After twice suggesting the elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, which are two of the largest sources of federal art funding, President Trump has signed an omnibus spending bill that slightly increases funding for both agencies.
The NEA and the NEH will each receive about $153 million in fiscal year 2018 — around $3 million more than their 2017 budgets of about $149 million.
Trump previously threatened to veto the $1.3 trillion spending bill, in part because it did not fully fund a wall on the US-Mexico border. “I will never sign another bill like this again,” Trump said.
In a short statement shared with Hyperallergic, the NEA said, “The National Endowment for the Arts is deeply appreciative of the support of members of Congress.” The spending bill received bipartisan support, including the vocal support from a number of key Republicans, in the House and Senate.
President Trump proposed deep cuts to federal arts funding in 2017 and 2018, and suggested that the NEA and NEH be eliminated altogether in the near future. A wide range of lawmakers and organizations — most recently a coalition of 11 foundations — made statements in opposition to his proposal.
Government-funded arts organizations have often been targeted by advocates of limited government, although federal arts spending makes up a comparatively tiny portion of the budget. In 2016, approximately 0.004% of federal funding went to the NEA. That year, the states that received the largest share of NEA grant money were Vermont, Alaska, and Wyoming.
“With this funding, NEH will be able to aggressively support essential cultural infrastructure projects across the country,” Jon Parrish Peede, Senior Deputy Chairman of the NEH, said in a statement sent to Hyperallergic.
Echoing recent figures released by the NEA, which estimated that the arts contributed $763 billion to the US economy in 2015, Peede said, “Our federal dollars play a catalytic role in generating local investment and sustainable economic development.”
Join Hyperallergic for an online conversation with Kiowa Tribal Museum Director Tahnee Ahtone on January 25 at 7pm (EST).
This week, Patrisse Cullors speaks, reviewing John Richardson’s final Picasso book, the Met Museum snags a rare oil on copper by Nicolas Poussin, and much more.
Graduate students in the University of Denver’s Emergent Digital Practices program work on research with faculty who are engaged directly with their communities, both online and off.
Alexi Worth’s paintings demand a double take that allows viewers to look closer and begin dissembling the painting in order to understand what is being looked at.
Anastasia Pelias’s sculpture builds on this mythological legacy, suggesting we all have the ability to commune with a higher power and influence our futures.
Curated by Jill Kearney, this exhibition in Frenchtown, NJ amplifies stories both local and universal with work by Willie Cole, Sandra Ramos, sTo Len, and more.
Jack Spicer’s poetry can be deeply funny and playful but it has a consistent undercurrent of sadness.
Belinda Rathbone’s biography traces the sculptor’s embrace of kinetic mechanisms to his work in the Singer Sewing Machine factory.
The first lecture is on the relationship between early portrait photography and diverse notions of US identity during the Gilded Age. Register to attend on January 25.
It’s the first time in the country’s history that objects of this significance are offered for public sale.
Schwartz was at the forefront of computer-generated art before desktops or the kind of software that makes it commonplace today.
Curator La Tanya S. Autry shares a set of crucial questions she considers when curating images of anti-Black violence.