Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.
Yesterday, a judge in the Superior Court of Justice in Mexico City issued a temporary injunction against sales of the doll, suggesting that the Panama-based Frida Kahlo Corporation may not have the authority to give Mattel the rights to Kahlo’s image. The Corporation claims it was granted rights to Kahlo’s image and likeness more than a decade ago by the artist’s niece, Isolda Pinedo Kahlo, according to the Guardian.
“The Frida Kahlo Corporation actively participated in the process of designing the doll, Mattel has its permission and a legal contract that grants it the rights to make a doll of the great Frida Kahlo,” the toy company said in a statement last month, when the doll was released to coincide with International Women’s Day, as part of its Inspiring Women series.
However, Kahlo’s great-niece, Mara de Anda Romeo, argued in court that Mattel did not have those rights. The temporary injunction blocks Mattel and Mexican retailers from selling or promoting the Kahlo doll in Mexico until the issue is resolved.
Pablo Sangri, the attorney for Kahlo’s family, said that the injunction in Mexico is the first step of a broader legal campaign that may expand to the United States next. “This litigation is in its first stage,” Sangri said. “We asked the judge to grant certain precautionary measures to protect our rights to Frida Kahlo’s intellectual property.”
De Anda Romeo has been demanding a redesign of the doll since the first images were released in early March. Her criticisms include the doll’s missing unibrow, its relatively tame clothes compared to Kahlo’s ornate and intricate Tehuana wardrobe, its lightened skin tone, and its typically thin Barbie body shape. She told the AFP: “It should have been a much more Mexican doll, with darker skin, a unibrow, not so thin because Frida was not that thin … dressed in more Mexican clothing, with Mexican jewelry.”
At least one buyer disagrees with the criticisms of the Kahlo doll. In his five-star review on Mattel’s website, user “Mexican Dad” says:
Growing up all we had as Hispanics were American inspired toys…. from Barbie to He-Man… finally we get a doll that’s not a Quinceñera doll and we cry about it. Get over it people if you don’t like the doll don’t buy it but don’t rain on all other people who waited a life time for this doll.
Though the Frida Kahlo Barbie may be the most high-profile doll based on a female artist to date, it is by no means the first. In the 1860s, dolls based on the famous French painter Rosa Bonheur were a big hit.
This week, LA’s new Academy Museum, the intersections of anti-Blackness and anti-fatness, a largely unknown 19th century Black theater in NYC, sign language interpreters, and more.
Titian’s paintings are masterpieces, with all the complications of the term.
Through “Historic Site,” an 8-foot-tall plaque and Historic Sight, a year-long rotating exhibition in Pittsburgh, the Black Cube Fellows investigate how history is constructed, remembered, and retold.
Lawson’s images, and the ways that she has discussed her process, seem to be actively reproducing the kind of big-dick energy power dynamics of White male artists who also claim mastery over their subject matter.
Jenkins’s new short film, the centerpiece of a MoMI exhibit on The Underground Railroad, uses his signature techniques to confront the viewer.
Romanticism to Ruin: Two Lost Works of Sullivan and Wright memorializes Chicago’s Garrick Theatre and Buffalo’s Larkin Building, which were razed to build a parking lot and a truck stop.