow-up queries about his knowledge of the exhibition’s travel itinerary. We will update this space when we receive comment. [See update below.]

Here is the full text of the letter sent by ICI to the 21 artists showing in the exhibition on Wednesday, June 4:

I hope this letter finds you very well. I’m writing to you today about your participation in Living as Form (The Nomadic Version).

As the exhibition continues to tour, I would like to bring your attention to it being shown at two venues in Israel, Artport in Tel Aviv earlier this year, and now at the Paul Konrad Hoenich Gallery of Experimental Art and Architecture, a university gallery part of the Israel Institute of Technology, in Haifa.

This presentation features a selection of 21 artists and collectives, including your work, and I wanted to reach out to you personally because of issues related to working with organizations in Israel.

ICI’s broad network of curators, artists and art spaces from around the world encompasses different positions and responses to Israel and the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict. While ICI does not take part in the boycott of Israel under BDS or other frameworks, we feel strongly about the right of others to boycott. So if you would like to discuss your participation in this presentation of the exhibition, please contact me by email or directly on my cell phone at [Redacted]  so that we can make sure that your positions are respected. Thank you in advance for your attention to this.

Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you once again for being part of this exhibition, which has already traveled to 16 venues in just two years, actively reaching out to audiences from around the world, in places including California, Taiwan, and Western Sahara. We are proud of this great success and moved by the engagement generated by the show at every stop of the tour. Thank you!

Update, 6/5 3:55pmWe have yet to receive a statement from Creative Time, but after this story was published this morning, Thompson posted the below on Husain’s private Facebook page on behalf of the organization:

As we have stated in the past, the commitment to the free exchange of ideas has always been central to Creative Time’s mission, and thus we do not participate in cultural boycotts (CT’s Statement of Commitment to Universal Human Rights and Free Expression). We believe the activist practices as demonstrated in the Living as Form show can contribute to society by raising awareness, help correct injustices done around the globe, honor international standards of human rights, and lead to a more just world.

Living as Form (The Nomadic Version) has traveled to more than a dozen places as part of a tour organized by Independent Curators International (ICI). The exhibition consists of documents downloadable from a hard-drive and has been shown from Mexico to South Korea and Taiwan, and will soon open in North Dakota. Recently ICI has arranged for a tour of the show to two venues in Israel.

Creative Time does not have any financial relationship with the show’s tour.

Update, 6/5 5:59pm: Creative Time has reached out to Hyperallergic with a copy of the above statement. Reached by phone, director Anne Pasternak said that “as an organization with global reach we can’t be part of a boycott, no matter what our personal sympathies may be.” Though she stressed that the show’s itinerary was set by co-organizer ICI, she acknowledged her organization’s failure to notify artists. “When the show opened in Tel Aviv six months ago we were so swamped with Kara Walker, it didn’t register. It should have registered, what we should have done is call the artists then … We are taking a look at our internal processes,” she said.

Mostafa Heddaya is the former managing editor of Hyperallergic.

15 replies on “Creative Time Reneges on Promise to BDS Artists with Israel Exhibition, Artist Withdraws [UPDATED]”

    1. His comment is not out of bounds. The double standard is applied to israel alone which seems to be the only country boycotted for perceived crimes–no one boycotts Britain over Falklands, turkey over Cyprus, China for it’s occupation of various island etc. etc etc. They are boycotting israel bc they cannot stand that Jews have sovereignty over any parcel of land. Israel won the westbank from Jordan in a defensive war 1967. It has a legal claim to the land according to international law. Stating otherwise a million times doesn’t change that. The architects of UN resolution 242 clearly say that it does not obligate Israel to relinquish all the land it won defending itself. The Palestinians will not have any state of their own until they recognize israel and stop lobbing missiles and suicide bombers at the one jewish state. Their BDS diplomatic offensive will fail along with their terror strategy of the 90s-2006, and their conventional war strategy of 1948-1980s.

      1. Lots of “they”s in your statement, and it’s funny you mention UN resolutions, since there are many for both sides (not just the pro-Israeli ones):
        No one is boycotting China? Huh? They may be largely unsuccessful, but that’s not to say they don’t exist. Free Tibet-related boycotts have been going on for decades, for instance. And there are boycotts of Iran, Russia, Denmark, Syria, and other places to varying degrees and by various entities and countries.

        1. Hrag– The point, as you well know, is that there is no large group of artist-activists and academics nor Occupy group that is trying to get artists to drop out of shows in China, Russia, Sharjah. Has Creative Time published a “letter of transparency” about relations with any of those countries?

    2. Heeeey……GET OFF THE HRAG… Vartanian!!! The Jews are close kins to the Armenians… you gonna side with the araaaabs? I assume you’re too smart to take the side of people who cut the heads off of American Journalists just because they are Jewish????…kill any Jew it’s the same as an Israeli? All the Stupid young American Jewish college students who are backing this BDS movement have their brains up their Tuccos’s….now prove to me you can think!!!

      1. hard to believe international communities don’t know about Israeli Apartheid after 66 years.

    1. Hi Steve,

      Exhibiting with Artport does not violate pacbi because it is a private institution that is not funded by Israeli gov’t nor military.

      Of course, the Arison family may as well be the Bank of Israel, but bds is specifically not aimed at boycotting Israelis. It us aimed at the gov’t and military and complicit insitutions.

  1. An Open Letter to Creative Time: I say the following as a Palestinian raised in Palestine and forced out. Art is not neutral and neither is a social justice mission (whether actual or perceived) that, in the name of global justice, neglects a systematic annihilation of an indigenous people. Art, in such a context, parades lofty ideals of justice and equality, and sprinkles aspirational dreams that mesmerize, and includes fiery rhetoric that dresses up rivers of blood flowing and human scares that otherwise would be visible and felt. Today we must ask, and re-examine, what are we doing? why are we doing it? what is the cost? In the context of a show that goes to Technion in Haifa, what justice is advanced? I ask because, to be clear, despite the apology, Creative Time is not withdrawing its show and neither is ICI. So, what’s justice is the show facilitating in this context? It is, in fact, legitimizing an ongoing annihilation of a defenseless people. See, the art may seem to be dealing with issues of justice in the abstract, but operationally it is normalizing that exact injustice it is dialoging about. It facilitates conversations that lead nowhere while people are slaughtered, an entire population is caged, starved enough not to die, and experimented on for new technologies that are exported for profit to oppress other people, probably of color. Do you see the irony? Consider the aborigines of Australia, the First Nation of this country, the Jewish people during the Holocaust. In advancing justice, and in the interest of global social justice, freedom of expression and dialogue, would you or Creative Time do work in any of those geographies at the time? So when we say ‘never again,’ never again for whom exactly? I think we are at a moment where Creative Time chooses which side of history it is on. There are no ‘gray zones’ after Occupy Wall St. I do not want to see Creative Time on the side of history that is blind to its complicity and is happy with a Museum for the Palestinians, lamenting how could those present have been so silent for so long. No one should settle for a memorial for a people that once was in the name of art or justice or dialogue or mission or imaginary gray zones. People have the capacity and urge to learn and grow and act out justice in their lives every day. The question is what is Creative Time doing to facilitate that? Creative Time can facilitate a conversation about #BDS, that’s a dialogue that makes sense, that’s a dialogue artists that participated in 2012 Creative Time Summit were promised, which BDS first emerged as an issue. If we are to engage in meaningful conversation we have to be honest with each other and ourselves. What are we doing? Otherwise, the outcome is both absurd and catastrophic. Consider the above an open letter to Creative Time ~ With respect and militant love to Nato Thompson and Creative Time

  2. i do understand the distress of the artists discovering they were included in an exhibition without their explicit consent in violation of their own personal political beliefs and out of line with their chosen boycott, even if after it has been quite a bit of time since the show opened (i mean, its pretty surprising NOT to be aware of an exhibition that has been up for a while and already exhibited in Tel Aviv many months ago…). What I don’t understand is the desire to withdraw engagement in the “belly of the beast” so to speak. Especially for political Artists like Decolonizing Architecture, why wouldn’t one want to have the conversation at the site of conflict? Perhaps if these artists saw the forest through the trees there would be a great opportunity for persuasion and discussion. Progressive political change often emerges via the arts, and I think the entire blanket act of boycotting culture in general just ensures that those important conversations never happen where they really matter (not just in the pages of already left-leaning art presses and brooklyn alternative spaces). They also suggest that Israelis and Palestinians are monocultures–leaving little room for perceptions of compromise or change on either side.

    1. These are not the artist’s “personal political beliefs”. When you reduce collective solidarity to the individual, you miss the reason collective action (in this case BDS) is so effective. Israeli Apartheid cannot be negotiated because the very basis of its power is on the systematic annihilation of non-conforming Palestinian peoples (this is known to some of us as necropolitics/racial cleansing). Artists are realizing BDS is increasingly the only tool that has any real leverage in representing voices that international communities permit to be asphyxiated and deleted daily by the Israeli Defense Force.

    2. You are right of course. But then again, (pro)Palestinian activists do nothing better than shoot themselves in the foot time and time again. And with the BDS, they are continuing down the path of fantasies about how BDS will persuade Israeli Jews that they are colonists who should leave or let several millions of people who hate them into the country to suddenly become the minority, because the minorities fare so well under Arab-majority or Muslim-majority regimes… (You know like about a million of Jews who lived under Muslim/Arab regimes and ended up having to emigrate, including to Israel; like currently many European Jews are doing to escape violence from the Arabs/Muslims in Europe.)

Comments are closed.