When walking into Paris, Capital of Fashion, currently on view at The Museum at FIT, I feared an experience of bells, whistles, and fawning over France’s supremacy in the spheres of fashion and culture. Thankfully, I was wrong.
Spread between two galleries Paris, Capital of Fashion, thoughtfully curated by Dr. Valerie Steele, traces the ascent of French fashion and its subsequent preeminence for the past five centuries (although though the majority of the examples date from the late 19th and 20th century). The first gallery analyzes the impact of Paris in a global fashion market and its ongoing interaction with — and, as the exhibition brochure states, “soft power” over — other fashion capitals. The main gallery, by contrast, is a pure celebration of Parisian couture.
Of course, the exhibition is full of pretty and frilly things, as Steele emphasizes how it all started at Versailles. Entering a secluded, sanctum-like section of the main gallery, which feels like a Sofia Coppola or Baz Luhrmann movie, we witness the legacy of the French royal court in fashion and fashion-adjacent visual culture. The few Versailles-era garments (a dress, a corset) are accompanied by costume designs from the 1930s, courtier-inspired women’s suits by Nicolas Ghesquiere, and one garment by John Galliano for Dior’s Autumn/Winter 2000-2001 collection; titled “Freud or Fetish,” the collection was influenced by excess and fetishism, which included a wink to the French aristocracy in its prime and its downfall.
Spread across the sections including “The Cult of the Designer” and “Fashion, Art, Luxury” are what come closest to real-life Disney princess ballgowns: a 1866-67 creation designed by Charles Frederick Worth; a scarlet evening cape by Gabrielle “Coco” Chanel from 1927; a Grecian goddess-style ivory silk jersey gown circa 1945 by Madame Grès; and two Christian Dior creations from the 1950s, a black minimalist gown from Dior’s famous 1955 Y-line and a pale blue ballgown adorned with pink flower buds.
However, the garments in Paris, Capital of Fashion do not all conjure an image of ivory tower luxury. Beginning in the late 1800s with Charles Worth, Paris managed to remain a “capital of fashion” thanks to the influx of foreign-born and immigrant designers. Jewish-Egyptian immigrant Gaby Aghion, who founded Chloe in 1952, pioneered what she called “luxury pret-à-porter” — fine ready-to-wear fashion. Her label became iconic under such creative directors as German-born Karl Lagerfeld and, later, British designers Stella McCartney and Phoebe Philo. Modernist designer Bouchra Jarrar, who worked for Balenciaga, Lacroix, and Lanvin prior to founding her own label, combines high fashion with function; the show features a beaded top adorned with rooster feathers, worn with plain white trousers.
While issues of diversity are not broadly addressed in the exhibition, Olivier Rousteing, a Black designer from Bordeaux who was appointed creative director at Balmain at just 25, is represented by a sculptural minidress made with raffia and rhinestones. In addition, the exhibition includes a partial recreation of the 1973 “Battle of Versailles” fashion show, a fundraiser for repairs to the palace in which American and French designers faced off. The Americans runway featured 11 Black models, an unprecedented number at the time.
What stands out in the most positive way is that Paris, Capital of Fashion avoided acknowledging the way Instagram and social media have reshaped the fetishization of Frenchness in a way that is visually dull, reductive, and borderline racist in its lily-white idea of Frenchness.
In all, Paris, Capital of Fashion is a comprehensive visual compendium that can help audiences understand the way fashion became foundational to the identity of the city. Perhaps this can become an ongoing series celebrating fashion capitals worldwide, whether established or emerging.
Paris, Capital of Fashion continues at the Museum at FIT (227 West 27th Street, Manhattan) through January 4.
To understand contemporary art, it is necessary to investigate the connections that are sometimes omitted or undervalued in art history.
Gearhart founded a print gallery with her sisters and was at the center of the Arts and Crafts movement in southern California.
Featuring underwater recordings from around the world, this immersive, site-specific installation is on view at the Lenfest Center for the Arts in NYC from February 3 to 13.
Video art was something you watched “with the lights on,” as França insisted, without pretenses of high art.
PHASE 2 would emerge as an innovator in New York’s burgeoning subway art movement, creating elaborate murals that would shape the evolution of both the spray can and the art form.
BRIC’s multidisciplinary program in Brooklyn has cohorts in Contemporary Art, Film & TV, Performing Arts, and Video Art. Applications are due March 10.
While the South Asian diaspora is one of the largest and most widely dispersed in the world, the Indo-Caribbean community is often overlooked and excluded from discussions of South Asian art.
The Bay Area artist believed in shaping artists rather than relaying rules.
Open-ended, community based, and collaborative, “esolangs” serve as a reminder that digital art has other histories and other futures.
Working with what they had, Cass Corridor artists scrapped and repurposed anything they could get their hands on, attempting to find some salvation for their city through a literal process of salvage and reuse.
Throughout the 1970s and into the ’80s, artists in Los Angeles created organizations and exhibition spaces to develop the resources they lacked.