Support Hyperallergic’s independent arts journalism.
The United States has the largest documented number of incarcerated people in the world. Over 2.2 million people are currently locked up in prison facilities across the country, a population that disproportionately consists of people of color. Though African Americans and Hispanic people make up about 32% of the US population, they comprise 56% of all incarcerated people in 2015, according to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). African Americans are incarcerated at more than five times the rate of white people. Now, a PEN America policy paper on restrictions regulating books in prisons reveals that incarcerated people are being denied access to literature on race and civil rights. The current sweeping regulations, PEN America says, represent the largest book ban policy in the US.
The report, entitled “Literature Locked Up: How Prison Book Restriction Policies Constitute the Nation’s Largest Book Ban” points to arbitrariness in implementing book bans in prisons and a lack of transparency and oversight over the process. The report found that titles like Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness (2010) and Cornel West’s Race Matters (1993) are subject to bans in some prisons on grounds of “threatening to disrupt a prison’s social order, hindering rehabilitation, or supporting criminal behavior.”
“Such grounds are so arbitrary and so broad that they often operate as sweeping bans,” the PEN America says, adding that prisons are increasingly limiting incarcerated people’s abilities to order books directly, or receive used books from families, arguing that such book deliveries pose a security threat.
Books in prisons are censored on both statewide and federal levels, the report says. But they are also banned on the individual level, as officers are empowered to arbitrarily decide what book to allow into their facility, and on a prison-wide level, depending on one prison’s specific policy. As a result, certain books may be allowed in some prisons and banned in others.
The state of Texas has officially banned more the 10,000 books including Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses (1988), Alice Walker’s The Color Purple (1982), and books on the Civil Rights Movement. But most states keep their lists of banned books under wraps, the report says, and the ones that do reveal their lists neglect to share changes and additions with the public.
Book-banning decisions are rarely reviewed, the report adds. “When they are reviewed, [they are] commonly rubber-stamped by other corrections officials,” it says. A 1974 US Supreme Court ruling established that prisons must offer an administrative appeals process where the reviewer was not involved in the original censorship decision. But the ruling did not require that this reviewer be independent of the prison system, nor did it determine any criteria for the reviewer’s qualifications. “The result is a review system that fails to operate as a serious check on prison censorship,” the report says.
This lack of oversight has led to some absurd results. Officials at an Ohio prison prevented a book donation group from sending a biology textbook to an incarcerated person, labeling the anatomical drawings as “nudity.” In Florida, prisons have banned Klingon dictionaries and a coloring book about chickens. In New York, one prison attempted to ban a book of maps of the moon, arguing the book could “present risks of escape.”
“The goal of this briefer is not to demonize prison officials or to belittle legitimate security concerns,” PEN America clarifies. “It does aim to demonstrate, however, that the book restrictions in American prisons are often arbitrary, overbroad, opaque, subject to little meaningful review, and overly dismissive of incarcerated people’s right to access literature behind bars.”
PEN America recommends that prisons follow the guideline of the American Library Association’s Prisoners’ Right to Read — Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights. It also urges state and federal officials to enact “meaningful review policies”, demonstrate more transparency about their book bans, and develop “clear and non-discriminatory policies governing such restrictions”.
“The right to read is one that implicates our fundamental human and constitutional rights,” PEN America says. “Meaningful access to literature is essential for incarcerated people, where the written word is a rare source of information, education, and recreation, and a window to the wider world.”
The following is a list of some the books banned in prisons across the country, as compiled by PEN America:
Paradise by Toni Morrison
- Banned by: Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
- Reason for Banning: “Contains material that a reasonable person would construe as written solely for the purpose of communicating information designed to achieve a breakdown.”
Blood in the Water: The Attica Prison Uprising of 1971 and Its Legacy by Heather Ann Thompson
- Banned by: Illinois Department of Corrections; New Hampshire Department of Corrections; and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.
- Reasons for Banning: No reason provided in Illinois, “security concerns-encourage group disruption” in New Hampshire, no reason provided in Ohio.
Visiting Day by Jacqueline Woodson, illustrated by James E. Ransome
- Banned by: Danville Correctional Center (Illinois)
- Reason for Banning: No reason provided
Chokehold: Policing Black Men by Paul Butler
- Banned by: Arizona Department of Corrections
- Reasons for Banning: Security purposes, contains “unauthorized content,” and could be “detrimental to the safe, secure and orderly operation” of prison facilities
The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold
- Banned by: New Hampshire Department of Corrections; Kansas Department of Corrections: Lansing Correctional Facility; and Michigan Department of Corrections.
- Reasons for Banning: “Sexually explicit and offensive”
Her Body and Other Parties by Carmen Maria Machado
- Banned by: Missouri Department of Corrections
- Reasons for Banning: “Contains inappropriate sexual behaviors, sexually explicit materials, and pictures” and “Constitutes a threat to the security”
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou
- Banned by: Arizona Department of Corrections and North Carolina Department of Public Safety.
- Reason for Banning: Sexual content
Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides
- Banned by: Texas Department of Criminal Justice
- Reason for Banning: Sexual content
The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank
- Banned by: Guantánamo Bay Detention Camp.
- Reason for Banning: No reason provided
No Vacancy, curated by Jody Graf, will be on view from October 26 through November 8 at the school’s Kellen Gallery in New York City.
Unless you were already familiar with Bey’s documentary work, the horror he refers to might not be recognizable to you.
The intention behind the seemingly bizarre combination was, according to Attie, “to give visual form to the shared American and Brazilian reality of nationalistic divisions that defines our political present.”
Nowhere in the museums’ advertising blitzkrieg for the performance were we told to bring our wildfire-season masks as well as our covid masks, and covid masks don’t prevent smoke inhalation.
Art by Athena LaTocha, Wendy Red Star, Marianne Nicolson, Anita Fields, Jaune Quick-to-See Smith & Neal Ambrose-Smith, and more is on view through January 2022.
Several members of the 2021 cohort identify as artists and storytellers, utilizing the power that art and narrative have on changing ideas of power.
Made possible by a donation from Amazon stakeholder MacKenzie Scott, the award is the single largest in the Bedstuy-based organization’s history.
A donation of two hundred works includes Jean-Michel Basquiat, Robert Mapplethorpe, Keith Haring, and Donald Baechler.